Avatars with Sex Appeal as Pedagogical Agents: Attractiveness, Trustworthiness, Expertise, and Gender Differences

The study focused on the use of pedagogical agents with sex appeal in a computer-assisted learning environment. The study adopted a 2 (male/female) × 3 (demure/seductive/overtly sexual) experimental design. The primary analysis consisted of 2 parts: (a) comparing the impact of effective learning on students' perceptions of demure, seductive, or overtly sexual pedagogical agents, and (b) exploring gender differences in the usage of pedagogical agents with sex appeal. The empirical study results revealed that the sex appeal of female pedagogical agents is more helpful in effective learning than those of male agents. The sexy appearances of pedagogical agents are perceived by students as attractive, untrustworthy, and unprofessional. A seductive appearance in pedagogical agents is the most beneficial for effective learning than demure or overtly sexual ones. Students' and pedagogical agents' gender affect the impact of pedagogical agents with sex appeal on effective learning.

[1]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[2]  James C. Lester,et al.  Animated Pedagogical Agents: Face-to-Face Interaction in Interactive Learning Environments , 2000 .

[3]  W. Joseph,et al.  The Credibility of Physically Attractive Communicators: A Review , 1982 .

[4]  G. Patzer.  A Comparison of Advertisement Effects: Sexy Female Communicator Vs Non-Sexy Female Communicator , 1980 .

[5]  Peter H. Bloch,et al.  You look “mahvelous”: The pursuit of beauty and the marketing concept , 1992 .

[6]  Hershey H. Friedman,et al.  Endorser effectiveness by product type. , 1979 .

[7]  Major Steadman,et al.  How sexy illustrations affect brand recall. , 1969 .

[8]  B. Sternthal,et al.  Highly Credible Sources: Persuasive Facilitators or Persuasive Liabilities? , 1977 .

[9]  Roobina Ohanian.  Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorsers' Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness , 1990 .

[10]  B. Judd,et al.  On the reduced effectiveness of some sexually suggestive ads , 1983 .

[11]  James C. Lester,et al.  The Case for Social Agency in Computer-Based Teaching: Do Students Learn More Deeply When They Interact With Animated Pedagogical Agents? , 2001 .

[12]  John J. Davies,et al.  Sex Appeals That Appeal: Negative Sexual Self-Schema as a Moderator of the Priming Effects of Sexual Ads on Accessibility , 2007 .

[13]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Effects of source expertness, physical attractiveness, and supporting arguments on persuasion: A case of brains over beauty. , 1980 .

[14]  Rinat B. Rosenberg-Kima,et al.  Interface agents as social models for female students: The effects of agent visual presence and appearance on female students' attitudes and beliefs , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  S. Putrevu,et al.  Consumer Responses Toward Sexual and Nonsexual Appeals: The Influence of Involvement, Need for Cognition (NFC), and Gender , 2008 .

[16]  Steven G. Horton,et al.  Male nudity in advertisements: A modified replication and extension of gender and product effects , 1996 .

[17]  E. Aronson,et al.  OPINION CHANGE AS A FUNCTION OF THE COMMUNICATOR'S ATTRACTIVENESS AND DESIRE TO INFLUENCE. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  R. Moreno.  Animated Pedagogical Agents in Educational Technology , 2004 .

[19]  A. A. Lumsdaine.  Communication and persuasion , 1954 .

[20]  Amy L. Baylor,et al.  Beyond Butlers: Intelligent Agents as Mentors , 2000 .

[21]  George Veletsianos.  Cognitive and Affective Benefits of an Animated Pedagogical Agent: Considering Contextual Relevance and Aesthetics , 2007 .

[22]  George Veletsianos,et al.  Contextually relevant pedagogical agents: Visual appearance, stereotypes, and first impressions and their impact on learning , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[24]  P. Homer,et al.  Physical Attractiveness of the Celebrity Endorser: A Social Adaptation Perspective , 1985 .

