Size-based quality-informed framework for quantitative optimization of pediatric CT

Abstract. The purpose of this study was to formulate a systematic, evidence-based method to relate quantitative diagnostic performance to radiation dose, enabling a multidimensional system to optimize computed tomography imaging across pediatric populations. Based on two prior foundational studies, radiation dose was assessed in terms of organ doses, effective dose (E), and risk index for 30 patients within nine color-coded pediatric age-size groups as a function of imaging parameters. The cases, supplemented with added noise and simulated lesions, were assessed in terms of nodule detection accuracy in an observer receiving operating characteristic study. The resulting continuous accuracy–dose relationships were used to optimize individual scan parameters. Before optimization, the nine protocols had a similar E of 2.2±0.2  mSv with accuracy decreasing from 0.89 for the youngest patients to 0.67 for the oldest. After optimization, a consistent target accuracy of 0.83 was established for all patient categories with E ranging from 1 to 10 mSv. Alternatively, isogradient operating points targeted a consistent ratio of accuracy–per-unit-dose across the patient categories. The developed model can be used to optimize individual scan parameters and provide for consistent diagnostic performance across the broad range of body sizes in children.

[1]  H. Brisse,et al.  Dose reduction with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for paediatric CT: phantom study and clinical experience on chest and abdomen CT , 2013, European Radiology.

[2]  W. Huda,et al.  Point/counterpoint. The use of effective dose for medical procedures is inappropriate. , 2010, Medical physics.

[3]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Dose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studies. , 2009, Radiology.

[4]  Donald P. Frush,et al.  MDCT in Children: Scan Techniques and Contrast Issues , 2008 .

[5]  David B. Larson,et al.  Optimizing CT radiation dose based on patient size and image quality: the size-specific dose estimate method , 2014, Pediatric Radiology.

[6]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: part I. development and validation of a Monte Carlo program. , 2010, Medical physics.

[7]  M. Absalon,et al.  Pulmonary nodules discovered during the initial evaluation of pediatric patients with bone and soft‐tissue sarcoma , 2008, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[8]  John M Boone,et al.  Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach. , 2003, Radiology.

[9]  M. Goodsitt,et al.  Model-based iterative reconstruction: effect on patient radiation dose and image quality in pediatric body CT. , 2013, Radiology.

[10]  D. Origgi,et al.  Radiation dose from multidetector CT studies in children: results from the first Italian nationwide survey , 2015, Pediatric Radiology.

[11]  F. Gudinchet,et al.  CT radiation dose in children: a survey to establish age-based diagnostic reference levels in Switzerland , 2008, European Radiology.

[12]  Joel G Fletcher,et al.  Automatic selection of tube potential for radiation dose reduction in CT: a general strategy. , 2009, Medical physics.

[13]  Louise Poissant Part I , 1996, Leonardo.

[14]  Jenia Vassileva,et al.  IAEA survey of paediatric computed tomography practice in 40 countries in Asia, Europe, Latin America and Africa: procedures and protocols , 2012, European Radiology.

[15]  D J Brenner,et al.  Effective dose: a flawed concept that could and should be replaced. , 2008, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Lung nodule detection in pediatric chest CT: quantitative relationship between image quality and radiologist performance. , 2011, Medical physics.

[17]  P C Shrimpton,et al.  National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[18]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Radiation Dose Reduction in Abdominal Computed Tomography During the Late Hepatic Arterial Phase Using a Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm: How Low Can We Go? , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[19]  Katsuyuki Taguchi,et al.  Achieving routine submillisievert CT scanning: report from the summit on management of radiation dose in CT. , 2012, Radiology.

[20]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Effects of protocol and obesity on dose conversion factors in adult body CT. , 2012, Medical physics.

[21]  A. Bankier,et al.  Through the Looking Glass revisited: the need for more meaning and less drama in the reporting of dose and dose reduction in CT. , 2012, Radiology.

[22]  James H Thrall,et al.  Radiation dose reduction with hybrid iterative reconstruction for pediatric CT. , 2012, Radiology.

[23]  A. Craft,et al.  Childhood cancer–mainly curable so where next? , 2000, Acta paediatrica.

[24]  Jack Valentin,et al.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[25]  Vesna Gershan,et al.  IAEA survey of pediatric CT practice in 40 countries in Asia, Europe, Latin America, and Africa: Part 1, frequency and appropriateness. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  Colin J. Martin,et al.  The application of effective dose to medical exposures. , 2007, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[27]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Radiation risk index for pediatric CT: a patient-derived metric , 2017, Pediatric Radiology.

[28]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Comparison of patient size-based methods for estimating quantum noise in CT images of the lung. , 2009, Medical physics.

[29]  Chin-Shang Li,et al.  Distinguishing benign from malignant pulmonary nodules with helical chest CT in children with malignant solid tumors. , 2006, Radiology.

[30]  G. Hagen,et al.  Computed Tomography: Fundamentals, System Technology, Image Quality, Applications , 2012 .

[31]  D. Frush,et al.  Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[32]  Nancy A Obuchowski,et al.  Contrast-to-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full- and low-dose MDCT: SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  Zhao-qi Zhang,et al.  Improved image quality in dual-energy abdominal CT: comparison of iterative reconstruction in image space and filtered back projection reconstruction. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[34]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Relating noise to image quality indicators in CT examinations with tube current modulation. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[35]  P. Babyn,et al.  CT characteristics of lung nodules present at diagnosis of extrapulmonary malignancy in children. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[36]  Willi A Kalender,et al.  Effects of adaptive section collimation on patient radiation dose in multisection spiral CT. , 2009, Radiology.

[37]  K. Strauss Developing patient-specific dose protocols for a CT scanner and exam using diagnostic reference levels , 2014, Pediatric Radiology.

[38]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk for pediatric chest CT. , 2011, Radiology.

[39]  M. Kalra,et al.  Radiation Dose Reduction With Chest Computed Tomography Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique: Initial Experience , 2010, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[40]  Dianna D Cody,et al.  Strategies for formulating appropriate MDCT techniques when imaging the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in pediatric patients. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[41]  Keith J Strauss,et al.  Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children's hospital. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[42]  A S Brody,et al.  Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large Children's Hospital. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[43]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[44]  B. Aubert,et al.  Niveaux d'exposition en tomodensitométrie multicoupes pédiatrique : résultats de l'enquête dosimétrique SFIPP/IRSN 2007-2008 , 2009 .

[45]  Marilyn J Goske,et al.  System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. part I. Optimization model. , 2013, Radiology.

[46]  Noriyuki Tomiyama,et al.  Multidetector CT of the lung: image quality with garnet-based detectors. , 2010, Radiology.

[47]  H. Brisse,et al.  [CT exposure from pediatric MDCT: results from the 2007-2008 SFIPP/ISRN survey]. , 2009, Journal de radiologie.

[48]  Donald P Frush,et al.  Improved pediatric multidetector body CT using a size-based color-coded format. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.