The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence

This paper reviews the empirical evidence of the effect of credibility of the message source on persuasion over a span of 5 decades, primarily to come up with recommendations for practitioners as to when to use a high- or a low-credibility source and secondarily to identify areas for future research. The main effect studies of source credibility on persuasion seem to indicate the superiority of a high-credibility source over a low-credibility one. Interaction effect studies, however, show source credibility to be a liability under certain conditions. The variables found to interact with source credibility are categorized into 5 categories: source, message, channel, receiver, and destination variables. The most heavily researched variables have been the message and receiver variables. Implications for marketers/advertisers and suggestions for future research are discussed.

[1]  A. A. Lumsdaine,et al.  Experiments on mass communication, Vol. 3. , 1949 .

[2]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness , 1951 .

[3]  C I HOVLAND,et al.  An experimental comparison of conclusion-drawing by the communicator and by the audience. , 1952, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[4]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  Reinstatement of the communicator in delayed measurement of opinion change. , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[5]  P. Tannenbaum,et al.  The Effects of Bylines on Attitude Change , 1961 .

[6]  A. Bergin,et al.  The effect of dissonant persuasive communications upon changes in a self-referring attitude. , 1962, Journal of personality.

[7]  Leon Festinger,et al.  The Effectiveness of "Overheard" Persuasive Communications , 1962 .

[8]  A. H. Hill CREDIBILTY, DISCREPANCY AND LATITUDE OF COMMUNICATION AS DIMENSIONS OF DISSONANCE INFLUENCING ATTITUDE CHANGE1 , 1963 .

[9]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  Communicator credibility and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion change. , 1963 .

[10]  T H CHOO,et al.  COMMUNICATOR CREDIBILITY AND COMMUNICATION DISCREPANCY AS DETERMINANTS OF OPINION CHANGE. , 1964, The Journal of social psychology.

[11]  H. B. Green SOCIALIZATION VALUES IN THE NEGRO AND EAST INDIAN SUBCULTURES OF TRINIDAD. , 1964, The Journal of social psychology.

[12]  S. Kiesler,et al.  ROLE OF FOREWARNING IN PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATIONS. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[13]  W. Mcguire,et al.  PERSISTENCE OF INDUCED OPINION CHANGE AND RETENTION OF THE INDUCING MESSAGE CONTENTS. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[14]  G. Miller,et al.  Source credibility and response to fear‐arousing communications , 1965 .

[15]  E. Aronson,et al.  OPINION CHANGE AS A FUNCTION OF THE COMMUNICATOR'S ATTRACTIVENESS AND DESIRE TO INFLUENCE. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  T. R. Husek PERSUASIVE IMPACTS OF EARLY, LATE OR NO MENTION OF A NEGATIVE SOURCE. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  F. A. Powell Source credibility and behavioral compliance as determinants of attitude change. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  G. Miller,et al.  Some recent research on fear‐arousing message appeals , 1966 .

[19]  J. Mills,et al.  Opinion change as a function of the communicator's desire to influence and liking for the audience , 1966 .

[20]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  On increasing the persuasiveness of a low prestige communicator , 1966 .

[21]  G. Miller,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF LOW CREDIBLE SOURCES ON MESSAGE ACCEPTANCE: FOUR EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES IN PERSUASION , 1966 .

[22]  S. Bochner,et al.  Communicator discrepancy, source credibility, and opinion change. , 1966 .

[23]  J. Mccroskey Scales for the measurement of ethos , 1966 .

[24]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  Communication discrepancy and intent to persuade as determinants of counterargument production , 1967 .

[25]  H. H. Johnson,et al.  Some effects of discrepancy level on relationships between authoritarianism and conformity. , 1967, The Journal of social psychology.

[26]  B. Koslin,et al.  Source characteristics and communication discrepancy as determinants of attitude change and conformity , 1967 .

[27]  G. Miller,et al.  Social approval and disapproval cues in anxiety‐arousing communications , 1967 .

[28]  M. Brewer,et al.  Attitude Change as a Function of Discrepancy and Source of Influence , 1968 .

[29]  S. Strong Counseling: An interpersonal influence process. , 1968 .

