Incremental value of preprocedural coronary computed tomographic angiography to classical coronary angiography for prediction of PCI complexity in left main stenosis

Introduction: The aim of our study was to assess the incremental value of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) added to classical coronary angiography, for complex characterization of coronary lesions and prediction of procedural complexity in patients with significant left main (LM) stenoses. Material and Methods: Thirty-six patients with LM disease were enrolled in the study, and each subject underwent CCTA followed by coronary angiography and percutaneous revascularization. Results: Logistic regression analysis indicated a good correlation between the angiographic-calculated and the CCTA-derived Syntax scores for the whole group (r = 0.87, p 11.5 vs 25.2 +/-11.3, p = 0.01 for CCTA). In the same time, Ca scoring was significantly higher and plaque volumes were significantly larger in cases requiring complex revascularization procedures (299.5 +/-359.6 vs 917.3 +/-495.4, p = 0.04 for calcium score, 79.7 +/-28.5 vs 108.7 +/-25.3 mm3, p = 0.002 for plaque volumes). Multivariate analysis identified the following CCTA parameters as significant predictors of increased risk for complex intervention in LM lesions: plaque volume (OR 8.00, p = 0.008), Ca scoring (OR 6.37, p = 0.02) and CCTA Syntax score (OR 6.87, p = 0.01). Conclusions: CCTA derived parameters provide incremental information to classical coronary angiography for preoperative assessment of lesion severity in complex left main stenosis. CCTA derived Syntax score significantly correlates with the classical Coronary Angiography Syntax score and identifies the subgroup of patients who will be more exposed to procedural complications during the revascularization interventions.

[1]  D. Morrison Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention: a new paradigm for a new century. , 2005, Minerva cardioangiologica.

[2]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Coronary computed tomography angiography indicates complexity of percutaneous coronary interventions. , 2012, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[3]  Zhonghua Sun,et al.  Multislice CT angiography assessment of left coronary artery: correlation between bifurcation angle and dimensions and development of coronary artery disease. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[4]  M. Gyöngyösi,et al.  Multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography for quantitative assessment of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes. , 2013, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[5]  O. Alfieri,et al.  Drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease. The DELTA registry: a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[6]  P. Serruys,et al.  The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. , 2005, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[7]  P. Serruys,et al.  The SYNTAX score and SYNTAX-based clinical risk scores. , 2011, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  S. Fichtlscherer,et al.  Risk stratification following complex PCI: clinical versus anatomical risk stratification including "post PCI residual SYNTAX-score" as quantification of incomplete revascularization. , 2013, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[9]  J. Forrester,et al.  Predictive accuracy of SYNTAX score for predicting long-term outcomes of unprotected left main coronary artery revascularization. , 2011, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  Fang Chen,et al.  Syntax score predicts clinical outcome in patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2011, Chinese medical journal.

[11]  D. Capodanno,et al.  Usefulness of SYNTAX score to select patients with left main coronary artery disease to be treated with coronary artery bypass graft. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[12]  D. Faxon,et al.  Revascularization of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease , 2011, Cardiology in review.

[13]  D. Capodanno,et al.  Global risk classification and clinical SYNTAX (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXUS and cardiac surgery) score in patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical left main revascularization. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[14]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial , 2013, The Lancet.

[15]  M. Mack,et al.  Outcomes in Patients With De Novo Left Main Disease Treated With Either Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Treatment in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) Trial , 2010, Circulation.

[16]  P. Serruys,et al.  SYNTAX score and Clinical SYNTAX score as predictors of very long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: a substudy of SIRolimus-eluting stent compared with pacliTAXel-eluting stent for coronary revascularization (SIRTAX) trial. , 2011, European heart journal.