Effects of structural anisotropy of cancellous bone on speed of ultrasonic fast waves in the bovine femur

Ultrasonic waves in cancellous bone change dramatically depending on its structural complexity. One good example is the separation of an ultrasonic longitudinal wave into fast and slow waves during propagation. In this study, we examined fast wave propagation in cancellous bone obtained from the head of the bovine femur, taking the bone structure into consideration. We investigated the wave propagation perpendicular to the bone axis and found the two-wave phenomenon. By rotating the cylindrical cancellous bone specimen, changes in the fast wave speed due to the rotation angle then were observed. In addition to the ultrasonic evaluation, the structural anisotropy of each specimen was measured by X-ray micro-computed tomography (CT). From the CT images, we obtained the mean intercept length (MIL), degree of anisotropy (DA), and angle of insonification relative to the trabecular orientation. The ultrasonic and CT results showed that the fast wave speed was dependent on the structural anisotropy, especially on the trabecular orientation and length. The fast wave speeds always were higher for propagation parallel to the trabecular orientation. In addition, there was a strong correlation between the DA and the ratio between maximum and minimum speeds (Vmax/Vmin) (R2 = 0.63).

[1]  W. Lauriks,et al.  Ultrasonic wave propagation in human cancellous bone: application of Biot theory. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  M. Jergas,et al.  Accurate assessment of precision errors: How to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[3]  Laurent Sedel,et al.  In Vitro Acoustic Waves Propagation in Human and Bovine Cancellous Bone , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  M. Biot.  Theory of Propagation of Elastic Waves in a Fluid-Saturated Porous Solid. II. Higher Frequency Range , 1956 .

[5]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Three quantitative ultrasound parameters reflect bone structure , 1994, Calcified Tissue International.

[6]  C. Langton,et al.  The measurement of broadband ultrasonic attenuation in cancellous bone. , 1984, Engineering in medicine.

[7]  J. Bauer,et al.  Imaging of Trabecular Bone Structure , 2002, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[8]  W. J. Johnson,et al.  Elastic constants of composites formed from PMMA bone cement and anisotropic bovine tibial cancellous bone. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  A. Laib,et al.  The dependence of ultrasonic backscatter on trabecular thickness in human calcaneus: theoretical and experimental results , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  R. B. Ashman,et al.  Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  T. Otani,et al.  Quantitative Estimation of Bone Density and Bone Quality Using Acoustic Parameters of Cancellous Bone for Fast and Slow Waves , 2005 .

[12]  G. Berger,et al.  Broadband ultrasonic attenuation imaging: A new imaging technique of the os calcis , 1994, Calcified Tissue International.

[13]  A. Hosokawa,et al.  Ultrasonic wave propagation in bovine cancellous bone. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Sex differences in age-related loss of vertebral trabecular bone mass and structure--biomechanical consequences. , 1989, Bone.

[15]  Harry K. Genant,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound: Assessment of Osteoporosis and Bone Status , 1999 .

[16]  Maurice A. Biot,et al.  Generalized Theory of Acoustic Propagation in Porous Dissipative Media , 1962 .

[17]  J. Rho,et al.  Low-megahertz ultrasonic properties of bovine cancellous bone. , 2000, Bone.

[18]  P. Nicholson,et al.  The dependence of ultrasonic properties on orientation in human vertebral bone. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Takao Yamamuro,et al.  Electron microscopy of calcification during high-density suspension culture of chondrocytes , 1993, Calcified Tissue International.

[20]  A. Hosokawa,et al.  Acoustic anisotropy in bovine cancellous bone. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  E. Bossy,et al.  Three-dimensional simulation of ultrasound propagation through trabecular bone structures measured by synchrotron microtomography , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  C. Langton,et al.  Biot theory: a review of its application to ultrasound propagation through cancellous bone. , 1999, Bone.

[23]  P R White,et al.  Ultrasonic propagation in cancellous bone: a new stratified model. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[24]  Influences of Trabecular Structure on Ultrasonic Wave Propagation in Bovine Cancellous Bone , 1997 .

[25]  A. Parfitt,et al.  Trabecular bone architecture in the pathogenesis and prevention of fracture. , 1987, The American journal of medicine.

[26]  R. Mann,et al.  Characterization of microstructural anisotropy in orthotropic materials using a second rank tensor , 1984 .

[27]  Martin Greenspan,et al.  Tables of the Speed of Sound in Water , 1959 .

[28]  Timothy G Leighton,et al.  Investigation of an anisotropic tortuosity in a biot model of ultrasonic propagation in cancellous bone. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  L. Gibson.  The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  J. Thoen,et al.  Propagation of ultrasonic pulses through trabecular bone , 1994 .

[31]  J. Williams.  Ultrasonic wave propagation in cancellous and cortical bone: prediction of some experimental results by Biot's theory. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  W. J. Whitehouse,et al.  Scanning electron microscope studies of trabecular bone in the proximal end of the human femur. , 1974, Journal of anatomy.

[33]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound of the Calcaneus Reflects the Mechanical Properties of Calcaneal Trabecular Bone , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[34]  C. M. Langton,et al.  Prediction of Human Femoral Bone Strength Using Ultrasound Velocity and BMD: An In Vitro Study , 1997, Osteoporosis International.

[35]  J K Weaver,et al.  Cancellous bone: its strength and changes with aging and an evaluation of some methods for measuring its mineral content. , 1966, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[36]  H K Genant,et al.  A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites: first results of precision and fracture discrimination. , 2000, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[37]  S. Palmer,et al.  The interaction of ultrasound with cancellous bone. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[38]  Steven A. Goldstein,et al.  Measurement and significance of three-dimensional architecture to the mechanical integrity of trabecular bone , 2005, Calcified Tissue International.

[39]  M. Biot.  Theory of Propagation of Elastic Waves in a Fluid‐Saturated Porous Solid. I. Low‐Frequency Range , 1956 .

[40]  F. Patat,et al.  Bidirectional axial transmission can improve accuracy and precision of ultrasonic velocity measurement in cortical bone: a validation on test materials , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[41]  B. Stampa,et al.  Assessment of the Geometry of Human Finger Phalanges Using Quantitative Ultrasound In Vivo , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[42]  W. J. Whitehouse.  The quantitative morphology of anisotropic trabecular bone , 1974, Journal of microscopy.

[43]  R. Siffert,et al.  Ultrasonic bone assessment: "the time has come". , 2007, Bone.