More than just national cultural distance: Testing new distance scales on FDI in Slovakia

Over the past decade, numerous calls have been made within the international business literature for a broader conceptualization and measurement of non-geographic forms distance amongst countries. One promising response to this call has been a set of psychic distance stimuli scales put forward by Dow, D., & Karunaratna, A. (2006). Developing a multidimensional instrument to measure psychic distance stimuli. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5), 575-577. However, to date, these new scales have only been tested in one very limited setting - predicting bi-lateral trade flows. This paper extends the generalizability of the Dow and Karunaratna scales by testing their criterion-related validity with respect to three specific foreign direct investment (FDI) issues: predicting market selection, entry mode choice and performance. The results indicate that the Dow and Karunaratna scales are significantly stronger predictors of market selection and FDI performance than the traditional Kogut and Singh index; and that researchers should go beyond using national cultural distance as their sole measure of distance amongst countries. The results for predicting entry mode choice are more ambiguous; however, the authors argue that the ambiguity may reflect the inadequacies of the classic TCE-based approach to predicting entry mode, rather than shortcomings in the measurement of the distance construct.

[1]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Geographic scope and multinational enterprise performance , 2003 .

[2]  L. Goldberg,et al.  Foreign bank activity in the United States: An analysis by country of origin , 1991 .

[3]  Bodo B. Schlegelmilch,et al.  Explaining export development through psychic distance: enlightening or elusive? , 1998 .

[4]  J. Anand,et al.  Technological Capabilities of Countries, Firm Rivalry and Foreign Direct Investment , 1997 .

[5]  J. Hennart,et al.  The Impact of Culture on the Strategy of Multinational Enterprises: Does National Origin Affect Ownership Decisions? , 1998 .

[6]  Witold J. Henisz,et al.  Japanese Firms' Investment Strategies in Emerging Economies , 2000 .

[7]  Keith D. Brouthers,et al.  Why Service and Manufacturing Entry Mode Choices Differ: The Influence of Transaction Cost Factors, Risk and Trust , 2003 .

[8]  Kang Rae Cho,et al.  Revisiting the role of cultural distance in MNC's foreign ownership mode choice: the moderating effect of experience attributes , 2005 .

[9]  David A. Griffith,et al.  The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: a meta-analysis , 2005 .

[10]  T. Agmon.  Bringing financial economics into international business research: taking advantage of a paradigm change , 2006 .

[11]  J. M. Geringer,et al.  Measuring Performance of International Joint Ventures , 1991 .

[12]  Carlos M. P. Sousa,et al.  Cultural Distance and Psychic Distance: Two Peas in a Pod? , 2006 .

[13]  Leon Zurawicki,et al.  Corruption and Foreign Direct Investment , 2002 .

[14]  Robert Grosse,et al.  Foreign Direct Investment in the United States: An Analysis by Country of Origin , 1996 .

[15]  O. Shenkar,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL DISTANCE AND THE MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISE , 2002 .

[16]  Arjen van Witteloostuijn,et al.  Foreign direct investment mode choice: entry and establishment modes in transition economies , 2007 .

[17]  Deepak K. Datta,et al.  CEO Experiences: Effects on the Choice of FDI Entry Mode , 2006 .

[18]  Jiatao Li.  Foreign entry and survival: effects of strategic choices on performance in international markets , 1995 .

[19]  Jody Evans,et al.  Psychic Distance and Organizational Performance: An Empirical Examination of International Retailing Operations , 2002 .

[20]  José Pla-Barber,et al.  Strategic Variables that Influence Entry Mode Choice in Service Firms , 2007 .

[21]  Anne-Wil Harzing,et al.  THE ROLE OF CULTURE IN ENTRY-MODE STUDIES: FROM NEGLECT TO MYOPIA? , 2003 .

[22]  Keith D. Brouthers,et al.  Explaining the National Cultural Distance Paradox , 2001 .

[23]  Sea Jin Chang,et al.  The choice of entry mode in sequential foreign direct investment , 2001 .

[24]  M. Erramilli.  The Experience Factor in Foreign Market Entry Behavior of Service Firms , 1991 .

[25]  P. Ellis,et al.  Does psychic distance moderate the market size–entry sequence relationship? , 2008 .

[26]  Ajai S. Gaur,et al.  Ownership Strategies and Survival of Foreign Subsidiaries: Impacts of Institutional Distance and Experience , 2007 .

[27]  H. Gatignon,et al.  The multinational corporation's degree of control over foreign subsidiaries : an empirical test of a transaction cost explanation , 1988 .

[28]  Jean-Luc Arregle,et al.  Mode of international entry: The advantages of multilevel methods , 2006 .

[29]  W. Davidson.  Market similarity and market selection: Implications for international marketing strategy , 1983 .

[30]  Geir Gripsrud,et al.  The Expansion of Foreign Direct Investments: Discrete Rational Location Choices or a Cultural Learning Process? , 1992 .

[31]  Klaus E. Meyer,et al.  Institutions, Transaction Costs, and Entry Mode Choice in Eastern Europe , 2001, Multinational Enterprises and Emerging Economies.

[32]  O. Shenkar,et al.  Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences , 2001 .

[33]  Ajai S. Gaur,et al.  Institutional Environments, Staffing Strategies, and Subsidiary Performance , 2007 .

[34]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  The effect of regulative and normative distances on MNE ownership and expatriate strategies , 2004 .

[35]  Harbir Singh,et al.  The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode , 1988 .

[36]  Jane Lu,et al.  Intra- and Inter-organizational Imitative Behavior: Institutional Influences on Japanese Firms' Entry Mode Choice , 2002 .

[37]  G. Hofstede.  Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[38]  J. Papastavrou,et al.  Accounting for Endogeneity When Assessing Strategy Performance: Does Entry Mode Choice Affect Fdi Survival , 1998 .

[39]  Ekrem Tatoglu,et al.  Institutional and transaction cost influences on MNEs' ownership strategies of their affiliates: Evidence from an emerging market , 2007 .

[40]  B. McSweeney.  Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural Differences and their Consequences: A Triumph of Faith - a Failure of Analysis , 2002 .

[41]  Taewon Suh,et al.  Transaction cost determinants and ownership-based entry mode choice: a meta-analytical review , 2004 .

[42]  Jiatao Li,et al.  Comparative Business Failures of Foreign-Controlled Firms in the United States , 1991 .

[43]  Michael A. Hitt,et al.  Advances in international management , 2002 .

[44]  Björn Ambos,et al.  The Antecedents of Psychic Distance , 2010 .

[45]  P. Brewer.  Operationalizing Psychic Distance: A Revised Approach , 2007 .

[46]  J. Jewkes,et al.  Theory of Location of Industries. , 1933 .

[47]  J. Johanson,et al.  THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF THE FIRM — FOUR SWEDISH CASES , 1975 .

[48]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[49]  Douglas Dow,et al.  Developing a multidimensional instrument to measure psychic distance stimuli , 2006 .

[50]  Keith D. Brouthers,et al.  Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance , 2002 .

[51]  Henry W. Lane,et al.  The Psychic Distance Paradox , 1996 .

[52]  Anne-Wil Harzing.  Acquisitions versus greenfield investments: international strategy and management of entry modes , 2002 .

[53]  Yigang Pan.  Equity Ownership in International Joint Ventures: The Impact of Source Country Factors , 2002 .

[54]  W. Beckerman,et al.  Distance and the pattern of intra-European trade , 1956 .