Inflammatory tinea capitis due to Microsporum canis transmitted from asymptomatic domestic cats

Dear Editor, Tinea capitis is a cutaneous fungal infection of the scalp that is common among children. It is mainly caused by Trichophyton tonsurans and Microsporum (M.) canis.1 M. canis is a dermatophyte fungus of which cats and dogs are natural hosts, which is easily transmitted to humans. A fouryearold girl with no immunodeficiency was referred to our hospital with a fourmonth history of erythematous lesions on her scalp. The lesions had gradually enlarged despite the use of antibiotics, oral, and topical corticosteroids. A physical examination revealed multiple erythematous lesions with hair loss, crusts, and pustules (Figure 1A). Potassium hydroxide examinations of the hair root and scales showed no fungal elements. A histological examination showed granulomatous inflammation (Figure 1B), histiocytes and a few multinucleated giant cells were present (Figure 1C). Periodic acidSchiff and Grocott’s staining showed no fungal elements. Culturing of scalp scales obtained by tape stripping on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar at 25°C showed a cream color with a dense cottony surface (Figure 1D). The scraped specimen from the culture showed hyphae and spindleshaped macroconidia (Figure 1E). The sequence of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region in the ribosomal RNA gene of the strain amplified with the ITS1 and ITS4 primer set2 was 100% homologous (698/698 bp) with that of the type strain M. canis CBS 217.69 (accession number MH859294.1) (data not shown). After 12 weeks of oral treatment with terbinafine (5 mg/kg/day), the hair regrew completely, although crusted erythema was observed (Figure 1F). Fungal cultures from domestic animals performed to estimate the route of infection resulted in the growth of colonies similar to patient isolates from three cats. The molecular biology of the strains was consistent with that isolated from the patient (data not shown). M. canis is classified into 20 genotypes by a combination of microsatellite markers. We attempted to classify this isolate using three primer sets, MS2, MS4, and MS7.3 Capillary electrophoresis did not result in a classification consistent with a previous report3; however, it showed that the peak positions of all isolates were consistent (Figure 1G), suggesting that the M. canis was transmitted from the domestic cats. We did not have a direct evidence that the case was kerion celsi caused by M. canis. However, M. canis grew on the tape stripping culture before treatment but not after treatment, suggesting that the M. canis on the scalp surface was probably pathogenic. Tinea capitis with inflammation mimicking scarring alopecia was reported and its clinical manifestation was similar to that of our case.4 We hypothesize that our patient had strong immunity to M. canis after the topical inoculation of the dermatophytes. There appear to be two routes of M. canis among cats via a pet shop for domesticated animals and via the outdoors in strays.5 Our patient’s Persian cats were purchased from a pet shop. However, the family had many cats and dogs, and they might have had contact with stray animals. A microsatellite marker analysis can be a useful method for tracing the route of transmission.