Knowledge diffusion in the collaboration hypernetwork

As knowledge constitutes a primary productive force, it is important to understand the performance of knowledge diffusion. In this paper, we present a knowledge diffusion model based on the local-world non-uniform hypernetwork, which introduces the preferential diffusion mechanism and the knowledge absorptive capability αj, where αj is correlated with the hyperdegree dH(j) of node j. At each time step, we randomly select a node i as the sender; a receiver node is selected from the set of nodes that the sender i has published with previously, with probability proportional to the number of papers they have published together. Applying the average knowledge stock V¯(t), the variance σ2(t) and the variance coefficient c(t) of knowledge stock to measure the growth and diffusion of knowledge and the adequacy of knowledge diffusion, we have made 3 groups of comparative experiments to investigate how different network structures, hypernetwork sizes and knowledge evolution mechanisms affect the knowledge diffusion, respectively. As the diffusion mechanisms based on the hypernetwork combine with the hyperdegree of node, the hypernetwork is more suitable for investigating the performance of knowledge diffusion. Therefore, the proposed model could be helpful for deeply understanding the process of the knowledge diffusion in the collaboration hypernetwork.

[1]  Robin Cowan,et al.  On the Creation of Networks and Knowledge , 2004 .

[2]  Jean-Benoît Zimmermann,et al.  On the Frontier: Structural Effects in a Diffusion Model based on Influence Matrixes , 1998 .

[3]  Beth E Allen,et al.  Some Stochastic Processes of Interdependent Demand and Technological Diffusion of an Innovation Exhibiting Externalities Among Adopters , 1982 .

[4]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[5]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[6]  Haoxiang Xia,et al.  Adjustment of knowledge-connection structure affects the performance of knowledge transfer , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Nina V Fedoroff The Global Knowledge Society , 2012, Science.

[8]  Richard Taylor,et al.  Small World Dynamics and The Process of Knowledge Diffusion: The Case of The Metropolitan Area of Greater Santiago De Chile , 2004, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[9]  Nicholas M. Kiefer,et al.  Local externalities and societal adoption of technologies , 1995 .

[10]  Douglas L. MacLachlan,et al.  Disseminative capacity, organizational structure and knowledge transfer , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Jun Ma,et al.  Estimating the effect of organizational structure on knowledge transfer: A neural network approach , 2006, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2004 .

[13]  Min Lin,et al.  Scale-free network provides an optimal pattern for knowledge transfer , 2010 .

[14]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.

[15]  Zhao-Guo Xuan,et al.  Weighted network properties of Chinese nature science basic research , 2007 .

[16]  Zhao-Long Hu,et al.  A Knowledge Generation Model via the Hypernetwork , 2014, PloS one.

[17]  Jian-Wei Wang,et al.  Evolving hypernetwork model , 2010 .

[18]  Yanzhong Dang,et al.  Complex network properties of Chinese natural science basic research , 2006 .

[19]  Richard Taylor,et al.  Knowledge diffusion dynamics and network properties of face-to-face interactions , 2004 .

[20]  Feng Hu,et al.  An evolving hypernetwork model and its properties , 2013 .

[21]  Yongtae Park,et al.  Structural effects of R&D collaboration network on knowledge diffusion performance , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  Guang-Yong Yang,et al.  A local-world evolving hypernetwork model , 2014 .