The Price of Connectivity for Vertex Cover

The vertex cover number of a graph is the minimum number of vertices that are needed to cover all edges. When those vertices are further required to induce a connected subgraph, the corresponding number is called the connected vertex cover number, and is always greater or equal to the vertex cover number. Connected vertex covers are found in many applications, and the relationship between those two graph invariants is therefore a natural question to investigate. For that purpose, we introduce the \em Price of Connectivity, defined as the ratio between the two vertex cover numbers. We prove that the price of connectivity is at most 2 for arbitrary graphs. We further consider graph classes in which the price of connectivity of every induced subgraph is bounded by some real number t. We obtain forbidden induced subgraph characterizations for every real value t ≤q 3/2. We also investigate critical graphs for this property, namely, graphs whose price of connectivity is strictly greater than that of any proper induced subgraph. Those are the only graphs that can appear in a forbidden subgraph characterization for the hereditary property of having a price of connectivity at most t. In particular, we completely characterize the critical graphs that are also chordal. Finally, we also consider the question of computing the price of connectivity of a given graph. Unsurprisingly, the decision version of this question is NP-hard. In fact, we show that it is even complete for the class Θ₂^P = P^NP[\log], the class of decision problems that can be solved in polynomial time, provided we can make O(\log n) queries to an NP-oracle. This paves the way for a thorough investigation of the complexity of problems involving ratios of graph invariants.

[1]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  Algorithmic Aspects of Vertex Elimination on Graphs , 1976, SIAM J. Comput..

[2]  Jörg Vogel,et al.  Theta2p-Completeness: A Classical Approach for New Results , 2000, FSTTCS.

[3]  Jason Fulman A note on the characterization of domination perfect graphs , 1993, J. Graph Theory.

[4]  Eglantine Camby,et al.  A Note on Connected Dominating Set in Graphs Without Long Paths And Cycles , 2013, ArXiv.

[5]  David Manlove,et al.  Vertex and Edge Covers with Clustering Properties: Complexity and Algorithms , 2009, ACiD.

[6]  Igor E. Zverovich Perfect connected-dominant graphs , 2003, Discuss. Math. Graph Theory.

[7]  Stefan Richter,et al.  Enumerate and Expand: Improved Algorithms for Connected Vertex Cover and Tree Cover , 2006, Theory of Computing Systems.

[8]  Vadim E. Zverovich,et al.  A semi-induced subgraph characterization of upper domination perfect graphs , 1999, J. Graph Theory.

[9]  Jean Cardinal,et al.  Connected Vertex Covers in Dense Graphs , 2008, APPROX-RANDOM.

[10]  Oliver Schaudt On graphs for which the connected domination number is at most the total domination number , 2012, Discret. Appl. Math..

[11]  Jérôme Monnot,et al.  Complexity and approximation results for the connected vertex cover problem in graphs and hypergraphs , 2007, J. Discrete Algorithms.

[12]  Rolf Niedermeier,et al.  Parameterized Complexity of Generalized Vertex Cover Problems , 2005, WADS.

[13]  J. Cardinal,et al.  Approximation algorithms for covering problems in dense graphs , 2009 .

[14]  Stefan Richter,et al.  Enumerate and Expand: New Runtime Bounds for Vertex Cover Variants , 2006, COCOON.

[15]  A. Brandstädt,et al.  Graph Classes: A Survey , 1987 .