Copied citations create renowned papers

Recently we discovered (cond-mat/0212043) that the majority of scientific citations are copied from the lists of references used in other papers. Here we show that a model, in which a scientist picks three random papers, cites them,and also copies a quarter of their references accounts quantitatively for empirically observed citation distribution. Simple mathematical probability, not genius, can explain why some papers are cited a lot more than the other.

[1]  S. Redner,et al.  Organization of growing random networks. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[3]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[4]  S. Redner.  How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution , 1998, cond-mat/9804163.

[5]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[6]  F. Moore,et al.  War and Peace , 1918, Nature.

[7]  Vwani P. Roychowdhury,et al.  Read Before You Cite! , 2003, Complex Syst..

[8]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[9]  Augustus De Morgan,et al.  A Budget of Paradoxes , 1916 .

[10]  Derek de Solla Price,et al.  A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes , 1976, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[11]  Z. K. Silagadze,et al.  Citations and the Zipf-Mandelbrot Law , 1999, Complex Syst..

[12]  G. M..  A Budget of Paradoxes , Nature.

[13]  A. Vázquez.  Knowing a network by walking on it: emergence of scaling , 2000, cond-mat/0006132.

[14]  C. Cleverdon.  Citation Indexing , 1965, Nature.