Distribution of Inflammation Within Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques With High-Risk Morphological Features: A Comparison Between Positron Emission Tomography Activity, Plaque Morphology, and Histopathology

Background— Several high-risk morphological features (HRM) of plaques, especially in combination, are associated with an increased risk of a clinical event. Although plaque inflammation is also associated with atherothrombosis, the relationship between inflammation and number of HRM is not well understood. Methods and Results— Thirty-four patients underwent 18flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging, and carotid atherosclerotic inflammation was assessed (target-to-background ratio). Additionally, in a subset of 10 subjects with carotid stenosis who underwent carotid endarterectomy, inflammation was histologically assessed (CD68 staining). Vessel wall morphology was examined using computed tomography for the presence of visible plaque and presence of 3 HRM: positive remodeling, luminal irregularity, and low attenuation. A total of 100 vascular segments were analyzed, of which 69 contained visible plaque (26 plaques with ≥1 HRM). Inflammation, by FDG uptake (target-to-background ratio), was higher in plaques with (versus without) HRM (mean±SEM: 2.21±0.20 versus 1.66±0.07, P=0.0003) and increased with the number of HRM observed (P<0.001 for trend). Similarly, inflammation within atherosclerotic specimens (% CD68 staining) was higher in plaques with (versus without) HRM (median [interquartile range]: 10 [0, 19.85] versus 0 [0, 1.55], P=0.01) and increased with the number of HRM observed (P<0.001 for trend). Conclusions— Inflammation, as assessed by both FDG uptake and histology, is increased in plaques containing HRM and increases with increasing number of HRM. These data support the concept that inflammation accumulates relative to the burden of morphological abnormalities.

[1]  H. Sillesen,et al.  18FDG PET and ultrasound echolucency in carotid artery plaques. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[2]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[3]  H. Sillesen,et al.  Gene expression and 18FDG uptake in atherosclerotic carotid plaques , 2010, Nuclear medicine communications.

[4]  V. Fuster,et al.  Multimodality imaging of atherosclerotic plaque activity and composition using FDG-PET/CT and MRI in carotid and femoral arteries. , 2009, Atherosclerosis.

[5]  M. Reiser,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT Identifies Patients at Risk for Future Vascular Events in an Otherwise Asymptomatic Cohort with Neoplastic Disease , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  R W Günther,et al.  Carotid plaque analysis: comparison of dual-source computed tomography (CT) findings and histopathological correlation. , 2009, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[7]  E. Braunwald Noninvasive detection of vulnerable coronary plaques: Locking the barn door before the horse is stolen. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  Hirofumi Anno,et al.  Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  V. Fuster,et al.  Relationships Among Regional Arterial Inflammation, Calcification, Risk Factors, and Biomarkers: A Prospective Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Study , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[10]  P. Libby,et al.  Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  P. Rothwell,et al.  Critical Cap Thickness and Rupture in Symptomatic Carotid Plaques: The Oxford Plaque Study , 2008, Stroke.

[12]  Marc Faraggi,et al.  Arterial wall uptake of fluorodeoxyglucose on PET imaging in stable cancer disease patients indicates higher risk for cardiovascular events , 2008, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[13]  V. Fuster,et al.  (18)Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging of atherosclerotic plaque inflammation is highly reproducible: implications for atherosclerosis therapy trials. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Hirofumi Anno,et al.  Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  C. Kramer,et al.  The Impact of Expansive Arterial Remodeling on Clinical Presentation in Carotid Artery Disease: A Multidetector CT Angiography Study , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[16]  L. Saba,et al.  CT and Ultrasound in the Study of Ulcerated Carotid Plaque Compared with Surgical Results: Potentialities and Advantages of Multidetector Row CT Angiography , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[17]  P J Gallagher,et al.  Histological Assessment of 526 Symptomatic Carotid Plaques in Relation to the Nature and Timing of Ischemic Symptoms: The Oxford Plaque Study , 2006, Circulation.

[18]  Masatoshi Ishibashi,et al.  Simvastatin attenuates plaque inflammation: evaluation by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  Ahmed Tawakol,et al.  In vivo 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging provides a noninvasive measure of carotid plaque inflammation in patients. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data , 2006, The Lancet.

[21]  Martin J Graves,et al.  Identification of Culprit Lesions After Transient Ischemic Attack by Combined 18F Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron-Emission Tomography and High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2005, Stroke.

[22]  D. Schrijvers,et al.  Phagocytosis of Apoptotic Cells by Macrophages Is Impaired in Atherosclerosis , 2005, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[23]  Ahmed Tawakol,et al.  Noninvasive in vivo measurement of vascular inflammation with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography , 2005, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[24]  Elena Bonanno,et al.  Extracranial thrombotically active carotid plaque as a risk factor for ischemic stroke. , 2004, JAMA.

[25]  P. Rothwell,et al.  Histological Correlates of Carotid Plaque Surface Morphology on Lumen Contrast Imaging , 2004, Circulation.

[26]  Renu Virmani,et al.  Vulnerable plaque: the pathology of unstable coronary lesions. , 2002, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[27]  J. Pickard,et al.  Imaging Atherosclerotic Plaque Inflammation With [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography , 2002, Circulation.

[28]  Z. Galis,et al.  Expansive Arterial Remodeling Is Associated With Increased Neointimal Macrophage Foam Cell Content: The Murine Model of Macrophage-Rich Carotid Artery Lesions , 2002, Circulation.

[29]  M. Davies,et al.  Relationship Between Coronary Artery Remodeling and Plaque Vulnerability , 2002, Circulation.

[30]  Renu Virmani,et al.  Morphological Predictors of Arterial Remodeling in Coronary Atherosclerosis , 2002, Circulation.

[31]  R. Wahl,et al.  Detection of atherosclerosis using a novel positron-sensitive probe and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) , 2001, Nuclear medicine communications.

[32]  Z. Galis,et al.  Remodeling of Carotid Artery Is Associated With Increased Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Mouse Blood Flow Cessation Model , 2000, Circulation.

[33]  G. Pasterkamp,et al.  Atherosclerotic arterial remodeling and the localization of macrophages and matrix metalloproteases 1, 2 and 9 in the human coronary artery. , 2000, Atherosclerosis.

[34]  P. Rothwell,et al.  Interrelation between plaque surface morphology and degree of stenosis on carotid angiograms and the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. On behalf of the European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. , 2000, Stroke.

[35]  S E Nissen,et al.  Extent and direction of arterial remodeling in stable versus unstable coronary syndromes : an intravascular ultrasound study. , 2000, Circulation.

[36]  J. Wardlaw,et al.  Atherosclerotic plaque at the carotid bifurcation: CT angiographic appearance with histopathologic correlation. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[37]  H. Steinmetz,et al.  Inflammation in high-grade carotid stenosis: a possible role for macrophages and T cells in plaque destabilization. , 1998, Stroke.

[38]  S. Glagov,et al.  Juxtalumenal location of plaque necrosis and neoformation in symptomatic carotid stenosis. , 1997, Journal of vascular surgery.

[39]  Allan J. Fox,et al.  Significance of Plaque Ulceration in Symptomatic Patients With High‐Grade Carotid Stenosis , 1994, Stroke.