The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. A. Lumsdaine,et al. Experiments on mass communication, Vol. 3. , 1949 .
[2] C. I. Hovland,et al. The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness , 1951 .
[3] C I HOVLAND,et al. An experimental comparison of conclusion-drawing by the communicator and by the audience. , 1952, Journal of abnormal psychology.
[4] C. I. Hovland,et al. Reinstatement of the communicator in delayed measurement of opinion change. , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.
[5] P. Tannenbaum,et al. The Effects of Bylines on Attitude Change , 1961 .
[6] A. Bergin,et al. The effect of dissonant persuasive communications upon changes in a self-referring attitude. , 1962, Journal of personality.
[7] Leon Festinger,et al. The Effectiveness of "Overheard" Persuasive Communications , 1962 .
[8] A. H. Hill. CREDIBILTY, DISCREPANCY AND LATITUDE OF COMMUNICATION AS DIMENSIONS OF DISSONANCE INFLUENCING ATTITUDE CHANGE1 , 1963 .
[9] Elliot Aronson,et al. Communicator credibility and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion change. , 1963 .
[10] T H CHOO,et al. COMMUNICATOR CREDIBILITY AND COMMUNICATION DISCREPANCY AS DETERMINANTS OF OPINION CHANGE. , 1964, The Journal of social psychology.
[11] H. B. Green. SOCIALIZATION VALUES IN THE NEGRO AND EAST INDIAN SUBCULTURES OF TRINIDAD. , 1964, The Journal of social psychology.
[12] S. Kiesler,et al. ROLE OF FOREWARNING IN PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATIONS. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.
[13] W. Mcguire,et al. PERSISTENCE OF INDUCED OPINION CHANGE AND RETENTION OF THE INDUCING MESSAGE CONTENTS. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.
[14] G. Miller,et al. Source credibility and response to fear‐arousing communications , 1965 .
[15] E. Aronson,et al. OPINION CHANGE AS A FUNCTION OF THE COMMUNICATOR'S ATTRACTIVENESS AND DESIRE TO INFLUENCE. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[16] T. R. Husek. PERSUASIVE IMPACTS OF EARLY, LATE OR NO MENTION OF A NEGATIVE SOURCE. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[17] F. A. Powell. Source credibility and behavioral compliance as determinants of attitude change. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[18] G. Miller,et al. Some recent research on fear‐arousing message appeals , 1966 .
[19] J. Mills,et al. Opinion change as a function of the communicator's desire to influence and liking for the audience , 1966 .
[20] Elliot Aronson,et al. On increasing the persuasiveness of a low prestige communicator , 1966 .
[21] G. Miller,et al. THE EFFECTS OF LOW CREDIBLE SOURCES ON MESSAGE ACCEPTANCE: FOUR EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES IN PERSUASION , 1966 .
[22] S. Bochner,et al. Communicator discrepancy, source credibility, and opinion change. , 1966 .
[23] J. Mccroskey. Scales for the measurement of ethos , 1966 .
[24] Timothy C. Brock,et al. Communication discrepancy and intent to persuade as determinants of counterargument production , 1967 .
[25] H. H. Johnson,et al. Some effects of discrepancy level on relationships between authoritarianism and conformity. , 1967, The Journal of social psychology.
[26] B. Koslin,et al. Source characteristics and communication discrepancy as determinants of attitude change and conformity , 1967 .
[27] G. Miller,et al. Social approval and disapproval cues in anxiety‐arousing communications , 1967 .
[28] M. Brewer,et al. Attitude Change as a Function of Discrepancy and Source of Influence , 1968 .
[29] S. Strong. Counseling: An interpersonal influence process. , 1968 .
[30] J. Whitehead. Factors of source credibility , 1968 .
[31] H. H. Johnson,et al. The effects of source on responses to negative information about one's self. , 1968, The Journal of social psychology.
[32] Robert D. Meade,et al. Retention of Opinion Change as a Function of Differential Source Credibility: A Cross-Cultural Study , 1968 .
