A Mechanistic, Multiscale Mathematical Model of Immunogenicity for Therapeutic Proteins: Part 2—Model Applications

A mechanistic, multiscale mathematical model of immunogenicity for therapeutic proteins was built by recapitulating key underlying known biological processes for immunogenicity. The model is able to simulate immune responses based on protein‐specific antigenic properties (e.g., number of T‐epitopes and their major histocompatibility complex (MHC)‐II binding affinities) and host‐specific immunological/physiological characteristics (e.g., MHC‐II allele genotype, drug clearance rate). Preliminary validation was performed using mouse studies with antigens such as ovalbumin (OVA) or OVA‐derived peptide. Further, using adalimumab as an example therapeutic protein, the model is able to simulate immune responses against adalimumab in individual subjects and in a population, and also provides estimations of immunogenicity incidence and drug exposure reduction that can be validated experimentally. This is a first attempt at modeling immunogenicity of biologics, so the model simulations should be used to help understand the immunogenicity mechanisms and impacting factors, rather than making direct predictions. This prototype model needs to be subjected to extensive experimental validation and refinement before fulfilling its ultimate mission of predicting immunogenicity. Nevertheless, the current model could potentially set up the starting framework to integrate various in silico, in vitro, in vivo, and clinical immunogenicity assessment results to help meet the challenge of immunogenicity prediction.

[1]  P. Mease Adalimumab in the treatment of arthritis , 2007, Therapeutics and clinical risk management.

[2]  H. Paulus,et al.  Efficacy, pharmacokinetic, and safety assessment of adalimumab, a fully human anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha monoclonal antibody, in adults with rheumatoid arthritis receiving concomitant methotrexate: a pilot study. , 2003, Clinical therapeutics.

[3]  G. Li Pira,et al.  High Throughput T Epitope Mapping and Vaccine Development , 2010, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[4]  Søren Buus,et al.  Functional recombinant MHC class II molecules and high-throughput peptide-binding assays , 2009, Immunome research.

[5]  Avner Schlessinger,et al.  Towards a consensus on datasets and evaluation metrics for developing B‐cell epitope prediction tools , 2007, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[6]  R. Velagapudi,et al.  Bioavailability of adalimumab following subcutaneous injections in rheumatoid arthritis patients , 2005 .

[7]  F. Armbruster,et al.  Immunogenicity, efficacy and adverse events of adalimumab in RA patients , 2006, Rheumatology International.

[8]  G. I. Bell,et al.  Mathematical Model of Clonal Selection and Antibody Production , 1970, Nature.

[9]  C. Lubich,et al.  CD4+ T-cell epitopes associated with antibody responses after intravenously and subcutaneously applied human FVIII in humanized hemophilic E17 HLA-DRB1*1501 mice. , 2012, Blood.

[10]  Marion Pepper,et al.  Naive CD4(+) T cell frequency varies for different epitopes and predicts repertoire diversity and response magnitude. , 2007, Immunity.

[11]  P. Rutgeerts,et al.  Influence of trough serum levels and immunogenicity on long-term outcome of adalimumab therapy in Crohn's disease. , 2009, Gastroenterology.

[12]  J. Kalden,et al.  Combination therapy of the chimeric monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody (infliximab) with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 1999, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[13]  Morten Nielsen,et al.  Peptide binding predictions for HLA DR, DP and DQ molecules , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[14]  N. Chirmule,et al.  Considerations for optimization and validation of an in vitro PBMC derived T cell assay for immunogenicity prediction of biotherapeutics. , 2010, Clinical immunology.

[15]  S. Caoili Benchmarking B-Cell Epitope Prediction for the Design of Peptide-Based Vaccines: Problems and Prospects , 2010, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[16]  M. Sykes,et al.  Antigen-specific human T-cell responses and T cell-dependent production of human antibodies in a humanized mouse model. , 2008, Blood.

[17]  Morten Nielsen,et al.  Prediction of MHC class II binding affinity using SMM-align, a novel stabilization matrix alignment method , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[18]  R. Garman,et al.  Immune tolerance induction to enzyme‐replacement therapy by co‐administration of short‐term, low‐dose methotrexate in a murine Pompe disease model , 2008, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[19]  John Sidney,et al.  A Systematic Assessment of MHC Class II Peptide Binding Predictions and Evaluation of a Consensus Approach , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  R. Garman,et al.  Methotrexate reduces antibody responses to recombinant human α‐galactosidase A therapy in a mouse model of Fabry disease , 2004, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[21]  Bjoern Peters,et al.  Automated generation and evaluation of specific MHC binding predictive tools: ARB matrix applications , 2005, Immunogenetics.

[22]  J. Soothill,et al.  Absorption of antigens after oral immunisation and the simultaneous induction of specific systemic tolerance. , 1979, Gut.

[23]  Magdalena Plebanski,et al.  Methods for nano-particle based vaccine formulation and evaluation of their immunogenicity. , 2006, Methods.

[24]  Massimo Bernaschi,et al.  Computational modeling of the immune response to tumor antigens , 2005 .

[25]  J. Linderman,et al.  Mathematical modeling of helper T lymphocyte/antigen-presenting cell interactions: analysis of methods for modifying antigen processing and presentation. , 1996, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  Andreas Radbruch,et al.  Survival of long-lived plasma cells is independent of antigen. , 1998, International immunology.

[27]  C Oseroff,et al.  Development of high potency universal DR-restricted helper epitopes by modification of high affinity DR-blocking peptides. , 1994, Immunity.

[28]  H. Rammensee,et al.  SYFPEITHI: database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs , 1999, Immunogenetics.

[29]  Ellis L. Reinherz,et al.  Enhancement to the RANKPEP resource for the prediction of peptide binding to MHC molecules using profiles , 2004, Immunogenetics.

[30]  A. Coutinho,et al.  A model of the immune network with B-T cell co-operation. I--Prototypical structures and dynamics. , 1996, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  P. V. van Riel,et al.  Formation of antibodies against infliximab and adalimumab strongly correlates with functional drug levels and clinical responses in rheumatoid arthritis , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[32]  A. Perelson,et al.  Simulation and Prediction of the Adaptive Immune Response to Influenza A Virus Infection , 2009, Journal of Virology.

[33]  A. Sette,et al.  Altered Ligands Reveal Limited Plasticity in the T Cell Response to a Pathogenic Epitope , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[34]  E. Kuipers,et al.  Immunogenicity negatively influences the outcome of adalimumab treatment in Crohn’s disease , 2008, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[35]  Robert M. Plenge,et al.  Defining the Role of the MHC in Autoimmunity: A Review and Pooled Analysis , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[36]  M. Cesta Normal Structure, Function, and Histology of the Spleen , 2006, Toxicologic pathology.

[37]  Gajendra PS Raghava,et al.  Identification of B-cell epitopes in an antigen for inducing specific class of antibodies , 2013, Biology Direct.

[38]  D. Burshtyn,et al.  Dynamics of peptide binding to purified antibody-bound H-2Db and H-2Db beta 2m complexes. , 1993, Journal of immunology.

[39]  Forest M White,et al.  Analysis of MHC Class II Antigen Processing by Quantitation of Peptides that Constitute Nested Sets , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[40]  E. Shevach,et al.  Proliferative Assays for T Cell Function , 2004, Current protocols in immunology.