Deformation of biological cells in the acoustic field of an oscillating bubble.

In this work we develop a theoretical framework of the interaction of microbubbles with bacteria in the ultrasound field using a shell model of the bacteria, following an approach developed previously [P. V. Zinin, Phys. Rev. E 72, 61907 (2005)]. Within the shell model, the motion of the cell in an ultrasonic field is determined by the motion of three components: the internal viscous fluid, a thin elastic shell, and the surrounding viscous fluid. Several conclusions can be drawn from the modeling of sound interaction with a biological cell: (a) the characteristics of a cell's oscillations in an ultrasonic field are determined both by the elastic properties of the shell the viscosities of all components of the system, (b) for dipole quadrupole oscillations the cell's shell deforms due to a change in the shell area this oscillation depends on the surface area modulus K{A} , (c) the relative change in the area has a maximum at frequency f{K} approximately 1/2pi square root[K{A}(rhoa;{3})] , where a is the cell's radius and rho is its density. It was predicted that deformation of the cell wall at the frequency f{K} is high enough to rupture small bacteria such as E . coli in which the quality factor of natural vibrations is less than 1 (Q<1). For bacteria with high value quality factors (Q>1) , the area deformation has a strong peak near a resonance frequency f{K} however, the value of the deformation near the resonance frequency is not high enough to produce sufficient mechanical effect. The theoretical framework developed in this work can be extended for describing the deformation of a biological cell under any arbitrary, external periodic force including radiation forces unduced by acoustical (acoustical levitation) or optical waves (optical tweezers).

[1]  Bernard Nysten,et al.  Nanoscale mapping of the elasticity of microbial cells by atomic force microscopy , 2003 .

[2]  Koichi Ogawa,et al.  Induction of cell-membrane porosity by ultrasound , 1999, The Lancet.

[3]  Masson-Delmotte,et al.  The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[4]  J. Lock Calculation of the radiation trapping force for laser tweezers by use of generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. II. On-axis trapping force. , 2004, Applied optics.

[5]  J. Brunstedt,et al.  Sonication: A new method for gene transfer to plants , 1992 .

[6]  Yusuf Chisti,et al.  Sonobioreactors: using ultrasound for enhanced microbial productivity. , 2003, Trends in biotechnology.

[7]  V. V. Novozhilov,et al.  Thin shell theory , 1964 .

[8]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Ultrasound-induced encapsulated microbubble phenomena. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  D. Boal,et al.  Mechanics of the cell , 2001 .

[10]  Ulrich Parlitz,et al.  Bjerknes forces between small cavitation bubbles in a strong acoustic field , 1997 .

[11]  Thierry Bettinger,et al.  Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure: implication for drug delivery. , 2005, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[12]  K E Moxham,et al.  The mechanical properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Theoretical investigation of the response of gas‐filled micropores and cavitation nuclei to ultrasound , 1983 .

[14]  E. Evans,et al.  Structure and deformation properties of red blood cells: concepts and quantitative methods. , 1989, Methods in enzymology.

[15]  Martin Karplus,et al.  Normal mode calculations of icosahedral viruses with full dihedral flexibility by use of molecular symmetry. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[17]  D. Pink,et al.  Thickness and Elasticity of Gram-Negative Murein Sacculi Measured by Atomic Force Microscopy , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[18]  I. Kunin,et al.  Theory of anisotropic plates : strength, stability, and vibrations , 1970 .

[19]  L. Ford Estimate of the vibrational frequencies of spherical virus particles. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  Hirokazu Miyoshi,et al.  Encapsulated ultrasound microbubbles: therapeutic application in drug/gene delivery. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[21]  P. Jha,et al.  Acoustic phonon quantization and low-frequency Raman spectra of spherical viruses. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  Yang Liu,et al.  Therapeutic ultrasound: Its application in drug delivery , 2002, Medicinal research reviews.

[23]  Tribikram Kundu,et al.  Ultrasonic Nondestructive Evaluation : Engineering and Biological Material Characterization , 2003 .

[24]  Chien-Fu Hung,et al.  Inactivation of viruses by coherent excitations with a low power visible femtosecond laser , 2007, Virology Journal.

