Risk assessment of the ignitability and explosivity of aluminum nanopowders

Previously, an extensive study has been carried out in order to assess the ignition sensitivity and explosivity of aluminum nanopowders. It showed notably that, as the particle size decreases, minimum ignition temperature and minimum ignition energy decrease, indicating higher potential inflammation. However, the explosion severity decreases for diameters lower than 1 μm. As a consequence, this study leads to the conclusions that the ignition sensitivity and explosion severity of aluminum nanopowders may be affected by various phenomena, as pre-ignition, agglomeration/aggregation degree and the intrinsic alumina content. The presence of wall-quenching effects and the predominance of radiation compared to conduction in the flame propagation process have to be discussed to ensure the validity of the 20 L sphere and of the results extrapolation. Based on the peculiar behaviours that had been previously highlighted, a specific risk analysis has been developed in order to assess the fire and explosion risks of such materials. It has been applied to an industrial plant of aluminum nanopowders production. The hazard identification and the consequence modelling steps, especially the quantification of the likelihood and consequences, have been designed specifically. The application of this method has led to the definition of the most adequate safety barriers.

[2]  Hong-Chun Wu,et al.  Research of minimum ignition energy for nano Titanium powder and nano Iron powder , 2009 .

[3]  Martin Glor,et al.  ELECTROSTATIC HAZARDS IN POWDER HANDLING , 1988 .

[4]  Hong-Chun Wu,et al.  Explosion Characteristics of Aluminum Nanopowders , 2010 .

[5]  Vigor Yang,et al.  Analysis of Nano-Aluminum Particle Dust Cloud Combustion in Different Oxidizer Environments , 2005 .

[6]  W. Bartknecht,et al.  Dust Explosions: Course, Prevention, Protection , 1989 .

[7]  O. Dufaud,et al.  Ignition and explosion of nanopowders: something new under the dust , 2011 .

[8]  M. Silvestrini,et al.  Correlations for flame speed and explosion overpressure of dust clouds inside industrial enclosures , 2008 .

[9]  Trevor Kletz Process Plants: A Handbook for Inherently Safer Design , 1998 .

[10]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Application of inherent safety principles to dust explosion prevention and mitigation , 2009 .

[11]  Laurent Perrin,et al.  Experimental investigation and modelling of aluminum dusts explosions in the 20 L sphere , 2010 .

[12]  Rolf K. Eckhoff,et al.  Dust Explosions in the Process Industries , 1991 .

[13]  Frank P. Lees,et al.  Loss Prevention In The Process Industries , 1980 .

[14]  A. Turcotte,et al.  Characterization of Aluminum Nanopowder Compositions , 2002 .

[15]  E. Randeberg Electric spark ignition of sensitive dust clouds in the sub 1 mJ range , 2006 .

[16]  Richard Siwek,et al.  Ignition behavior of dusts: Meaning and interpretation , 1995 .

[17]  D. Geldart Types of gas fluidization , 1973 .

[18]  C. Proust A few fundamental aspects about ignition and flame propagation in dust clouds , 2006 .

[19]  O. Dufaud,et al.  Ignition and explosion risks of nanopowders. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[20]  John Nagy,et al.  Explosibility of Metal Powders , 1964 .

[21]  Snorre Sklet,et al.  Safety barriers: Definition, classification, and performance , 2006 .

[22]  Andrew Hale,et al.  The development of an audit technique to assess the quality of safety barrier management. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.