An Empirical Evaluation of Supervised Dimensionality Reduction for Recognition

In the literature, many dimensionality reduction methods have been proposed and applied to recognition tasks, including handwritten digits recognition, character recognition and string recognition. However, it is usually difficult for the researchers to decide which method is the optimal choice for the problem at hand. In this paper, we empirically compare some supervised dimensionality reduction methods on handwritten digits recognition, English letter recognition and ancient Arabic sub word recognition, to evaluate their performance on the recognition tasks. These compared methods include traditional linear dimensionality reduction approach (linear discriminant analysis, LDA), locality-based manifold learning approach (marginal Fisher analysis, MFA) and relational learning approach (probabilistic relational principal component analysis, PRPCA). Experimental results and statistical tests show that locality-based manifold learning approach (MFA) generally performs well in terms of recognition accuracy, but with high computational complexity, traditional linear dimensionality reduction approach (LDA) is efficient, but not necessarily to deliver the best result, relational learning approach (PRPCA) is promising, and more efforts should be dedicated to this area.

[1]  Nicolas Le Roux,et al.  Out-of-Sample Extensions for LLE, Isomap, MDS, Eigenmaps, and Spectral Clustering , 2003, NIPS.

[2]  S T Roweis,et al.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. , 2000, Science.

[3]  Zhihua Zhang,et al.  Probabilistic Relational PCA , 2009, NIPS.

[4]  Wu-Jun Li,et al.  Gaussian Process Latent Random Field , 2010, AAAI.

[5]  Rich Caruana,et al.  An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms , 2006, ICML.

[6]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[7]  Cheng-Lin Liu,et al.  Error-correcting output codes based ensemble feature extraction , 2013, Pattern Recognit..

[8]  Michael E. Tipping,et al.  Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis , 1999 .

[9]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Shape Analysis of Elastic Curves in Euclidean Spaces , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Supervised Locally Linear Embedding , 2003, ICANN.

[11]  J. Friedman Regularized Discriminant Analysis , 1989 .

[12]  Stephen Lin,et al.  Graph Embedding and Extensions: A General Framework for Dimensionality Reduction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[13]  Tao Jiang,et al.  Efficient and robust feature extraction by maximum margin criterion , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[14]  David M. Blei,et al.  Connections between the lines: augmenting social networks with text , 2009, KDD.

[15]  Mikhail Belkin,et al.  Laplacian Eigenmaps for Dimensionality Reduction and Data Representation , 2003, Neural Computation.

[16]  Mohamed Cheriet,et al.  A prototype system for handwritten sub-word recognition: Toward Arabic-manuscript transliteration , 2012, 2012 11th International Conference on Information Science, Signal Processing and their Applications (ISSPA).

[17]  Mohamed Cheriet,et al.  W-TSV: Weighted topological signature vector for lexicon reduction in handwritten Arabic documents , 2012, Pattern Recognit..

[18]  Eric O. Postma,et al.  Dimensionality Reduction: A Comparative Review , 2008 .

[19]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.

[20]  Rich Caruana,et al.  An empirical evaluation of supervised learning in high dimensions , 2008, ICML '08.

[21]  David M. Blei,et al.  Relational Topic Models for Document Networks , 2009, AISTATS.

[22]  R. Fisher THE USE OF MULTIPLE MEASUREMENTS IN TAXONOMIC PROBLEMS , 1936 .

[23]  Zhi-Hua Zhou,et al.  Supervised nonlinear dimensionality reduction for visualization and classification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[24]  Robert P. W. Duin,et al.  Relational discriminant analysis , 1999, Pattern Recognit. Lett..