Regulation of electrospun scaffold stiffness via coaxial core diameter.

Scaffold mechanics influence cellular behavior, including migration, phenotype and viability. Scaffold stiffness is commonly modulated through cross-linking, polymer density, or bioactive coatings on stiff substrates. These approaches provide useful information about cellular response to substrate stiffness; however, they are not ideal as the processing can change substrate morphology, density or chemistry. Coaxial electrospinning was investigated as a fabrication method to produce scaffolds with tunable stiffness and strength without changing architecture or surface chemistry. Core solution concentration, solvent and feed rate were utilized to control core diameter with higher solution concentration and feed rate positively correlating with increased fiber diameter and stiffness. Coaxial scaffolds electrospun with an 8 wt./vol.% polycaprolactone (PCL)-HFP solution at 1 ml h(-1) formed scaffolds with an average core diameter of 1.1±0.2 μm and stiffness of 0.027±3.3×10(-3) N mm(-1). In contrast, fibers which were 2.6±0.1 μm in core diameter yielded scaffolds with a stiffness of 0.065±4.7×10(-3) N mm(-1). Strength and stiffness positively correlated with core diameter with no significant difference in total fiber diameter and interfiber distance observed in as-spun scaffolds. These data indicate that coaxial core diameter can be utilized to tailor mechanical properties of three-dimensional scaffolds and would provide an ideal scaffold for assessing the effect of scaffold mechanics on cell behavior.

[1]  T. Desai,et al.  Three-dimensional culture with stiff microstructures increases proliferation and slows osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. , 2010, Small.

[2]  Antonio Rinaldi,et al.  Multiscale three-dimensional scaffolds for soft tissue engineering via multimodal electrospinning. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[3]  Weiliam Chen,et al.  Biodegradable fibrous scaffolds composed of gelatin coated poly(epsilon-caprolactone) prepared by coaxial electrospinning. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[4]  Younan Xia,et al.  Nanofibers of Conjugated Polymers Prepared by Electrospinning with a Two‐Capillary Spinneret , 2004 .

[5]  S. Bryant,et al.  Crosslinking density influences the morphology of chondrocytes photoencapsulated in PEG hydrogels during the application of compressive strain , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[6]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[7]  J. Merchuk,et al.  Hepatocyte behavior within three-dimensional porous alginate scaffolds. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[8]  Jackie Y Ying,et al.  The effect of matrix stiffness on mesenchymal stem cell differentiation in a 3D thixotropic gel. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[9]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[10]  S. Boyce,et al.  Fiber density of electrospun gelatin scaffolds regulates morphogenesis of dermal-epidermal skin substitutes. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[11]  M C Davies,et al.  Interactions of 3T3 fibroblasts and endothelial cells with defined pore features. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[12]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  S. Boyce,et al.  Engineered human skin fabricated using electrospun collagen-PCL blends: morphogenesis and mechanical properties. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[14]  Shulamit Levenberg,et al.  Effect of scaffold stiffness on myoblast differentiation. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[15]  M. Maaza,et al.  The influence of electrospinning parameters on the structural morphology and diameter of electrospun nanofibers , 2010 .

[16]  S. Ramakrishna,et al.  Double‐layered composite nanofibers and their mechanical performance , 2005 .

[17]  Sankha Bhowmick,et al.  Role of fiber diameter in adhesion and proliferation of NIH 3T3 fibroblast on electrospun polycaprolactone scaffolds. , 2007, Tissue engineering.

[18]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Production of Submicron Diameter Silk Fibers under Benign Processing Conditions by Two-Fluid Electrospinning , 2006 .

[19]  Yan Li,et al.  A facile technique to prepare biodegradable coaxial electrospun nanofibers for controlled release of bioactive agents. , 2005, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[20]  Darrell H. Reneker,et al.  Flat polymer ribbons and other shapes by electrospinning , 2001 .

[21]  Seeram Ramakrishna,et al.  Preparation of Core−Shell Structured PCL-r-Gelatin Bi-Component Nanofibers by Coaxial Electrospinning , 2004 .

[22]  Hsin-Yi Lin,et al.  Crosslinked chitosan: its physical properties and the effects of matrix stiffness on chondrocyte cell morphology and proliferation. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[23]  Frank P T Baaijens,et al.  Tailoring fiber diameter in electrospun poly(epsilon-caprolactone) scaffolds for optimal cellular infiltration in cardiovascular tissue engineering. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[24]  T. Ma,et al.  Effects of pore size in 3-D fibrous matrix on human trophoblast tissue development. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[25]  H. Bianco-Peled,et al.  Defining the role of matrix compliance and proteolysis in three-dimensional cell spreading and remodeling. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[26]  Andreas Greiner,et al.  Compound Core–Shell Polymer Nanofibers by Co‐Electrospinning , 2003 .

[27]  A. Engler,et al.  Photopolymerization in Microfluidic Gradient Generators: Microscale Control of Substrate Compliance to Manipulate Cell Response , 2004 .

[28]  Nic D. Leipzig,et al.  The effect of substrate stiffness on adult neural stem cell behavior. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[29]  Changmo Sung,et al.  Electrospinning of polycarbonate nanofibers with solvent mixtures THF and DMF , 2004 .

[30]  Giuseppe Gigli,et al.  Mechanical Gradient Cues for Guided Cell Motility and Control of Cell Behavior on Uniform Substrates , 2009 .

[31]  Clemens A van Blitterswijk,et al.  Synthetic scaffold morphology controls human dermal connective tissue formation. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[32]  H. Kim,et al.  Influence of a mixing solvent with tetrahydrofuran and N,N‐dimethylformamide on electrospun poly(vinyl chloride) nonwoven mats , 2002 .

[33]  J. Deitzel,et al.  The effect of processing variables on the morphology of electrospun nanofibers and textiles , 2001 .

[34]  A. Steckl,et al.  Versatile Core-Sheath Biofibers using Coaxial Electrospinning , 2008 .

[35]  D. Grainger,et al.  Modulating fibroblast adhesion, spreading, and proliferation using self-assembled monolayer films of alkylthiolates on gold. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[36]  R. Wells.  The role of matrix stiffness in regulating cell behavior , 2008, Hepatology.