A flux-pinning mechanism for segment assembly and alignment

Currently, the most compelling astrophysics questions include how planets and the first stars formed and whether there are protostellar disks that contain large organic molecules. Although answering these questions requires space telescopes with apertures of at least 10 meters, such large primaries are challenging to construct by scaling up previous designs; the limited capacity of a launch vehicle bounds the maximum diameter of a monolithic primary, and beyond a certain size, deployable telescopes cannot fit in current launch vehicle fairings. One potential solution is connecting the primary mirror segments edgewise using flux-pinning mechanisms, which are analogous to non-contacting damped springs. In the baseline design, a flux-pinning mechanism consists of a magnet and a superconductor separated by a predetermined gap, with the damping adjusted by placing aluminum near the interface. Since flux pinning is possible only when the superconductor is cooled below a critical temperature, flux-pinning mechanisms are uniquely suited for cryogenic space telescopes. By placing these mechanisms along the edges of the mirror segments, a primary can be built up over time. Since flux pinning requires no mechanical deployments, the assembly process could be robotic or use some other noncontacting scheme. Advantages of this approach include scalability and passive stability.

[1]  Olivier Absil,et al.  Terrestrial Planet Finder Interferometer (TPF-1) Whitepaper for the AAAC Exoplanet Task Force , 2007 .

[2]  Mason A. Peck,et al.  Flux-Pinned Interfaces for the Assembly, Manipulation, and Reconfiguration of Modular Space Systems , 2009 .

[3]  H. Rix,et al.  The James Webb Space Telescope , 2006, astro-ph/0606175.

[4]  Mark Clampin,et al.  Advanced Technology Large-Aperture Space Telescope (ATLAST): A Technology Roadmap for the Next Decade , 2009 .

[5]  Mason A. Peck,et al.  Microgravity Demonstrations of Flux Pinning for Station-Keeping and Reconfiguration of CubeSat-Sized Spacecraft , 2010 .

[6]  A. Labeyrie Standing wave and pellicle: a possible approach to very large space telescopes. , 1979 .

[7]  P. Bely The Design and Construction of Large Optical Telescopes , 2010 .

[8]  Harvey S. Moseley,et al.  An Engineering Concept and Enabling Technologies for a Large Single Aperture Far-Infrared Observatory (SAFIR) , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[9]  David A. Quinn,et al.  Tethered Formation Configurations: Meeting the Scientific Objectives of Large Aperture and Interferometric Science , 2001 .

[10]  Dominic J. Benford,et al.  Charting the Winds that Change the Universe, II: The Single Aperture Far Infrared Observatory (SAFIR) , 2004 .

[11]  A. Labeyrie,et al.  Optics of laser trapped mirrors for large telescopes and hypertelescopes in space , 2005, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[12]  Dominic J. Benford,et al.  Mission Concept for the Single Aperture Far-Infrared (SAFIR) Observatory , 2004 .

[13]  T. Johansen,et al.  Theory for lateral stability and magnetic stiffness in a high-Tc superconductor-magnet levitation system , 1993 .

[14]  Jonathan C. McDowell,et al.  James Webb Space Telescope , 2004 .

[15]  David T. Leisawitz,et al.  Far-Infrared/Submillimeter Astronomical Interferometry with Spaceborne Tether Formations , 2006 .

[16]  Raymond J. Sedwick,et al.  Electromagnetic Formation Flight for Multisatellite Arrays , 2004 .

[17]  David T. Leisawitz,et al.  NASA's Far-IR/Submillimeter Roadmap Missions SAFIR and SPECS , 2004 .

[18]  A. Kordyuk,et al.  Magnetic levitation for hard superconductors , 1998 .