An overview of the crash dynamics failure behavior of metal and composite aircraft structures

An overview of failure behavior results is presented from some of the crash dynamics research conducted with concepts of aircraft elements and substructure not necessarily designed or optimized for energy absorption or crash loading considerations. Experimental and analytical data are presented that indicate some general trends in the failure behavior of a class of composite structures that includes fuselage panels, individual fuselage sections, fuselage frames, skeleton subfloors with stringers and floor beams without skin covering, and subfloors with skin added to the frame stringer structure. Although the behavior is complex, a strong similarity in the static/dynamic failure behavior among these structures is illustrated through photographs of the experimental results and through analytical data of generic composite structural models.

[1]  E. Alfaro-Bou,et al.  Crash tests of three identical low-wing single-engine airplane , 1983 .

[2]  E. Alfaro-Bou,et al.  Impact dynamics research facility for full-scale aircraft crash testing , 1976 .

[3]  Robert J. Hayduk,et al.  Impact data from a transport aircraft during a controlled impact demonstration , 1986 .

[4]  H. D. Carden.  Full-scale crash-test evaluation of two load-limiting subfloors for general aviation airframes , 1984 .

[5]  H. D. Carden.  Correlation and assessment of structural airplane crash data with flight parameters at impact , 1982 .

[6]  E. L. Fasanella,et al.  Vertical drop test of a transport fuselage section located aft of the wing , 1986 .

[7]  Lisa E. Jones,et al.  Evaluation of Energy Absorption of New Concepts of Aircraft Composite Subfloor Intersections. , 1989 .

[8]  Edwin L. Fasanella,et al.  Structural analysis of the controlled impact demonstration of a jet transport airplane , 1987 .

[9]  Richard L. Boitnott,et al.  Crashworthy design of helicopter composite airframe structures , 1989 .

[10]  E Alfaro-Bou,et al.  Light Airplane Crash Tests at Impact Velocities of 13 and 27 m/sec , 1977 .

[11]  E. Alfaro-Bou,et al.  Light airplane crash tests at three roll angles , 1979 .

[12]  Robert J. Hayduk,et al.  FULL-SCALE TRANSPORT CONTROLLED IMPACT DEMONSTRATION PRELIMINARY NASA STRUCTURAL DATA , 1985 .

[13]  R. J. Hayduk,et al.  Vertical drop test of a transport fuselage section located forward of the wing , 1983 .

[14]  R. J. Hayduk.  Full-Scale Transport controlled Impact Demonstration , 1986 .

[15]  E. Alfaro-Bou,et al.  Light airplane crash tests at three pitch angles , 1979 .

[16]  Robert J. Hayduk,et al.  Aircraft subfloor response to crash loadings , 1981 .

[17]  G. Pei,et al.  Transport composite fuselage technology: Impact dynamics and acoustic transmission , 1986 .

[18]  Huey D. Carden.  Impulse Analysis of Airplane Crash Data with Consideration Given to Human Tolerance , 1983 .

[19]  Edwin L. Fasanella,et al.  IMPACT EVALUATION OF COMPOSITE FLOOR SECTIONS. , 1989 .

[20]  E. Alfaro-Bou,et al.  Light airplane crash tests at three flight-path angles , 1978 .

[21]  R. J. Hayduk.  COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PA-31-350 CHIEFTAIN (N44LV) ACCIDENT AND NASA CRASH TEST DATA , 1979 .

[22]  Edwin L. Fasanella,et al.  Impact response of composite fuselage frames , 1987 .

[23]  R. J. Hayduk,et al.  Crash tests of four identical high-wing single-engine airplanes , 1980 .

[24]  M. S. Williams,et al.  Crash tests of four low-wing twin-engine airplanes with truss-reinforced fuselage structure , 1982 .

[25]  A. Pifko,et al.  DYCAST, A FINITE ELEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE CRASH ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES , 1987 .