[25]  Yanghee Kim,et al.  Pedagogical Agents as Social Models to Influence Learner Attitudes , 2007 .

[26]  James C. Lester,et al.  The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents , 1997, CHI.

[27]  T. Henthorne,et al.  Ethical Judgments of Sexual Appeals in Print Advertising , 1994 .

[28]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[29]  Amy L. Baylor,et al.  The Impact of Pedagogical Agent Image on Affective Outcomes , 2004 .

[30]  Erin Shaw,et al.  Animated Pedagogical Agents: An Opportunity to be Grasped? , 2002 .

[31]  Yanghee Kim,et al.  Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions: The Role of Agent Competency and Type of Interaction , 2006 .

[32]  Michael R. Solomon,et al.  The Beauty Match-Up Hypothesis: Congruence between Types of Beauty and Product Images in Advertising , 1992 .

[33]  Sergii Mashtalir,et al.  ON-LINE VIDEO SEGMENTATION USING METHODS OF FAULT DETECTION IN MULTIDIMENSIONAL TIME SEQUENCES , 2012 .

[34]  Yanghee Kim,et al.  The impact of learner attributes and learner choice in an agent-based environment , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[35]  Magnus Haake,et al.  Design of animated pedagogical agents - A look at their look , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[36]  Yanghee Kim,et al.  Pedagogical agents as learning companions: the impact of agent emotion and gender , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[37]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  Open Learning Environments and the Impact of a Pedagogical Agent , 2006 .

[38]  Michael Belch,et al.  Demographic and Cognitive Factors Influencing Viewers Evaluations of QSexyQ Advertisements , 1979 .

[39]  D. Dahl,et al.  Gender-related reactions to gratuitous sex appeals in advertising , 2008 .

[40]  R. Atkinson.  Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. , 2002 .

[41]  S. Baker,et al.  Using Virtual Worlds in Education: Second Life® as an Educational Tool , 2009 .

[42]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Cognition and Instruction: Their Historic Meeting within Educational Psychology. , 1992 .

[43]  Do-Hyung Park,et al.  eWOM overload and its effect on consumer behavioral intention depending on consumer involvement , 2008, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[44]  Charles Miller,et al.  Conversing with pedagogical agents: A phenomenological exploration of interacting with digital entities , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[45]  Huay Lit Woo,et al.  Designing multimedia learning environments using animated pedagogical agents: factors and issues , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[46]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  The Impact of Physically Attractive Models on Advertising Evaluations , 1977 .

[47]  Chih-Chien Wang,et al.  Who is Everyone's Darling in Cyberspace? The Characteristics of Popular Online Daters , 2010 .

[48]  Jeeheon Ryu,et al.  The API (Agent Persona Instrument) for Assessing Pedagogical Agent Persona , 2003 .

[49]  Andrea J. S. Stanaland,et al.  Beefcake and Cheesecake: Insights for Advertisers , 1998 .

[50]  Michael A. Belch,et al.  The Effects of Sexual and Non-Sexual Advertising Appeals and Information Level on Cognitive Processing and Communication Effectiveness , 1990 .

[51]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  Animated Pedagogical Agents in Multimedia Educational Environments: Effects of Agent Properties, Picture Features, and Redundancy , 2002 .

[52]  W. Lewis Johnson,et al.  Pedagogical agents on the Web , 1999, AGENTS '99.

[53]  Nancy A. Jennings,et al.  Virtual or Virtually U: Educational Institutions in Second Life , 2007 .

[54]  I. Black,et al.  The effect of personality on response to sexual appeals , 2010 .

[55]  Amy L. Baylor,et al.  Permutations of Control: Cognitive Considerations for Agent-Based Learning Environments , 2001 .

[56]  Agneta Gulz,et al.  Benefits of Virtual Characters in Computer Based Learning Environments: Claims and Evidence , 2004, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..