SMR siting for the electricity system management

Abstract Small modular reactor (SMR) is an emerging clean technology that is expected to help decarbonize power systems and mitigate climate change in the future. However, previous SMR siting methods were unable to take the multi-complexities of the power system into account. To deal with such a shortage, a factorial optimization-based SMR siting (FOSS) model is developed in this study. The main advantage of the developed FOSS model is its capability of comprehensively examining the SMR siting issue within a general electricity-system framework under multi-complexities. The optimized SMR siting schemes and power-systems transition plans can be then provided. The developed approach was applied to the power systems in Saskatchewan, Canada. The results indicate that replacing conventional coal-fired plants with SMRs can be a beneficial alternative to promote GHG mitigation and meet the growing power demand. The SMR deployment would enable a transition to a low-carbon power system in Saskatchewan with at least 65.6% emissions reduction by 2045 from 2018 level. Factorial and scenario-based analysis can provide policy makers with reference points to formulate specific decarbonization policies of power systems. The FOSS model can be adapted for electricity systems in different countries and this research provides a promising way to promote a transition towards long-term sustainability in global energy systems.

[1]  H. Askari-Nasab,et al.  Mixed Integer Linear Programming for Oil Sands Production Planning and Tailings Management , 2019 .

[2]  Hongjing Wu,et al.  Quantification of Uncertainty Propagation Effects during Statistical Downscaling of Precipitation and Temperature to Hydrological Modeling , 2018 .

[3]  Lin Wang,et al.  Risk-based electric power system planning for climate change mitigation through multi-stage joint-probabilistic left-hand-side chance-constrained fractional programming: A Canadian case study , 2018 .

[4]  D. Hay,et al.  Call for action. , 1971, Nursing mirror and midwives journal.

[5]  Jasmina L. Vujic,et al.  Small modular reactors: Simpler, safer, cheaper? , 2012 .

[6]  M. Ramana,et al.  Back to the Future , 2015 .

[7]  Karl Stéphenne,et al.  Start-up of World's First Commercial Post-combustion Coal Fired CCS Project: Contribution of Shell Cansolv to SaskPower Boundary Dam ICCS Project , 2014 .

[8]  Alexander Q. Gilbert,et al.  Can Distributed Nuclear Power Address Energy Resilience and Energy Poverty? , 2020, Joule.

[9]  Gordon H. Huang,et al.  A Fuzzy Gradient Chance-Constrained Evacuation Model for Managing Risks of Nuclear Power Plants under Multiple Uncertainties , 2017 .

[10]  A. F. Zhai,et al.  Improvement of Instantaneous Point Source Model for Simulating Radionuclide Diffusion in Oceans under Nuclear Power Plant Accidents , 2020 .

[11]  C. K. Chanda,et al.  Optimal location, type and size selection technique of Distributed Generation based on economic index , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Energy Efficient Technologies for Sustainability.

[12]  Giorgio Locatelli,et al.  Small modular reactors: A comprehensive overview of their economics and strategic aspects , 2014 .

[13]  N. Doustmohammadi,et al.  Design of Closed Loop Supply Chain of Wood Plastic Composite (WPC) Industry , 2019, Journal of Environmental Informatics.

[14]  Guohe Huang,et al.  The development of inexact dual-objective programming for regional energy systems planning in Guang-Fo-Zhao region, China , 2020 .

[15]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Programming with linear fractional functionals , 1962 .

[16]  G. Hanrahan,et al.  Experimental Design and Response Surface Modeling: A Method Development Application for the Determination of Reduced Inorganic Species in Environmental Samples , 2007 .

[17]  Gordon H. Huang,et al.  An interval-parameter multi-stage stochastic programming model for water resources management under uncertainty , 2006 .

[18]  G. Peters,et al.  Emissions are still rising: ramp up the cuts , 2018, Nature.

[19]  Solomon F. Brown,et al.  Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward , 2018 .

[20]  Irfan Al-Anbagi,et al.  Fuzzy AHP-based Siting of Small Modular Reactors for Power Generation in the Smart Grid , 2018, 2018 IEEE Electrical Power and Energy Conference (EPEC).

[21]  G. Locatelli,et al.  Economics and finance of Small Modular Reactors: A systematic review and research agenda , 2020, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[22]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Carbon dioxide emissions continue to grow amidst slowly emerging climate policies , 2020 .

[23]  J. Piwowar,et al.  Geographical Considerations in Site Selection for Small Modular Reactors in Saskatchewan , 2019, Geosciences.

[24]  Guohe Huang,et al.  A Stochastic Optimization Model for Carbon-Emission Reduction Investment and Sustainable Energy Planning under Cost-Risk Control , 2020, Journal of Environmental Informatics.

[25]  G. Huang,et al.  Management of Uncertain Information for Environmental Systems Using a Multistage Fuzzy-Stochastic Programming Model with Soft Constraints , 2011 .

[26]  R. Stuart Haszeldine,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage: How Green Can Black Be? , 2009, Science.

[27]  Mark Cooper,et al.  Small modular reactors and the future of nuclear power in the United States , 2014 .

[28]  S. Zionts,et al.  Programming with linear fractional functionals , 1968 .

[29]  M. H. Subki,et al.  Design and technology development for small modular reactors – Safety expectations, prospects and impediments of their deployment , 2015 .

[30]  Iain Staffell,et al.  Quantifying the value of CCS for the future electricity system , 2016 .

[31]  Ye Xu,et al.  A Two-Stage Fuzzy Chance-Constrained Model for Solid Waste Allocation Planning , 2014 .