[30]  J. Whitehead Factors of source credibility , 1968 .

[31]  H. H. Johnson,et al.  The effects of source on responses to negative information about one's self. , 1968, The Journal of social psychology.

[32]  Robert D. Meade,et al.  Retention of Opinion Change as a Function of Differential Source Credibility: A Cross-Cultural Study , 1968 .

[33]  H. H. Johnson,et al.  Effects of source credibility on the relationship between authoritarianism and attitude change. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  I. Warren The effect of credibility in sources of testimony on audience attitudes toward speaker and message , 1969 .

[35]  E. J. Phares,et al.  Attitude change as a function of internal-external control and communicator status. , 1969, Journal of personality.

[36]  J. Mccroskey A summary of experimental research on the effects of evidence in persuasive communication , 1969 .

[37]  H. H. Johnson,et al.  Effects of ego-involvement conditions on attitude change to high and low credibility communicators. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  H. H. Johnson,et al.  Relationship between authoritarianism and attitude change as a function of source credibility and type of communication. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  James B. Lemert,et al.  DIMENSIONS FOR EVALUATING THE ACCEPTABILITY OF MESSAGE SOURCES , 1969 .

[40]  John R. Baseheart,et al.  Source trustworthiness, opinionated statements, and response to persuasive communication , 1969 .

[41]  William D. Crano,et al.  Effects of Sex, Response Order, and Expertise in Conformity: A Dispositional Approach* , 1970 .

[42]  C. Hendrick,et al.  Effects of extraneous fear arousal and birth order on attitude change , 1970 .

[43]  Ramon J. Rhine,et al.  Ego-involvement, discrepancy, source credibility, and attitude change. , 1970 .

[44]  G. I. Schulman,et al.  SALIENCE PATTERNS, SOURCE CREDIBILITY, AND THE SLEEPER EFFECT , 1970 .

[45]  D. R. Shaffer,et al.  Effects of arousal and credibility on learning and persuasion , 1970 .

[46]  Opinionated statements and attitude intensity as predictors of attitude change and source credibility , 1970 .

[47]  G. Miller,et al.  Source evaluation, syllogistic content, and judgments of logical validity by high- and low-dogmatic persons. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  C. D. Ward,et al.  Persuasive Effects of Early and Late Mention of Credible and Noncredible Sources. Three Cross-Cultural Experiments. , 1970 .

[49]  James C. McCroskey,et al.  The effects of evidence as an inhibitor of counter‐persuasion , 1970 .

[50]  William A. Watts,et al.  Forewarning effects in persuasion: Field and classroom experiments. , 1971 .

[51]  J. Harvey,et al.  Opinion Change as a Function of When Information About the Communicator Is Received and Whether He Is Attractive or Expert. , 1972 .

[52]  D. Hays,et al.  Effect of Dogmatism and Authority of the Source of Communication upon Persuasion , 1972, Psychological reports.

[53]  Ronald L. Applbaum,et al.  Dimensions of source credibility: A test for reproducibility , 1973 .

[54]  H. Kassinove,et al.  Effect of Perceived Expertise, Strength of Advice, and Environmental Setting on Parental Compliance , 1973 .

[55]  J. A. Ross Influence of Expert and Peer upon Negro Mothers of Low Socioeconomic Status , 1973 .

[56]  K. Weick,et al.  The Effect of Composer Credibility on Orchestra Performance , 1973 .

[57]  E. McGinnies Initial attitude, source credibility, and involvement as factors in persuasion , 1973 .

[58]  C. Hendrick,et al.  Communicator credibility and persuasian , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[59]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  The Effect of Salesman Similarity and Expertise on Consumer Purchasing Behavior , 1974 .

[60]  C. D. Ward,et al.  Persuasibility as a function of source credibility and locus of control: five cross cultural experiments. , 1974, Journal of personality.

[61]  H. Kassinove,et al.  Effects of Required Effort, Perceived Expertise, and Sex on Teacher Compliance , 1974 .

[62]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Is it time to lay the sleeper effect to rest , 1974 .

[63]  Joann Horai,et al.  The Effects of Expertise and Physical Attractiveness Upon Opinion Agreement and Liking , 1974 .

