The Neural Mechanism Underlying Ordinal Numerosity Processing

Changes in the sensory properties of numerosity stimuli have a direct effect on the outcomes of nonsymbolic number tasks. This suggests a prominent role of sensory properties in numerosity processing. However, the current consensus holds that numerosity is processed independent of its sensory properties. To investigate the role of sensory cues in ordinal number processes, we manipulated both dimensions orthogonally. Participants passively viewed the stimuli while their brain activity was measured using EEG. The results revealed an interaction between numerosity and its sensory properties in the absence of main effects. Different neural responses were present for trials where numerosity and sensory cues changed in the same direction compared with trials where they changed in opposite directions. These results show that the sensory cues are expected to change in concert with numerosity and support the notion that the visual cues are taken into account when judging numerosity.

[1]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  Number bias for the discrimination of large visual sets in infancy , 2004, Cognition.

[2]  Matthew Inglis,et al.  Non-verbal number acuity correlates with symbolic mathematics achievement: But only in children , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  Inkeri K. Herfs,et al.  The development of automated access to symbolic and non‐symbolic number knowledge in children: an ERP study , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[4]  Titia Gebuis,et al.  False Approximations of the Approximate Number System? , 2011, PloS one.

[5]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[6]  N Ginsburg,et al.  Perceived Numerosity as a Function of Item Size , 1988, Perceptual and motor skills.

[7]  Sumarga H. Suanda,et al.  Changes in the Ability to Detect Ordinal Numerical Relationships Between 9 and 11 Months of Age. , 2008, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[8]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[9]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  The development of ordinal numerical knowledge in infancy , 2002, Cognition.

[10]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for differential processing of numerical quantity and order in humans. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[11]  V. Csépe,et al.  The speed of magnitude processing and executive functions in controlled and automatic number comparison in children: an electro-encephalography study , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[12]  G. Mangun,et al.  Luminance and spatial attention effects on early visual processing. , 1995, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  B. P. Klein,et al.  Topographic Representation of Numerosity in the Human Parietal Cortex , 2013, Science.

[14]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  The interplay between nonsymbolic number and its continuous visual properties. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[16]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  The Role of Visual Information in Numerosity Estimation , 2012, PloS one.

[17]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[18]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  The development of automatic numerosity processing in preschoolers: evidence for numerosity-perceptual interference. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[19]  Daniel C. Hyde,et al.  All Numbers Are Not Equal: An Electrophysiological Investigation of Small and Large Number Representations , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Daniele Didino,et al.  ‘How many’ and ‘how much’ dissociate in the parietal lobe , 2015, Cortex.

[21]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for notation independence in numerical processing , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[22]  W. Fias,et al.  Offline and online automatic number comparison , 2008, Psychological research.

[23]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  The neural mechanisms underlying passive and active processing of numerosity , 2013, NeuroImage.

[24]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Response-Selection-Related Parietal Activation during Number Comparison , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  A. L. Miller,et al.  The effects of shape, size, heterogeneity, and instructional set on the judgment of visual number. , 1968, The American journal of psychology.

[26]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Continuous visual properties explain neural responses to nonsymbolic number. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[27]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Generating nonsymbolic number stimuli , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[28]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Magnitude comparison in preschoolers: what counts? Influence of perceptual variables. , 2004, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[29]  Catherine Sophian,et al.  How do people apprehend large numerosities? , 2008, Cognition.

[30]  Andrea Facoetti,et al.  Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia , 2010, Cognition.

[31]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  Heterogeneity impairs numerical matching but not numerical ordering in preschool children. , 2007, Developmental science.

[32]  Fruzsina Soltész,et al.  The interaction of task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimulus features in the number/size congruency paradigm: An ERP study , 2008, Brain Research.

[33]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Notation-Dependent and -Independent Representations of Numbers in the Parietal Lobes , 2007, Neuron.

[34]  Fruzsina Soltész,et al.  Relationships between magnitude representation, counting and memory in 4- to 7-year-old children: A developmental study , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[35]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Multiple cues for quantification in infancy: is number one of them? , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  F. Kingdom,et al.  A common visual metric for approximate number and density , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Matthew Inglis,et al.  Measuring the Approximate Number System , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[38]  G R Mangun,et al.  Attention and spatial selection: Electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  Fei Xu,et al.  Number sense in human infants. , 2005, Developmental science.

[40]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.