Stochastic independence for upper and lower probabilities in a coherent setting

In this paper we extend to upper and lower probabilities our approach to independence, based solely on conditional probability (in a coherent setting). Most difficulties arise (when this notion is put forward in the classical framework) either from the introduction of marginals for upper and lower probabilities (often improperly called, in the relevant literature, "imprecise" probabilities) when trying to extend to them the "product rule", or from the different ways of introducing conditioning for upper and lower probabilities. Our approach to conditioning in the context of "imprecise" probabilities is instead the most natural: in fact its starting point refers to a direct definition (through coherence) of the "enveloping" conditional "precise" probabilities. The discussion of some critical examples seems to suggest that the intuitive aspects of independence are better captured by referring to just one (precise) probability than to a family (such as that one singling-out a lower or upper probability).

[1]  Luis M. de Campos,et al.  Independence Concepts for Convex Sets of Probabilities , 1995, UAI.

[2]  Romano Scozzafava,et al.  The role of coherence in eliciting and handling imprecise probabilities and its application to medical diagnosis , 2000, Inf. Sci..

[3]  Giulianella Coletti,et al.  Stochastic Independence in a Coherent Setting , 2004, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[4]  Romano Scozzafava,et al.  Characterization of coherent Conditional Probabilities as a Tool for their Assessment and Extension , 1996, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[5]  A. Rényi,et al.  On Conditional Probability Spaces Generated by a Dimensionally Ordered Set of Measures , 1956 .

[6]  L. Dubins Finitely Additive Conditional Probabilities, Conglomerability and Disintegrations , 1975 .

[7]  Giulianella Coletti,et al.  Probabilistic Reasoning as a General Unifying Tool , 2001, ECSQARU.

[8]  Inés Couso,et al.  Examples of Independence for Imprecise Probabilities , 1999, ISIPTA.

[9]  Barbara Vantaggi,et al.  Conditional Independence in A Coherent Finite Setting , 2001, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[10]  Wolfgang Spohn,et al.  Ranking Functions, AGM Style , 1999 .

[11]  P. Krauss,et al.  Representation of conditional probability measures on Boolean algebras , 1968 .

[12]  Dario Mancini,et al.  NEW TRENDS IN FUZZY SYSTEMS , 1998 .

[13]  Giulianella Coletti,et al.  Conditioning and inference in intelligent systems , 1999, Soft Comput..