[33] H. H. Johnson,et al. Effects of source credibility on the relationship between authoritarianism and attitude change. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[34] I. Warren. The effect of credibility in sources of testimony on audience attitudes toward speaker and message , 1969 .
[35] E. J. Phares,et al. Attitude change as a function of internal-external control and communicator status. , 1969, Journal of personality.
[36] J. Mccroskey. A summary of experimental research on the effects of evidence in persuasive communication , 1969 .
[37] H. H. Johnson,et al. Effects of ego-involvement conditions on attitude change to high and low credibility communicators. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[38] H. H. Johnson,et al. Relationship between authoritarianism and attitude change as a function of source credibility and type of communication. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[39] James B. Lemert,et al. DIMENSIONS FOR EVALUATING THE ACCEPTABILITY OF MESSAGE SOURCES , 1969 .
[40] John R. Baseheart,et al. Source trustworthiness, opinionated statements, and response to persuasive communication , 1969 .
[41] William D. Crano,et al. Effects of Sex, Response Order, and Expertise in Conformity: A Dispositional Approach* , 1970 .
[42] C. Hendrick,et al. Effects of extraneous fear arousal and birth order on attitude change , 1970 .
[43] Ramon J. Rhine,et al. Ego-involvement, discrepancy, source credibility, and attitude change. , 1970 .
[44] G. I. Schulman,et al. SALIENCE PATTERNS, SOURCE CREDIBILITY, AND THE SLEEPER EFFECT , 1970 .
[45] D. R. Shaffer,et al. Effects of arousal and credibility on learning and persuasion , 1970 .
[46] Opinionated statements and attitude intensity as predictors of attitude change and source credibility , 1970 .
[47] G. Miller,et al. Source evaluation, syllogistic content, and judgments of logical validity by high- and low-dogmatic persons. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[48] C. D. Ward,et al. Persuasive Effects of Early and Late Mention of Credible and Noncredible Sources. Three Cross-Cultural Experiments. , 1970 .
[49] James C. McCroskey,et al. The effects of evidence as an inhibitor of counter‐persuasion , 1970 .
[50] William A. Watts,et al. Forewarning effects in persuasion: Field and classroom experiments. , 1971 .
[51] J. Harvey,et al. Opinion Change as a Function of When Information About the Communicator Is Received and Whether He Is Attractive or Expert. , 1972 .
[52] D. Hays,et al. Effect of Dogmatism and Authority of the Source of Communication upon Persuasion , 1972, Psychological reports.
[53] Ronald L. Applbaum,et al. Dimensions of source credibility: A test for reproducibility , 1973 .
[54] H. Kassinove,et al. Effect of Perceived Expertise, Strength of Advice, and Environmental Setting on Parental Compliance , 1973 .
[55] J. A. Ross. Influence of Expert and Peer upon Negro Mothers of Low Socioeconomic Status , 1973 .
[56] K. Weick,et al. The Effect of Composer Credibility on Orchestra Performance , 1973 .
[57] E. McGinnies. Initial attitude, source credibility, and involvement as factors in persuasion , 1973 .
[58] C. Hendrick,et al. Communicator credibility and persuasian , 1974, Memory & cognition.
[59] Arch G. Woodside,et al. The Effect of Salesman Similarity and Expertise on Consumer Purchasing Behavior , 1974 .
[60] C. D. Ward,et al. Persuasibility as a function of source credibility and locus of control: five cross cultural experiments. , 1974, Journal of personality.
[61] H. Kassinove,et al. Effects of Required Effort, Perceived Expertise, and Sex on Teacher Compliance , 1974 .
[62] A. Greenwald,et al. Is it time to lay the sleeper effect to rest , 1974 .
[63] Joann Horai,et al. The Effects of Expertise and Physical Attractiveness Upon Opinion Agreement and Liking , 1974 .
[64] R. Glen Hass,et al. Temporal delay, type of forewarning, and resistance to influence , 1975 .
