Longitudinal Driving Behavior in Case of Emergency Situations: An Empirically Underpinned Theoretical Framework☆

Adverse conditions have been shown to have a substantial impact on traffic flow operations. It is however not yet clear to what extent emergency situations actually lead to adaptation effects in empirical longitudinal driving behavior, what the causes of these adaptation effects are and how these can best be modeled. In this paper we show using an elaborate driv- ing simulator experiment that emergency situations lead to significant adaptation effects in longitudinal driving behavior. Furthermore we introduce a new theoretical framework. In this framework adaptation effects in longitudinal driving be- havior are assumed to consist of compensation effects and performance effects. In order to empirically underpin this framework we show in this paper that compensation effects are reflected in parameter value changes in the Intelligent Driver Model, while performance effects are reflected in a reduction in model performance. Furthermore we show that compensation effects following an emergency situation are reflected in a change in the position of perceptual thresholds in a psycho-spacing model while performance effects are reflected in a reduced sensitivity of acceleration towards lead vehicle related stimuli at the action points. The paper concludes with a discussion as well as recommendations for future research.

[1]  John A. Michon,et al.  A critical view of driver behavior models: What do we know , 1985 .

[2]  Thomas J. Cova,et al.  A network flow model for lane-based evacuation routing , 2003 .

[3]  Marc L. Levitan,et al.  National Review of Hurricane Evacuation Plans and Policies , 2001 .

[4]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Prediction of goal directed behaviour: Attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioural control , 1986 .

[5]  W Leutzbach,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATIONS OF TRAFFIC SIMULATION MODELS AT THE KARLSRUHE INSTITUT FUR VERKEHRWESEN , 1986 .

[6]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Wiedemann Revisited , 2011 .

[7]  M. M. Minderhoud,et al.  Supported driving: impacts on motorway traffic flow , 1999 .

[8]  Dick de Waard,et al.  Behavioural impacts of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems - an overview. , 2001 .

[9]  Nagui M. Rouphail,et al.  Simulation and Analysis of Freeway Lane Reversal for Coastal Hurricane Evacuation , 2007 .

[10]  D. M. Hoedemaeker Driving with intelligent vehicles: driving behaviour with Adaptive Cruise Control and the acceptance by individual drivers , 1999 .

[11]  Fang Yuan,et al.  Improving Evacuation Planning with Sensible Measure of Effectiveness Choices , 2009 .

[12]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Perception of highway traffic signs and motivation , 1974 .

[13]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Enhanced intelligent driver model to access the impact of driving strategies on traffic capacity , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[14]  Gerard J. Blaauw,et al.  Driving Experience and Task Demands in Simulator and Instrumented Car: A Validation Study , 1982 .

[15]  Gerald J.S. Wilde,et al.  The Theory of Risk Homeostasis: Implications for Safety and Health , 1982 .

[16]  R. Fuller Towards a general theory of driver behaviour. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  M. Washburn,et al.  Bodily Changes in Pain, Hunger, Fear, and Rage. , 1917 .

[18]  Helbing,et al.  Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[19]  Charles Taylor,et al.  The Explanation of Behaviour , 1964 .

[20]  Steve G. Gabany,et al.  Why drivers speed: The speeding perception inventory , 1997 .

[21]  Nina Schaap,et al.  Drivers' behavioural reactions to unexpected events , 2008 .

[22]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Motorway driver behaviour: studies on car following , 2002 .

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[24]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Generic Calibration Framework for Joint Estimation of Car-Following Models by Using Microscopic Data , 2010 .

[25]  Todd Litman,et al.  Lessons From Katrina and Rita: What Major Disasters Can Teach Transportation Planners , 2006 .

[26]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  A review on travel behaviour modelling in dynamic traffic simulation models for evacuations , 2012 .

[27]  Robert Herman,et al.  ANALYTICAL METHODS IN TRANSPORTATION : MATHEMATICAL CAR-FOLLOWING THEORY OF TRAFFIC FLOW , 1963 .

[28]  Hoe C Lee,et al.  The validity of driving simulator to measure on-road driving performance of older drivers , 2002 .

[29]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Car-following: a historical review , 1999 .

[30]  E. Boer Car following from the driver’s perspective , 1999 .

[31]  P. G. Gipps,et al.  A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation , 1981 .

[32]  K A Brookhuis,et al.  The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[33]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Validating a driving simulator using surrogate safety measures. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[34]  Huizhao Tu,et al.  Evacuation plan of the city of almere: Simulating the impact of driving behavior on evacuation clearance time , 2010 .

[35]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  From Existing Accident-Free Car-Following Models to Colliding Vehicles , 2008 .

[36]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Microscopic Traffic Flow Properties in Emergency Situations , 2013 .

[37]  Francesco Bella,et al.  Driving simulator for speed research on two-lane rural roads. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.