[64]  R. Glen Hass,et al.  Temporal delay, type of forewarning, and resistance to influence , 1975 .

[65]  Douglas G. Bock,et al.  The impact of source credibility, attitude valence, and task sensitization on trait errors in speech evaluation , 1975 .

[66]  Stephen Worchel,et al.  Is the Medium the Message? A Study of the Effects of Media, Communicator, and Message Characteristics on Attitude Change1 , 1975 .

[67]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Effects of source status and message favorability on acceptance of personality feedback. , 1976, The Journal of applied psychology.

[68]  Jo Liska,et al.  A critique of factor analytic approaches to the study of credibility , 1976 .

[69]  D. Zillmann,et al.  The Persuasive Effectiveness of the Peer Appeal and a Communicator's First-Hand Experience , 1976 .

[70]  Effects of Price and Salesman Expertise on Customer Purchasing Behavior , 1976 .

[71]  T. Wasserman,et al.  Effects of Type of Recommendation, Attire, and Perceived Expertise on Parental Compliance , 1976 .

[72]  Hershey H. Friedman,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF ENDORSEMENTS ON PRODUCT EVALUATION , 1977 .

[73]  B. Sternthal,et al.  Highly Credible Sources: Persuasive Facilitators or Persuasive Liabilities? , 1977 .

[74]  L. Phillips,et al.  The persuasive effect of source credibility: a situational analysis. , 1978, Public opinion quarterly.

[75]  Alice M. Tybout Relative Effectiveness of Three Behavioral Influence Strategies as Supplements to Persuasion in a Marketing Context , 1978 .

[76]  Kouhei Suzuki,et al.  ACCEPTANCE AND REJECTION OF A SUGGESTION , 1978 .

[77]  Stephen Worchel,et al.  Effects of Media, Communicator,and Message Position onAttitude Change , 1978 .

[78]  Patient compliance with advice as a function of communicator expertise. , 1978, The Journal of social psychology.

[79]  Clark Leavitt,et al.  The Persuasive Effect of Source Credibility: Tests of Cognitive Response , 1978 .

[80]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of Forwarning of Persuasive Intent and Involvement on Cognitive Responses and Persuasion , 1979 .

[81]  Crédibilité de l'émetteur, crédibilité du message, et dissuasion: expérimentation en milieu suburbain , 1980 .

[82]  C. D. Ward,et al.  Better Liked than Right , 1980 .

[83]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Effects of source expertness, physical attractiveness, and supporting arguments on persuasion: A case of brains over beauty. , 1980 .

[84]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Personal involvement as a determinant of argument based persuasion , 1981 .

[85]  Daniel M. Wegner,et al.  Incrimination through innuendo: Can media questions become public answers? , 1981 .

[86]  T. Cook,et al.  Cognitive tuning set, source credibility, and the temporal persistence of attitude change , 1982 .

[87]  Robert R. Harmon,et al.  The Persuasive Effects of Source Credibility in Buy and Lease Situations , 1982 .

[88]  M. Heesacker,et al.  Field dependence and attitude change: Source credibility can alter persuasion by affecting message-relevant thinking , 1983 .

[89]  Rebecca Elmore-Yalch,et al.  The Effect of Numbers on the Route to Persuasion , 1984 .

[90]  B. Sternthal,et al.  Detecting and Explaining the Sleeper Effect , 1984 .

[91]  R. Feldman The influence of communicator characteristics on the nutrition attitudes and behavior of high school students. , 1984, The Journal of school health.

[92]  James M. Olson,et al.  Source credibility, attitudes, and the recall of past behaviours , 1984 .

[93]  S. Lirtzman,et al.  Credibility of Sources of Communication on Products' Safety Hazards , 1986, Psychological reports.

[94]  D. L. Moore,et al.  Time Compression, Response Opportunity, and Persuasion , 1986 .

[95]  B. Bannister,et al.  Performance outcome feedback and attributional feedback: interactive effects on recipient responses , 1986 .

[96]  Robert D. St. Louis,et al.  Explaining Consumers' Reactions to Price Changes in Service Industries , 1987 .

[97]  D. R. Shaffer,et al.  Susceptibility to persuasive appeals as a function of source credibility and prior experience with the attitude object. , 1987 .