[65] Douglas G. Bock,et al. The impact of source credibility, attitude valence, and task sensitization on trait errors in speech evaluation , 1975 .
[66] Stephen Worchel,et al. Is the Medium the Message? A Study of the Effects of Media, Communicator, and Message Characteristics on Attitude Change1 , 1975 .
[67] C. R. Snyder,et al. Effects of source status and message favorability on acceptance of personality feedback. , 1976, The Journal of applied psychology.
[68] Jo Liska,et al. A critique of factor analytic approaches to the study of credibility , 1976 .
[69] D. Zillmann,et al. The Persuasive Effectiveness of the Peer Appeal and a Communicator's First-Hand Experience , 1976 .
[70] Effects of Price and Salesman Expertise on Customer Purchasing Behavior , 1976 .
[71] T. Wasserman,et al. Effects of Type of Recommendation, Attire, and Perceived Expertise on Parental Compliance , 1976 .
[72] Hershey H. Friedman,et al. THE EFFECTS OF ENDORSEMENTS ON PRODUCT EVALUATION , 1977 .
[73] B. Sternthal,et al. Highly Credible Sources: Persuasive Facilitators or Persuasive Liabilities? , 1977 .
[74] L. Phillips,et al. The persuasive effect of source credibility: a situational analysis. , 1978, Public opinion quarterly.
[75] Alice M. Tybout. Relative Effectiveness of Three Behavioral Influence Strategies as Supplements to Persuasion in a Marketing Context , 1978 .
[76] Kouhei Suzuki,et al. ACCEPTANCE AND REJECTION OF A SUGGESTION , 1978 .
[77] Stephen Worchel,et al. Effects of Media, Communicator,and Message Position onAttitude Change , 1978 .
[78] Patient compliance with advice as a function of communicator expertise. , 1978, The Journal of social psychology.
[79] Clark Leavitt,et al. The Persuasive Effect of Source Credibility: Tests of Cognitive Response , 1978 .
[80] John T. Cacioppo,et al. Effects of Forwarning of Persuasive Intent and Involvement on Cognitive Responses and Persuasion , 1979 .
[81] Crédibilité de l'émetteur, crédibilité du message, et dissuasion: expérimentation en milieu suburbain , 1980 .
[82] C. D. Ward,et al. Better Liked than Right , 1980 .
[83] R. W. Rogers,et al. Effects of source expertness, physical attractiveness, and supporting arguments on persuasion: A case of brains over beauty. , 1980 .
[84] J. Cacioppo,et al. Personal involvement as a determinant of argument based persuasion , 1981 .
[85] Daniel M. Wegner,et al. Incrimination through innuendo: Can media questions become public answers? , 1981 .
[86] T. Cook,et al. Cognitive tuning set, source credibility, and the temporal persistence of attitude change , 1982 .
[87] Robert R. Harmon,et al. The Persuasive Effects of Source Credibility in Buy and Lease Situations , 1982 .
[88] M. Heesacker,et al. Field dependence and attitude change: Source credibility can alter persuasion by affecting message-relevant thinking , 1983 .
[89] Rebecca Elmore-Yalch,et al. The Effect of Numbers on the Route to Persuasion , 1984 .
[90] B. Sternthal,et al. Detecting and Explaining the Sleeper Effect , 1984 .
[91] R. Feldman. The influence of communicator characteristics on the nutrition attitudes and behavior of high school students. , 1984, The Journal of school health.
[92] James M. Olson,et al. Source credibility, attitudes, and the recall of past behaviours , 1984 .
[93] S. Lirtzman,et al. Credibility of Sources of Communication on Products' Safety Hazards , 1986, Psychological reports.
[94] D. L. Moore,et al. Time Compression, Response Opportunity, and Persuasion , 1986 .
[95] B. Bannister,et al. Performance outcome feedback and attributional feedback: interactive effects on recipient responses , 1986 .
[96] Robert D. St. Louis,et al. Explaining Consumers' Reactions to Price Changes in Service Industries , 1987 .
