Acoustic characterization in whole blood and plasma of site-targeted nanoparticle ultrasound contrast agent for molecular imaging.

The ability to enhance specific molecular markers of pathology with ultrasound has been previously demonstrated by our group employing a nanoparticle contrast agent [Lanza et al., Invest. Radiol. 35, 227-234 (2000); Ultrasound Med. Biol. 23, 863-870 (1997)]. One of the advantages of this agent is very low echogenicity in the blood pool that allows increased contrast between the blood pool and the bound, site-targeted agent. We measured acoustic backscatter and attenuation coefficient as a function of the contrast agent concentration, ambient pressure, peak acoustic pressure, and as an effect of duty cycle and wave form shape. Measurements were performed while the nanoparticles were suspended in either whole porcine blood or plasma. The nanoparticles were only detectable when insonified within plasma devoid of red blood cells and were shown to exhibit backscatter levels more than 30 dB below the backscatter from whole blood. Attenuation of nanoparticles in whole porcine blood was not measurably different from that of whole blood alone over a range of concentrations up to eight times the maximum in vivo dose. The resulting data provide upper bounds on blood pool attenuation coefficient and backscatter and will be needed to more precisely define levels of molecular contrast enhancement that may be obtained in vivo.

[1]  S A Wickline,et al.  Temperature dependence of ultrasonic enhancement with a site-targeted contrast agent. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Nico de Jong,et al.  New ultrasound contrast agents and technological innovations. , 1996 .

[3]  Patrick J. Gaffney,et al.  Time evolution of enhanced ultrasonic reflection using a fibrin-targeted nanoparticulate contrast agent. , 2000 .

[4]  Jonathan R. Lindner,et al.  Noninvasive Assessment of Angiogenesis by Ultrasound and Microbubbles Targeted to &agr;v-Integrins , 2003, Circulation.

[5]  J. G. Miller,et al.  In vivo molecular imaging of stretch-induced tissue factor in carotid arteries with ligand-targeted nanoparticles. , 2000, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[6]  J. G. Miller,et al.  In vitro characterization of a novel, tissue-targeted ultrasonic contrast system with acoustic microscopy. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  Quantitative broadband ultrasonic backscatter: An approach to nondestructive evaluation in acoustically inhomogeneous materials , 1981 .

[8]  E. Ahmed Fractals and chaos in cancer models , 1993 .

[9]  J. Mobley,et al.  Broadband through-transmission signal loss measurements of Albunex® suspensions at concentrations approaching in vivo doses , 1997 .

[10]  J. G. Mottley,et al.  The measurement of backscatter coefficient from a broadband pulse-echo system: a new formulation , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[11]  J. Riess Chapter 23 – Fluorocarbon emulsions—Designing an efficient shuttle service for the respiratory gases—The so-called ‘Blood Substitutes’ , 2000 .

[12]  S A Wickline,et al.  Molecular imaging of stretch-induced tissue factor expression in carotid arteries with intravascular ultrasound. , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[13]  S. Wickline,et al.  Improvements in the ultrasonic contrast of targeted perfluorocarbon nanoparticles using an acoustic transmission line model , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[14]  N de Jong,et al.  Ultrasound scattering properties of Albunex microspheres. , 1993, Ultrasonics.

[15]  J. G. Miller,et al.  Differentiation between acutely ischemic myocardium and zones of completed infarction in dogs on the basis of frequency-dependent backscatter. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Jean G. Riess,et al.  Fluorocarbons and Fluorosurfactants for In Vivo Oxygen Transport (Blood Substitutes), Imaging, and Drug Delivery , 1999 .

[17]  S. Kaul,et al.  Noninvasive Imaging of Myocardial Reperfusion Injury Using Leukocyte-Targeted Contrast Echocardiography , 2002, Circulation.

[18]  E. Unger,et al.  In vitro studies of a new thrombus-specific ultrasound contrast agent. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  R. Jain,et al.  Cancer, angiogenesis and fractals , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[20]  K. Shung,et al.  Ultrasonic backscatter from flowing whole blood. I: Dependence on shear rate and hematocrit. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  R C Waag,et al.  Normalization of ultrasonic scattering measurements to obtain average differential scattering cross sections for tissues. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Samuel A Wickline,et al.  Targeted ultrasonic contrast agents for molecular imaging and therapy. , 2001, Current problems in cardiology.

[23]  E. Madsen,et al.  Method of data reduction for accurate determination of acoustic backscatter coefficients. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  K. Ley,et al.  Ultrasound Assessment of Inflammation and Renal Tissue Injury With Microbubbles Targeted to P-Selectin , 2001, Circulation.

[25]  K.K. Shung,et al.  In vivo measurements of ultrasonic backscattering in blood , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[26]  John M. Reid,et al.  Analysis and measurement of ultrasound backscattering from an ensemble of scatterers excited by sine‐wave bursts , 1973 .

[27]  J W Baish,et al.  Fractals and cancer. , 2000, Cancer research.