Choice of Magnetometers and Gradiometers after Signal Space Separation

Background: Modern Elekta Neuromag MEG devices include 102 sensor triplets containing one magnetometer and two planar gradiometers. The first processing step is often a signal space separation (SSS), which provides a powerful noise reduction. A question commonly raised by researchers and reviewers relates to which data should be employed in analyses: (1) magnetometers only, (2) gradiometers only, (3) magnetometers and gradiometers together. The MEG community is currently divided with regard to the proper answer. Methods: First, we provide theoretical evidence that both gradiometers and magnetometers result from the backprojection of the same SSS components. Then, we compare resting state and task-related sensor and source estimations from magnetometers and gradiometers in real MEG recordings before and after SSS. Results: SSS introduced a strong increase in the similarity between source time series derived from magnetometers and gradiometers (r2 = 0.3–0.8 before SSS and r2 > 0.80 after SSS). After SSS, resting state power spectrum and functional connectivity, as well as visual evoked responses, derived from both magnetometers and gradiometers were highly similar (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient > 0.8, r2 > 0.8). Conclusions: After SSS, magnetometer and gradiometer data are estimated from a single set of SSS components (usually ≤ 80). Equivalent results can be obtained with both sensor types in typical MEG experiments.

[1]  B. W. van Dijk,et al.  Feasibility of clinical Magnetoencephalography (MEG) functional mapping in the presence of dental artefacts , 2013, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  Kensuke Sekihara,et al.  MEG/EEG Source Reconstruction, Statistical Evaluation, and Visualization with NUTMEG , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[3]  S. Taulu,et al.  Presentation of electromagnetic multichannel data: The signal space separation method , 2005 .

[4]  S. Taulu,et al.  Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Fernando Maestú,et al.  Quantifying the Test-Retest Reliability of Magnetoencephalography Resting-State Functional Connectivity , 2016, Brain Connect..

[6]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Geometrically Accurate Topology-Correction of Cortical Surfaces Using Nonseparating Loops , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Sampling theory for neuromagnetic detector arrays , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  D. Cicchetti Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology. , 1994 .

[9]  Carl Friedrich Gauss,et al.  Allgemeine Theorie des Erdmagnetismus , 1877 .

[10]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[11]  Martin Luessi,et al.  MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data , 2014, NeuroImage.

[12]  関原 謙介,et al.  Adaptive Spatial Filters for Electromagnetic Brain Imaging , 2008 .

[13]  Stephen E. Robinson,et al.  SQUID sensor array configurations for magnetoencephalography applications , 2002 .

[14]  A. Nobre,et al.  Magnetoencephalography , 1990, The Lancet.

[15]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[16]  S. Taulu,et al.  Applications of the signal space separation method , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[17]  Martin Burghoff,et al.  Pseudo current density maps of electrophysiological heart, nerve or brain function and their physical basis , 2006, Biomagnetic research and technology.

[18]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  P. Peigneux,et al.  Inter- and Intra-Subject Variability of Neuromagnetic Resting State Networks , 2014, Brain Topography.

[20]  Laurent El Ghaoui,et al.  Inversion Error, Condition Number, and Approximate Inverses of Uncertain Matrices , 2001 .

[21]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  Fernando Maestú,et al.  Early detection and late cognitive control of emotional distraction by the prefrontal cortex , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[23]  Eric Larson,et al.  Mind the Noise Covariance When Localizing Brain Sources with M/EEG , 2015, 2015 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in NeuroImaging.

[24]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) study protocol: a cross-sectional, lifespan, multidisciplinary examination of healthy cognitive ageing , 2014, BMC Neurology.

[25]  A. Dale,et al.  Whole Brain Segmentation Automated Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structures in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[26]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  MEG and EEG data fusion: Simultaneous localisation of face-evoked responses , 2009, NeuroImage.

[27]  Martin Luessi,et al.  MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[28]  Alexandre Gramfort,et al.  Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals , 2015, NeuroImage.

[29]  Cam-CAN Group,et al.  The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) data repository: Structural and functional MRI, MEG, and cognitive data from a cross-sectional adult lifespan sample , 2017, NeuroImage.

[30]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Trial-Type Dependent Frames of Reference for Value Comparison , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[31]  Fernando Maestú,et al.  Test‐retest reliability of resting‐state magnetoencephalography power in sensor and source space , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Optimized beamforming for simultaneous MEG and intracranial local field potential recordings in deep brain stimulation patients , 2010, NeuroImage.

[33]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  Optimising experimental design for MEG beamformer imaging , 2008, NeuroImage.

[34]  M S Treder,et al.  Age-related delay in visual and auditory evoked responses is mediated by white- and grey-matter differences , 2017, Nature communications.

[35]  C. Stam,et al.  Direction of information flow in large-scale resting-state networks is frequency-dependent , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Arjan Hillebrand,et al.  Beamformer analysis of MEG data. , 2005, International review of neurobiology.

[37]  Robert Plonsey,et al.  Bioelectromagnetism: Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields , 1995 .