Automated analysis of DNA damage in the high-throughput version of the comet assay.

Recently a high-throughput version of the comet assay was developed using a special 96-well multichamber plate (MCP) [1]. In this version, the electrophoresis is performed directly on the MCP, which makes transferring of cells to microscope slides unnecessary. In order to facilitate the scoring procedure we adapted an automated slide-scanning system (Metafer MetaCyte with CometScan) to enable unattended analysis of comets on the MCP. The results of the system were compared with the data obtained with two interactive comet-assay analysis systems. For induction of DNA damage in human fibroblasts methylmethane sulfonate (MMS) or H2O2 was used. The three systems revealed similar, concentration-dependent results for all parameters tested: tail moment (tm), % DNA-in-tail and olive tail moment. Near the detection limit of 5-6% DNA-in-tail a significant difference with the untreated control was obtained by use of four parallel samples (p=0.01). With the newly developed automated analysis system, the evaluation of either 50 or 100 comets yielded similar standard errors for either treatment with MMS or H2O2, thus showing that the method is suitable to reveal the crucial low-dose effects with high precision. The results also show that the time needed for automated evaluation of comets on the MCP was reduced by a factor of 10 when compared with the time required for interactive evaluation. In summary, the high-throughput version of the comet assay combined with the automated evaluating system increased the output by a factor up to 180 compared with the standard method.

[1]  P. Olive,et al.  The comet assay: a comprehensive review. , 1995, Mutation research.

[2]  I. Witte,et al.  The ability of the high-throughput comet assay to measure the sensitivity of five cell lines toward methyl methanesulfonate, hydrogen peroxide, and pentachlorophenol. , 2010, Mutation research.

[3]  R. Tice,et al.  Single cell gel/comet assay: Guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing , 2000, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[4]  W Böcker,et al.  Automated comet assay analysis. , 1999, Cytometry.

[5]  R. Tice,et al.  A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. , 1988, Experimental cell research.

[6]  W Frieauff,et al.  Automatic analysis of slides processed in the Comet assay. , 2001, Mutagenesis.

[7]  K J Johanson,et al.  Microelectrophoretic study of radiation-induced DNA damages in individual mammalian cells. , 1984, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[8]  T. Lörch,et al.  New developments in automated cytogenetic imaging: unattended scoring of dicentric chromosomes, micronuclei, single cell gel electrophoresis, and fluorescence signals , 2004, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[9]  E. Rojas,et al.  Single cell gel electrophoresis assay: methodology and applications. , 1999, Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical sciences and applications.

[10]  Irene Witte,et al.  Genetic toxicity assessment: employing the best science for human safety evaluation part III: the comet assay as an alternative to in vitro clastogenicity tests for early drug candidate selection. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[11]  I. Witte,et al.  Performance of the comet assay in a high-throughput version. , 2009, Mutation research.