Site response for urban Los Angeles using aftershocks of the Northridge earthquake

Ground-motion records from aftershocks of the 1994 Northridge earthquake are used to estimate site response in the urban Los Angeles area. Over 1300 shear-wave records from 61 sources and 90 sites are used in a linear inversion for source and site-response spectra. The methodology makes no assumptions about the shape of the source spectrum. To obtain a stable unique inverse, a Q model and geometrical spreading factor are assumed. In addition, the site response at a hard-rock site is constrained to be approximately 1.0 with a kappa of 0.02. The site-response spectra compare favorably with the results of previous and on-going investigations in Los Angeles. A couple of first-order effects are lower site response in the surrounding mountains, dominated by Mesozoic and Tertiary rocks, and higher values in the San Fernando and Los Angeles Basins, containing surficial Pleistocene and Holocene alluvial deposits. Results show good correlation of high site-response spectral values with localized areas of severe damage (Interstate 10 collapse, Sherman Oaks, Northridge, Interstate 5/14 collapse). However, widespread trends in site response across the sedimentary basins are not obvious. The data suggest that site responses are lower near the southern margin of the San Fernando Valley for sources to the north, due to north-dipping sedimentary structures. But the general pattern of site response is characterized by high variability on length scales less than a kilometer. Variations of a factor of 2 in site response are observed over the length scale of 200 m and for the same surficial geologic unit. For some of the alluvial basin sites, surface-wave generation is a significant contributor to elevated site response at lower frequencies, below 2 Hz. The total damage pattern for the Northridge earthquake is influenced by strong source directivity to the north and strong local site effects. The correlation of weak-motion site-response estimates with areas of significant damage demonstrates the value of these field measurements in future urban planning and in the reduction of seismic risk in urban areas.

[1]  Susan E. Hough,et al.  Earthquake site-response study in Giumri (formerly Leninakan), Armenia, using ambient noise observations , 1995 .

[2]  Roger D. Borcherdt,et al.  A comparative ground response study near Los Angeles using recordings of Nevada nuclear tests and the 1971 San Fernando earthquake , 1984 .

[3]  Edward H. Field,et al.  The theoretical response of sedimentary layers to ambient seismic noise , 1993 .

[4]  E. Cranswick.  The information content of high-frequency seismograms and the near-surface geologic structure of “hard rock” recording sites , 1988 .

[5]  David Carver,et al.  Urban seismology—Northridge aftershocks recorded by multi-scale arrays of portable digital seismographs , 1996 .

[6]  Kenneth W. Campbell,et al.  A note on the distribution of earthquake damage in Long Beach, 1933 , 1976, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[7]  Margaret Hellweg,et al.  Directional topographic site response at Tarzana observed in aftershocks of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake: Implications for mainshock motions , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[8]  R. P. Maley,et al.  Accelerograms recorded at USGS National Strong-Motion Network stations during the Ms=6.6 Northridge, California earthquake of January 17, 1994 , 1994 .

[9]  S. Hartzell.  Site response estimation from earthquake data , 1992, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[10]  John G. Anderson,et al.  A MODEL FOR THE SHAPE OF THE FOURIER AMPLITUDE SPECTRUM OF ACCELERATION AT HIGH FREQUENCIES , 1984 .

[11]  Keiiti Aki,et al.  Simultaneous study of the source, path, and site effects on strong ground motion during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake: A preliminary result on pervasive nonlinear site effects , 1991 .

[12]  P. Somerville,et al.  The influence of critical Moho Reflections on strong ground motions recorded in San Francisco and Oakland during the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake , 1990 .

[13]  Edward H. Field,et al.  A comparison and test of various site-response estimation techniques, including three that are not reference-site dependent , 1995 .

[14]  D. Wald,et al.  Response of High-Rise and Base-Isolated Buildings to a Hypothetical Mw 7.0 Blind Thrust Earthquake , 1995, Science.

[15]  A. Shakal,et al.  CSMP strong-motion records from the Northridge, California Earthquake of 17 January 1994 , 1994 .

[16]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  A note on distribution of uncorrected peak ground accelerations during the Northridge, California, earthquake of 17 January 1994 , 1994 .

[17]  Roger D. Borcherdt,et al.  Effects of local geological conditions in the San Francisco Bay region on ground motions and the intensities of the 1906 earthquake , 1976, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[18]  D. Perkins,et al.  Nuclear event time histories and computed site transfer functions for locations in the Los Angeles region , 1980 .

[19]  R. Borcherdt.  Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay , 1970 .

[20]  Allen H. Olson.  A Chebyshev condition for accelerating convergence of iterative tomographic methods-solving large least squares problems , 1987 .

[21]  J. Tinsley,et al.  Evaluation of the relation between near-surface geological units and ground response in the vicinity of Long Beach, California , 1979, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[22]  O. Nuttli,et al.  Yield estimates of nevada test site explosions obtained from seismic Lg waves , 1986 .

[23]  J. Boatwright,et al.  A comparison of coda and S-wave spectral ratios as estimates of site response in the southern San Francisco Bay area , 1994 .

[24]  Roger D. Borcherdt,et al.  A general earthquake-observation system (GEOS) , 1985 .