Hybrid PET/MR Imaging: An Algorithm to Reduce Metal Artifacts from Dental Implants in Dixon-Based Attenuation Map Generation Using a Multiacquisition Variable-Resonance Image Combination Sequence

It was the aim of this study to implement an algorithm modifying Dixon-based MR imaging datasets for attenuation correction in hybrid PET/MR imaging with a multiacquisition variable resonance image combination (MAVRIC) sequence to reduce metal artifacts. Methods: After ethics approval, in 8 oncologic patients with dental implants data were acquired in a trimodality setup with PET/CT and MR imaging. The protocol included a whole-body 3-dimensional dual gradient-echo sequence (Dixon) used for MR imaging–based PET attenuation correction and a high-resolution MAVRIC sequence, applied in the oral area compromised by dental implants. An algorithm was implemented correcting the Dixon-based μ maps using the MAVRIC in areas of Dixon signal voids. The artifact size of the corrected μ maps was compared with the uncorrected MR imaging μ maps. Results: The algorithm was robust in all patients. There was a significant reduction in mean artifact size of 70.5% between uncorrected and corrected μ maps from 697 ± 589 mm2 to 202 ± 119 mm2 (P = 0.016). Conclusion: The proposed algorithm could improve MR imaging–based attenuation correction in critical areas, when standard attenuation correction is hampered by metal artifacts, using a MAVRIC.

[1]  Ciprian Catana,et al.  PET/MRI for Neurologic Applications , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Gaspar Delso,et al.  Anatomic Evaluation of 3-Dimensional Ultrashort-Echo-Time Bone Maps for PET/MR Attenuation Correction , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Detection Rate, Location, and Size of Pulmonary Nodules in Trimodality PET/CT-MR: Comparison of Low-Dose CT and Dixon-Based MR Imaging , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[4]  V. Schulz,et al.  Challenges and current methods for attenuation correction in PET/MR , 2013, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[5]  Sune H. Keller,et al.  Image artifacts from MR-based attenuation correction in clinical, whole-body PET/MRI , 2013, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[6]  J. Schenck The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. , 1996, Medical physics.

[7]  M. Nittka,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty MRI featuring slice-encoding for metal artifact correction: reduction of artifacts for STIR and proton density-weighted sequences. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Whole-body hybrid PET/MRI: ready for clinical use? , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  D. Cicchetti Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology. , 1994 .

[10]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  MR-Based Attenuation Correction Methods for Improved PET Quantification in Lesions Within Bone and Susceptibility Artifact Regions , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Ernst J. Rummeny,et al.  Value of a Dixon-based MR/PET attenuation correction sequence for the localization and evaluation of PET-positive lesions , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[12]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Tissue Classification as a Potential Approach for Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT Data , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  H. Zaidi Is MR-guided attenuation correction a viable option for dual-modality PET/MR imaging? , 2007, Radiology.

[14]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[15]  G. Delso,et al.  Performance Measurements of the Siemens mMR Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR Scanner , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Scott L Delp,et al.  New MR imaging methods for metallic implants in the knee: Artifact correction and clinical impact , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  Matthew F Koff,et al.  MRI after arthroplasty: comparison of MAVRIC and conventional fast spin-echo techniques. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  C. Kuhl,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for Hybrid PET/MRI Systems: A 4-Class Tissue Segmentation Technique Using a Combined Ultrashort-Echo-Time/Dixon MRI Sequence , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  I. Burger,et al.  PET/MR imaging of bone lesions – implications for PET quantification from imperfect attenuation correction , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[20]  G Delso,et al.  MR-driven metal artifact reduction in PET/CT , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Jiang Du,et al.  MR imaging near metal with undersampled 3D radial UTE‐MAVRIC sequences , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  A. Buck,et al.  PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[23]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Atlas-guided non-uniform attenuation correction in cerebral 3D PET imaging , 2005, NeuroImage.

[24]  M. Nittka,et al.  Reduction of metal artifacts in patients with total hip arthroplasty with slice-encoding metal artifact correction and view-angle tilting MR imaging. , 2012, Radiology.