[98]  M. Laroche,et al.  Compensatory Effects of Cognitive Characteristics of the Source, the Message, and the Receiver Upon Attitude Change , 1988 .

[99]  J. M. Olson,et al.  Uncertainty orientation and persuasion: Individual differences in the effects of personal relevance on social judgments. , 1988 .

[100]  Kenneth G. DeBono,et al.  Source expertise, source attractiveness, and the processing of persuasive information: A functional approach. , 1988 .

[101]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  Communicator Attributes and Persuasion , 1988, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[102]  Anne Maass,et al.  The role of social categorization and perceived source credibility in minority influence , 1988 .

[103]  Cal D. Stoltenberg,et al.  Career and Study Skills Information: Who Says What Can Alter Message Processing , 1988 .

[104]  Jean Perrien,et al.  Limits of Credibility: The Case of Political Persuasion , 1990 .

[105]  Jeffery J. Mondak Perceived legitimacy of Supreme Court decisions: Three functions of source credibility , 1990 .

[106]  John E. Hunter,et al.  An Empirical Test of an Axiomatic Model of the Relationship Between Language Intensity and Persuasion , 1990 .

[107]  Terence A. Shimp,et al.  Effects of involvement, argument strength, and source characteristics on central and peripheral processing of advertising , 1990 .

[108]  Changing attitudes regarding the effectiveness of cognitive restructuring for treating depression , 1990 .

[109]  J. Hartwick,et al.  The Effects of Advertiser Reputation and Extremity of Advertising Claim on Advertising Effectiveness , 1990 .

[110]  Lynn R. Kahle,et al.  Source Expertise, Time of Source Identification, and Involvement in Persuasion: An Elaborative Processing Perspective , 1990 .

[111]  Roobina Ohanian The impact of celebrity spokespersons' perceived image on consumers' intention to purchase. , 1991 .

[112]  Alan D. Bright,et al.  A model for assessing the effects of communication on recreationists. , 1991 .

[113]  S. Ratneshwar,et al.  The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Persuasion , 1997 .

[114]  Kenneth G. DeBono,et al.  Repressors, sensitizers, source expertise, and persuasion , 1992 .

[115]  David Mazursky,et al.  Learning from the ad or relying on related attitudes: The moderating role of involvement , 1992 .

[116]  Kenneth G. DeBono,et al.  Source Expertise and Persuasion: The Moderating Role of Recipient Dogmatism , 1993 .

[117]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[118]  Paul E. Levy,et al.  The Effects of Source Credibility and Performance Rating Discrepancy on Reactions to Multiple Raters1 , 1995 .

[119]  L. Johnston,et al.  A Dual Processing Approach to Stereotype Change , 1995 .

[120]  M. Slater,et al.  How Message Evaluation and Source Attributes May Influence Credibility Assessment and Belief Change , 1996 .

[121]  Sudhir K. Chawla,et al.  “Fitness” Marketing: Celebrity or Non-Celebrity Endorsement? , 1997 .

[122]  Min-Sun Kim,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Effects of Source Credibility on Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions , 1998 .

[123]  Jason Hart,et al.  Are the Tabloids Always Wrong or Is That Just What We Think? Need for Cognition and Perceptions of Articles in Print Media , 1999 .

[124]  Margaret Higgins,et al.  Meta-Information, and Time: Factors in Human Decision Making , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[125]  Yong Zhang,et al.  Moderating Effects of Need for Cognition on Responses to Positively versus Negatively Framed Advertising Messages , 1999 .

[126]  Barbara A. Lafferty,et al.  The Impact of Corporate Credibility and Celebrity Credibility on Consumer Reaction to Advertisements and Brands , 2000 .

[127]  Chanthika Pornpitakpan,et al.  The Effect of Cultural Differences, Source Expertise, and Argument Strength on Persuasion , 2000 .

[128]  S. Posavac,et al.  Prepurchase Attribute Verifiability, Source Credibility, and Persuasion , 2001 .

[129]  Cal D. Stoltenberg,et al.  A test of the Elaboration Likelihood model for therapy , 1988, Cognitive Therapy and Research.