SWAT Modeling of Water Quantity and Quality in the Tennessee River Basin: Spatiotemporal Calibration and Validation

Abstract. Model-data comparisons are always challenging, especially when working at a large spatial scale and evaluating multiple response variables. We implemented the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to simulate water quantity and quality for the Tennessee River Basin. We developed three innovations to overcome hurdles associated with limited data for model evaluation: 1) we implemented an auto-calibration approach to allow simultaneous calibration against multiple responses, including intermediate response variables, 2) we identified empirical spatiotemporal datasets to use in our comparison, and 3) we compared functional patterns in landuse-nutrient relationships between SWAT and empirical data. Comparing monthly SWAT-simulated runoff against USGS data produced satisfactory median Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiencies of 0.83 and 0.72 for calibration and validation periods, respectively. SWAT-simulated water quality responses (sediment, TP, TN, and inorganic N) reproduced the seasonal patterns found in LOADEST data. SWAT-simulated spatial TN loadings were significantly correlated with empirical SPARROW estimates. The spatial correlation analyses indicated that SWAT-modeled runoff was primarily controlled by precipitation; sedimentation was controlled by topography; and NO3 and soluble P were highly influenced by land management, particularly the proportion of agricultural lands in a subbasin

[1]  Shuguang Liu,et al.  Modeling of land use and reservoir effects on nonpoint source pollution in a highly agricultural basin. , 2012, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[2]  J. Arnold,et al.  SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling , 2005 .

[3]  J. Xia,et al.  Improvement of SWAT2000 modelling to assess the impact of dams and sluices on streamflow in the Huai River basin of China , 2010 .

[4]  Shuguang Liu,et al.  Improvement of the R-SWAT-FME framework to support multiple variables and multi-objective functions. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Evaluation of global optimization algorithms for parameter calibration of a computationally intensive hydrologic model , 2009 .

[6]  Michael E. Barber,et al.  SWAT modeling with uncertainty and cluster analyses of tillage impacts on hydrological processes , 2014, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[7]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Fish Functional Traits Correlated with Environmental Variables in a Temperate Biodiversity Hotspot , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  J. Arnold,et al.  VALIDATION OF THE SWAT MODEL ON A LARGE RWER BASIN WITH POINT AND NONPOINT SOURCES 1 , 2001 .

[9]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Hydrologic Modelling of the United States with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool , 1998 .

[10]  W. Dodds,et al.  Headwater Influences on Downstream Water Quality , 2007, Environmental management.

[11]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[12]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Forecasting changes in water quality in rivers associated with growing biofuels in the Arkansas‐White‐Red river drainage, USA , 2015 .

[13]  W. Cao,et al.  Multi‐variable and multi‐site calibration and validation of SWAT in a large mountainous catchment with high spatial variability , 2006 .

[14]  James D. Williams,et al.  Biodiversity on the brink: an assessment of conservation strategies for North American freshwater mussels , 2013, Hydrobiologia.

[15]  George B. Arhonditsis,et al.  Evaluation of the current state of distributed watershed nutrient water quality modeling. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.