Adaptive non-parametric efficiency frontier analysis: a neural-network-based model

There have been two schools of efficiency analysis for private and public organizations. One is the data envelopment analysis (DEA) method which is based on a mathematical programming approach, and the other is the estimation of stochastic frontier functions (SFF) which is based on the econometric regression theory. Each of these two methodologies has its strength as well as major limitations. This paper proposes a non-parametric efficiency analysis method based on the adaptive neural network technique. The proposed computational method is able to find a stochastic frontier based on a set of input-output observational data. Like SFF, the proposed method considers two types of deviations involved in input-output data: managerial (external) and observational (internal) deviations. Like DEA, the proposed method does not require explicit assumptions about the function structure of the stochastic frontier. However, unlike any SFF and stochastic DEA methods, the proposed method does not require any parametric assumption of distribution functions. Using the neural networks, this method provides an adaptive way of obtaining empirical estimates of stochastic frontiers. An example using real data is presented for illustrative purposes. Simulation experiments demonstrate that the neural-network-based method would be effective as adaptive non-parametric efficiency analysis.

[1]  Lennart Hjalmarsson,et al.  Deterministic parametric and nonparametric estimation of efficiency in service production: A comparison , 1990 .

[2]  George Cybenko,et al.  Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function , 1992, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[3]  D. Aigner,et al.  P. Schmidt, 1977,?Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models,? , 1977 .

[4]  R. Banker Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: a statistical foundation , 1993 .

[5]  Jati K. Sengupta,et al.  Nonlinear measures of technical efficiency , 1989, Comput. Oper. Res..

[6]  Shouhong Wang,et al.  Nonparametric econometric modelling: A neural network approach , 1996 .

[7]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[8]  P. Bauer Recent developments in the econometric estimation of frontiers , 1990 .

[9]  P. Schmidt Frontier production functions , 1985 .

[10]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment scenario analysis for setting targets to electricity generating plants , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  N. Petersen,et al.  Chance constrained efficiency evaluation , 1995 .

[12]  W. Greene Maximum likelihood estimation of econometric frontier functions , 1980 .

[13]  Donna L. Retzlaff-Roberts Relating discriminant analysis and data envelopment analysis to one another , 1996, Comput. Oper. Res..

[14]  W. Cooper,et al.  Chance Constrained Programming Formulations for Stochastic Characterizations of Efficiency and Dominance in DEA , 1998 .

[15]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[16]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Chapter 13 Satisficing DEA models under chance constraints , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[17]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Cost Function Using Data Envelopment Analysis: an Application to the AT&T Divestiture , 1991 .

[18]  Byeong-Ho Gong,et al.  Finite sample evidence on the performance of stochastic frontiers and data envelopment analysis using panel data , 1992 .

[19]  W. Greene A Gamma-distributed stochastic frontier model , 1990 .

[20]  A. Charnes,et al.  Polyhedral Cone-Ratio DEA Models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks , 1990 .

[21]  Subhash C. Ray,et al.  Resource-Use Efficiency in Public Schools: A Study of Connecticut Data , 1991 .

[22]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  DEA/AR-efficiency of U.S. independent oil/gas producers over time , 1992, Comput. Oper. Res..

[23]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through , 1981 .

[24]  James J. Heckman,et al.  A Test for Subadditivity of the Cost Function with an Application to the Bell System , 1986 .

[25]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Measurement of Productivity Improvements: An Empirical Analysis , 1987 .

[26]  Jati K. Sengupta Robust decisions in economic models , 1991, Comput. Oper. Res..

[27]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Recent developments in dea : the mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis , 1990 .