Rapid ocean signals in polar motion and length of day

[1] Non-tidal variability in ocean currents and bottom pressure is substantial at short periods, but relating the associated signals in ocean angular momentum (OAM) to observed polar motion and length of day fluctuations has been difficult. Our simulations using a barotropic ocean model reveal a clear connection between the estimated OAM signals and both polar motion and length of day at periods of 3–10 days. The dynamic response of the oceans to barometric pressure plays an important role in the excitation of rapid rotation signals. The impact of OAM variability is most clear when using GPS-based Earth orientation measurements with little temporal smoothing. Using the GPS series, and accounting for OAM in addition to atmospheric effects, yields substantial improvements in the excitation budget for rapid polar motion and length of day. The comparisons with Earth rotation data provide a useful check on the rapid ocean variability simulated by the barotropic model.

[1]  Raymond Hide,et al.  Atmospheric angular momentum fluctuations, length-of-day changes and polar motion , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[2]  John M. Wahr,et al.  The Earth’s Rotation , 2020, A View of the Sea.

[3]  R. Rosen,et al.  Topographic Forcing of the Atmosphere and a Rapid Change in the Length of Day , 1994, Science.

[4]  Dickey,et al.  Detection and modeling of NonTidal oceanic effects on Earth's rotation rate , 1998, Science.

[5]  J. Dickey,et al.  Earth's Variable Rotation , 1991, Science.

[6]  Richard D. Rosen,et al.  The sub-bureau for atmospheric angular momentum of the International Earth Rotation Service: A meteorological data center with geodetic applications , 1993 .

[7]  F. Bryan,et al.  Short‐period oceanic circulation: Implications for satellite altimetry , 2000 .

[8]  Carl Wunsch,et al.  De‐aliasing of global high frequency barotropic motions in altimeter observations , 2000 .

[9]  Further evidence for oceanic excitation of polar motion , 1999 .

[10]  D. Stammer,et al.  Oceanic signals in observed motions of the Earth's pole of rotation , 1998, Nature.

[11]  R. HIDE,et al.  The Earth's Angular Momentum Budget on Subseasonal Time Scales , 1992, Science.

[12]  R. Rosen,et al.  Causes of rapid motions of the Earth's pole , 1988, Nature.

[13]  I. Fukumori,et al.  Modeling the high‐frequency barotropic response of the ocean to atmospheric disturbances: Sensitivity to forcing, topography, and friction , 2001 .

[14]  F. Bryan,et al.  Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE , 1998 .

[15]  Markus Rothacher,et al.  IGS Combined and Contributed Earth Rotation Parameter Solutions , 2000 .

[16]  R. Ponte.  Variability in a homogeneous global ocean forced by barometric pressure , 1993 .

[17]  R. Ponte.  Oceanic excitation of daily to seasonal signals in Earth rotation: results from a constant-density numerical model , 1997 .

[18]  R. Rosen.  The axial momentum balance of Earth and its fluid envelope , 1993 .

[19]  C. Wunsch,et al.  Improving ocean angular momentum estimates using a model constrained by data , 2001 .

[20]  Ichiro Fukumori,et al.  Nature of global large‐scale sea level variability in relation to atmospheric forcing: A modeling study , 1998 .

[21]  N. T. Birch,et al.  Atmospheric angular momentum fluctuations and changes in the length of the day , 1980, Nature.

[22]  Jim R. Ray,et al.  IGS Earth Rotation Parameters , 1999, GPS Solutions.

[23]  Richard S. Gross,et al.  Combinations of Earth-orientation measurements: SPACE97, COMB97, and POLE97 , 2000 .

[24]  Atmospheric excitation of polar motion during the GIG '91 measurement campaign. [GPS International Earth Rotation Service and Geodynamics experiment , 1992 .