A comparison of different methods for handling measurements affected by medication use

In epidemiological research it is common to encounter measurements affected by medication use, such as blood pressure lowered by antihypertensive drugs. When one is interested in the relation between the variables not affected by medication, ignoring medication use can cause bias. Several methods have been proposed, but the problem is often ignored or handled with generic methods, such as excluding individuals on medication or adjusting for medication use in the analysis. This study aimed to investigate methods for handling measurements affected by medication use when one is interested in the relation between the unaffected variables and to provide guidance for how to optimally handle the problem. We focused on linear regression and distinguish between the situation where the affected measurement is an exposure, confounder or outcome. In the Netherlands Epidemiology of Obesity study and in several simulated settings, we compared generic and more advanced methods, such as substituting or adding a fixed value to the treated values, regression calibration, censored normal regression, Heckmans treatment model and multiple imputation methods. We found that often-used methods such as adjusting for medication use could result in substantial bias and that methods for handling medication use should be chosen cautiously.

[1]  J. A. Delaney,et al.  A method to account for covariate-specific treatment effects when estimating biomarker associations in the presence of endogenous medication use , 2018, Statistical methods in medical research.

[2]  Maarten van Smeden,et al.  Random measurement error: Why worry? An example of cardiovascular risk factors , 2018, PloS one.

[3]  R. Hanson,et al.  Effect of different methods of accounting for antihypertensive treatment when assessing the relationship between diabetes or obesity and systolic blood pressure. , 2017, Journal of diabetes and its complications.

[4]  Sylvie Chevret,et al.  A multiple imputation approach for MNAR mechanisms compatible with Heckman's model , 2016, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  J. A. Delaney,et al.  Evaluating the treatment effects model for estimation of cross‐sectional associations between risk factors and cardiovascular biomarkers influenced by medication use , 2015, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[6]  Margreet Kloppenburg,et al.  The Netherlands Epidemiology of Obesity (NEO) study: study design and data collection , 2013, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[7]  Stef van Buuren,et al.  MICE: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R , 2011 .

[8]  M. Tobin,et al.  Pharmacogenetic interactions and their potential effects on genetic analyses of blood pressure , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  S. Cole,et al.  Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider. , 2010, International journal of epidemiology.

[10]  Robyn L McClelland,et al.  Estimation of risk factor associations when the response is influenced by medication use: An imputation approach , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  Theo Stijnen,et al.  Using the outcome for imputation of missing predictor values was preferred. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  Ian R White,et al.  Commentary: dealing with measurement error: multiple imputation or regression calibration? , 2006, International journal of epidemiology.

[13]  Nuala A Sheehan,et al.  Adjusting for treatment effects in studies of quantitative traits: antihypertensive therapy and systolic blood pressure , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  J. Robins,et al.  A Structural Approach to Selection Bias , 2004, Epidemiology.

[15]  Ian R White,et al.  The use of regression models for medians when observed outcomes may be modified by interventions , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  S. Harrap,et al.  Antihypertensive Treatments Obscure Familial Contributions to Blood Pressure Variation , 2003, Hypertension.

[17]  J. Pankow,et al.  Genome Scans for Blood Pressure and Hypertension: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study* , 2002, Hypertension.

[18]  C. Lewis,et al.  Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study: Final Results , 1993 .

[19]  D. Relles,et al.  Theory Testing in a World of Constrained Research Design , 1990 .

[20]  Finis Welch,et al.  What Do We Really Know about Wages? The Importance of Nonreporting and Census Imputation , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.