Children's Sentential Complement Use Leads the Theory of Mind Development Period: Evidence from the CHILDES Corpus

Converging evidence suggests that children’s linguistic and theory of mind (ToM) development are linked. Specifically, learning the sentential complement grammatical structure has been shown to play a causal role in the development of some false belief reasoning skills. Here, we extend this line of work to examine this relationship in the wild by means of a corpus analysis of children’s speech during the typical period of ToM development. We show that children’s use of the sentential complement grammatical structure increases immediately preceding the ToM development period and plateaus shortly thereafter. Furthermore, we find that parents’ child-directed speech follows a similar pattern.

[1]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  False-belief understanding i 2.5-year-olds: evidence for violation-of-expectation change-of-location and unexpected-contents tasks. , 2011, Developmental science.

[2]  M. Sabbagh,et al.  Sentential complements and false belief understanding in Chinese Mandarin-speaking preschoolers: A training study , 2014 .

[3]  Chris Pratt,et al.  The development of children's theory of mind: The working memory explanation , 1995 .

[4]  Franziska Maria Köder Between direct and indirect speech , 2016 .

[5]  Helen Tager-Flusberg,et al.  The influence of language on theory of mind: a training study. , 2003, Developmental science.

[6]  H. Wellman,et al.  Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks. , 2004, Child development.

[7]  M. Tomasello,et al.  The role of language in the development of false belief understanding: a training study. , 2003, Child development.

[8]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  False-belief understanding in infants , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  Bootstrapping from Language in the Analogical Theory of Mind Model , 2018, CogSci.

[10]  Tomasello,et al.  The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech , 2001 .

[11]  Jennie E. Pyers,et al.  Complements to cognition: a longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false-belief-understanding , 2002 .

[12]  Jennie E. Pyers,et al.  Complementing Cognition: The Relationship between Language and Theory of Mind , 1997 .

[13]  J. Astington,et al.  Language and theory of mind: meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. , 2007, Child development.

[14]  Ian Apperly,et al.  False belief reasoning and the acquisition of relative clause sentences. , 2003, Child development.

[16]  Jill de Villiers,et al.  Language for thought: Coming to understand false beliefs , 2003 .

[17]  G. Diesendruck,et al.  The influence of language and socioeconomic status on children's understanding of false belief. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[18]  Alon Lavie,et al.  High-accuracy Annotation and Parsing of CHILDES Transcripts , 2007 .

[19]  J. Perner,et al.  Development of theory of mind and executive control , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.