Distinguishing between forensic science and forensic pseudoscience: testing of validity and reliability, and approaches to forensic voice comparison.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Geoffrey Stewart Morrison,et al. Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems. , 2011, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.
[2] G. Morrison. The Likelihood-Ratio Framework and Forensic Evidence in Court: A Response to R v T , 2012 .
[3] D. Balding. Weight-of-Evidence for Forensic DNA Profiles , 2005 .
[4] Didier Meuwly. Reconnaissance de locuteurs en sciences forensiques: l'apport d'une approche automatique , 2000 .
[5] Harry Hollien,et al. Forensic Voice Identification , 2001 .
[6] Tharmarajah Thiruvaran,et al. Database selection for forensic voice comparison , 2012, Odyssey.
[7] Francis Nolan,et al. The Phonetic Bases of Speaker Recognition , 1983 .
[8] Peter French,et al. Position Statement concerning use of impressionistic likelihood terms in forensic speaker comparison cases, with a foreword by Peter French & Philip Harrison , 2007 .
[9] C. Aitken,et al. Expressing evaluative opinions: a position statement , 2011 .
[10] Geoffrey Stewart Morrison,et al. Tutorial on logistic-regression calibration and fusion:converting a score to a likelihood ratio , 2013, 2104.08846.
[11] Herbert J. Oyer,et al. Experiment on Voice Identification , 1972 .
[12] Phil Rose,et al. A response to the UK position statement on forensic speaker comparison , 2009 .
[13] Law. Policy. Executive Summary of the National Academies of Science Reports, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward , 2009 .
[14] J. Epstein. Latent Print Examination and Human Factors: Improving the Practice through a Systems Approach, The Report of the Expert Working Group on Human Factors in Latent Print Analysis , 2012 .
[15] F S Cooper,et al. Speaker identification by speech spectrograms: a scientists' view of its reliability for legal purposes. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] B E Koenig. Spectrographic voice identification: a forensic survey. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] Oscar Tosi,et al. Voice identification: Theory and legal applications , 1979 .
[18] Philip Rose. Forensic Speaker Identification , 2002 .
[19] Philip Harrison,et al. The UK position statement on forensic speaker comparison; a rejoinder to Rose and Morrison , 2010 .
[20] F S Cooper,et al. Letter: Speaker identification by speech spectrograms; some further observations. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] Peter French,et al. International practices in forensic speaker comparison , 2011 .
[22] P. R. Bevington,et al. Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences , 1969 .
[23] Durand R. Begault,et al. VOICE IDENTIFICATION AND ELIMINATION USING AURAL- SPECTROGRAPHIC PROTOCOLS , 2005 .
[24] Colin Aitken,et al. The use of statistics in forensic science , 1991 .
[25] Philip Rose,et al. Protocol for the collection of databases of recordings for forensic-voice-comparison research and practice , 2012 .
[26] Geoffrey Stewart Morrison,et al. Forensic Voice Comparison , 2015 .
[27] Geoffrey Stewart Morrison,et al. Forensic voice comparison and the paradigm shift. , 2009, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.
[28] Simon A. Cole. ACCULTURATING FORENSIC SCIENCE: WHAT IS ‘SCIENTIFIC CULTURE’, AND HOW CAN FORENSIC SCIENCE ADOPT IT? , 2010 .