Crossflow microfiltration of low concentration-nonliving yeast suspensions

Crossflow microfiltration of low concentration-nonliving yeast suspension was studied and effects of transmembrane pressure drop (ΔP), membrane pore size and crossflow velocity on the membrane fluxes have been investigated. Filtration mechanism was explained by various flux decline models such as standard, intermediate, complete blocking and cake filtration. It was shown that permeate flux decay could be divided into three distinctive regions such as constant, rapid flux decay and slow flux decay periods by using relations of J(t)–t, t/V–V and V–t on the same plot. It was concluded that flux decline model fit to intermediate blocking model at the beginning of the filtration and then classical cake filtration became dominant filtration mechanism. It was found that specific cake resistance increased with increasing ΔP. Compressibility coefficient (n) was calculated to be 1 and 0.39 for crossflow and dead-end filtration modes, respectively. Steady-state permeate fluxes increased with membrane pore size and crossflow velocity, and decreased with increasing yeast concentration. It was determined that pseudo-gel concentration on the membrane surface was 45 g/l and it was independent from crossflow velocity and membrane pore size.

[1]  W. D. Mores,et al.  Direct visual observation of yeast deposition and removal during microfiltration , 2001 .

[2]  B. Keskinler,et al.  Removal of divalent heavy metal mixtures from water by Saccharomyces cerevisiae using crossflow microfiltration. , 2001, Water research.

[3]  D. Brady,et al.  Bioaccumulation of metal cations by Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1994, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[4]  Kanji Matsumoto,et al.  Separation of yeast by cross-flow filtration with backwashing , 1987 .

[5]  K. Nakanishi,et al.  Crossflow filtration of yeast broth cultivated in molasses , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  J. M. Casas,et al.  On the electrodialysis of aqueous H2SO4–CuSO4 electrolytes with metallic impurities , 2002 .

[7]  P. Norris,et al.  Accumulation of Cadmium and Cobalt by Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1977 .

[8]  R. Wakeman,et al.  Electric field enhanced crossflow microfiltration of hydrophobically modified water soluble polymers , 1997 .

[9]  J. Teixeira,et al.  Influence of cell-shape on the cake resistance in dead-end and cross-flow filtrations , 2002 .

[10]  J. Hermia,et al.  Constant Pressure Blocking Filtration Laws - Application To Power-law Non-newtonian Fluids , 1982 .

[11]  B. Keskinler,et al.  Effect of ionic environment on the crossflow microfiltration behaviour of yeast suspensions , 2002 .

[12]  Robert W. Field,et al.  Cross-flow and dead-end microfiltration of oily-water emulsion. Part I: Experimental study and analysis of flux decline , 1995 .

[13]  D. Brady,et al.  The use of hollow fiber cross-flow microfiltration in bioaccumulation and continuous removal of heavy metals from solution by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[14]  C. Huang,et al.  The removal of Cu(II) from dilute aqueous solutions by Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1990 .

[15]  Hans G.L. Coster,et al.  Direct observation of particle deposition on the membrane surface during crossflow microfiltration , 1998 .

[16]  K. Nakanishi,et al.  Factors affecting the performance of crossflow filtration of yeast cell suspension , 1993, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[17]  R. Wakeman,et al.  Electric field intensification of surfactant mediated separation processes , 1996 .