Worldwide Evaluation of DNA Sequencing Approaches for Identification of Drug Resistance Mutations in the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Reverse Transcriptase

ABSTRACT A panel (ENVA-1) of well-defined blinded samples containing wild-type and mutant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase was analyzed by automated DNA sequencing in 23 laboratories worldwide. Drug resistance mutations at codons 41, 215, and 184 were present in the panel samples at different ratios to the wild type. The presence of mutant genotypes was determined qualitatively and quantitatively. All laboratories reported the presence of sequence heterogeneities at codons 41, 215, and 184 in one or more of the panel samples, though not all reported the correct codon genotypes. Two laboratories reported a mutant genotype in samples containing only the wild type, whereas two and three laboratories failed to detect the mutant genotypes at codons 41 and 215, respectively, in a completely mutant DNA population. Mutations present at relative concentrations of 25% of the total DNA population were successfully identified by 13 of 23, 10 of 23, and 16 of 23 labs for codons 41, 215, and 184Val, respectively. For more than 80% of those laboratories that qualitatively detected the presence of a mutation correctly, the estimated wild type/mutant ratio was less than 25% different from the input ratio in those samples containing 25 to 50% or 75% mutant input. This first multicenter study on the quality of DNA sequencing approaches for identifying HIV-1 drug resistance mutations revealed large interlaboratory differences in the quality of the results. The application of these procedures in their current state would in several cases lead to inaccurate or even incorrect diagnostic results. Therefore, proper quality control and standardization are urgently needed.

[1]  T. Leitner,et al.  Stochastic processes strongly influence HIV-1 evolution during suboptimal protease-inhibitor therapy. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  R. Shafer,et al.  Interlaboratory concordance of DNA sequence analysis to detect reverse transcriptase mutations in HIV-1 proviral DNA. ACTG Sequencing Working Group. AIDS Clinical Trials Group. , 1998, Journal of virological methods.

[3]  A. Telenti,et al.  HIV treatment failure: testing for HIV resistance in clinical practice. , 1998, Science.

[4]  R. Schuurman STATE OF THE ART OF GENOTYPIC HIV-1 DRUG RESISTANCE , 1997 .

[5]  C. Boucher,et al.  HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION FOR RAPID PHENOTYPING OF HIV , 1997 .

[6]  C. Heiner,et al.  New dye-labeled terminators for improved DNA sequencing patterns. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  D. Richman,et al.  HIV-1: Gambling on the evolution of drug resistance? , 1997, Nature Medicine.

[8]  C. Boucher,et al.  Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug susceptibility determination by using recombinant viruses generated from patient sera tested in a cell-killing assay , 1996, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.

[9]  N. Shen,et al.  Extensive polymorphisms observed in HIV–1 clade B protease gene using high–density oligonucleotide arrays , 1996, Nature Medicine.

[10]  J. Sninsky,et al.  Rapid changes in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA load and appearance of drug-resistant virus populations in persons treated with lamivudine (3TC). , 1995, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[11]  J. Coffin,et al.  HIV population dynamics in vivo: implications for genetic variation, pathogenesis, and therapy , 1995, Science.

[12]  V. Johnson,et al.  Standardized peripheral blood mononuclear cell culture assay for determination of drug susceptibilities of clinical human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates. The RV-43 Study Group, the AIDS Clinical Trials Group Virology Committee Resistance Working Group , 1993, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[13]  C. Loveday,et al.  A microtitre format point mutation assay: Application to the detection of drug resistance in human immunodeficiency virus type‐1 infected patients treated with zidovudine , 1992, Journal of medical virology.

[14]  M. Pistello,et al.  Simple in vitro methods for titrating feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) and FIV neutralizing antibodies. , 1992, Journal of virological methods.

[15]  K Kontula,et al.  A primer-guided nucleotide incorporation assay in the genotyping of apolipoprotein E. , 1990, Genomics.

[16]  B. Larder,et al.  Mutations in Retroviral Genes Associated with Drug Resistance , 1996 .

[17]  D. Kuritzkes,et al.  Drug resistance and virologic response in NUCA 3001, a randomized trial of lamivudine (3TC) versus zidovudine (ZDV) versus ZDV plus 3TC in previously untreated patients , 1996, AIDS.