[25]  R. Apfel,et al.  Quadrupole resonance of drops driven by modulated acoustic radiation pressure—Experimental properties , 1980 .

[26]  Yusuf Chisti,et al.  Disruption of microbial cells for intracellular products , 1986 .

[27]  E. Ackerman An extension of the theory of resonances of biological cells: III. Relationship of breakdown curves and mechanical Q , 1957 .

[28]  J. Radok,et al.  The theory of thin shells , 1959 .

[29]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Vibrating microbubbles poking individual cells: drug transfer into cells via sonoporation. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[30]  Thomas J. Asaki,et al.  The effects of a soluble surfactant on quadrupole shape oscillations and dissolution of air bubbles in water , 1997 .

[31]  E Moses,et al.  Dynamic excitations in membranes induced by optical tweezers. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[32]  W. Nyborg,et al.  Cell disruption by ultrasound. , 1962, Science.

[33]  Richard R. Carhart,et al.  The Absorption of Sound in Suspensions and Emulsions. I. Water Fog in Air , 1953 .

[34]  F. Brochard,et al.  Frequency spectrum of the flicker phenomenon in erythrocytes , 1975 .

[35]  P. Zinin,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Single Cells by High-Frequency Time-Resolved Acoustic Microscopy , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[36]  Andrew E. Pelling,et al.  Local Nanomechanical Motion of the Cell Wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Science.

[37]  J. Allegra,et al.  Attenuation of Sound in Suspensions and Emulsions: Theory and Experiments , 1972 .

[38]  E. Benes,et al.  Development of a novel compact sonicator for cell disruption. , 2005, Journal of microbiological methods.

[39]  G. Brenn,et al.  Acoustically levitated drops: drop oscillation and break-up driven by ultrasound modulation , 2002 .

[40]  R. Apfel,et al.  Quadrupole oscillations of drops for studying interfacial properties , 1990 .

[41]  M. J. Willis,et al.  Bugbuster—survivability of living bacteria upon shock compression , 2003 .

[42]  Shaw-Wei D Tsen,et al.  Probing the low-frequency vibrational modes of viruses with Raman scattering--bacteriophage M13 in water. , 2007, Journal of biomedical optics.

[43]  P. Zinin Theoretical analysis of sound attenuation mechanisms in blood and in erythrocyte suspensions. , 1992, Ultrasonics.

[44]  K. Tachibana,et al.  In vitro transfer of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides into coronary endothelial cells by ultrasound. , 2002, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[45]  D.L. Miller Effects of a High-Amplitude 1-MHz Standing Ultrasonic Field on the Algae Hydrodictyon , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[46]  K. Tachibana,et al.  Eliminating adult T-cell leukaemia cells with ultrasound , 1997, The Lancet.

[47]  Anton P. J. Middelberg,et al.  On the mechanism of microbial cell disruption in high-pressure homogenisation , 1998 .

[48]  S. Barnett,et al.  Ultrasound. Nonthermal issues: cavitation--its nature, detection and measurement. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[49]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Micromanipulation of endothelial cells: ultrasound-microbubble-cell interaction. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[50]  A. R. Williams Ultrasound : biological effects and potential hazards , 1983 .

[51]  L. E. Scriven,et al.  The oscillations of a fluid droplet immersed in another fluid , 1968, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[52]  A. Balandin,et al.  Low‐frequency vibrational modes of viruses used for nanoelectronic self‐assemblies , 2004 .

[53]  Peter A. Lewin,et al.  Acoustically induced shear stresses in the vicinity of microbubbles in tissue , 1982 .

[54]  P. Marston Shape oscillation and static deformation of drops and bubbles driven by modulated radiation stresses—Theory , 1980 .

[55]  R. Apfel,et al.  Shape oscillations of drops in the presence of surfactants , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[56]  Klaus Ley,et al.  Binding and detachment dynamics of microbubbles targeted to P-selectin under controlled shear flow. , 2004, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[57]  P. Zinin,et al.  Mechanical resonances of bacteria cells. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[58]  N. Carpita,et al.  Tensile strength of cell walls of living cells. , 1985, Plant physiology.

[59]  O. Hamill,et al.  Molecular basis of mechanotransduction in living cells. , 2001, Physiological reviews.