[97] D. R. Shaffer,et al. Susceptibility to persuasive appeals as a function of source credibility and prior experience with the attitude object. , 1987 .
[98] M. Laroche,et al. Compensatory Effects of Cognitive Characteristics of the Source, the Message, and the Receiver Upon Attitude Change , 1988 .
[99] J. M. Olson,et al. Uncertainty orientation and persuasion: Individual differences in the effects of personal relevance on social judgments. , 1988 .
[100] Kenneth G. DeBono,et al. Source expertise, source attractiveness, and the processing of persuasive information: A functional approach. , 1988 .
[101] Carl A. Kallgren,et al. Communicator Attributes and Persuasion , 1988, Personality & social psychology bulletin.
[102] Anne Maass,et al. The role of social categorization and perceived source credibility in minority influence , 1988 .
[103] Cal D. Stoltenberg,et al. Career and Study Skills Information: Who Says What Can Alter Message Processing , 1988 .
[104] Jean Perrien,et al. Limits of Credibility: The Case of Political Persuasion , 1990 .
[105] Jeffery J. Mondak. Perceived legitimacy of Supreme Court decisions: Three functions of source credibility , 1990 .
[106] John E. Hunter,et al. An Empirical Test of an Axiomatic Model of the Relationship Between Language Intensity and Persuasion , 1990 .
[107] Terence A. Shimp,et al. Effects of involvement, argument strength, and source characteristics on central and peripheral processing of advertising , 1990 .
[108] Changing attitudes regarding the effectiveness of cognitive restructuring for treating depression , 1990 .
[109] J. Hartwick,et al. The Effects of Advertiser Reputation and Extremity of Advertising Claim on Advertising Effectiveness , 1990 .
[110] Lynn R. Kahle,et al. Source Expertise, Time of Source Identification, and Involvement in Persuasion: An Elaborative Processing Perspective , 1990 .
[111] Roobina Ohanian. The impact of celebrity spokespersons' perceived image on consumers' intention to purchase. , 1991 .
[112] Alan D. Bright,et al. A model for assessing the effects of communication on recreationists. , 1991 .
[113] S. Ratneshwar,et al. The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Persuasion , 1997 .
[114] Kenneth G. DeBono,et al. Repressors, sensitizers, source expertise, and persuasion , 1992 .
[115] David Mazursky,et al. Learning from the ad or relying on related attitudes: The moderating role of involvement , 1992 .
[116] Kenneth G. DeBono,et al. Source Expertise and Persuasion: The Moderating Role of Recipient Dogmatism , 1993 .
[117] S. Chaiken,et al. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[118] Paul E. Levy,et al. The Effects of Source Credibility and Performance Rating Discrepancy on Reactions to Multiple Raters1 , 1995 .
[119] L. Johnston,et al. A Dual Processing Approach to Stereotype Change , 1995 .
[120] M. Slater,et al. How Message Evaluation and Source Attributes May Influence Credibility Assessment and Belief Change , 1996 .
[121] Sudhir K. Chawla,et al. “Fitness” Marketing: Celebrity or Non-Celebrity Endorsement? , 1997 .
[122] Min-Sun Kim,et al. A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Effects of Source Credibility on Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions , 1998 .
[123] Jason Hart,et al. Are the Tabloids Always Wrong or Is That Just What We Think? Need for Cognition and Perceptions of Articles in Print Media , 1999 .
[124] Margaret Higgins,et al. Meta-Information, and Time: Factors in Human Decision Making , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[125] Yong Zhang,et al. Moderating Effects of Need for Cognition on Responses to Positively versus Negatively Framed Advertising Messages , 1999 .
[126] Barbara A. Lafferty,et al. The Impact of Corporate Credibility and Celebrity Credibility on Consumer Reaction to Advertisements and Brands , 2000 .
[127] Chanthika Pornpitakpan,et al. The Effect of Cultural Differences, Source Expertise, and Argument Strength on Persuasion , 2000 .
[128] S. Posavac,et al. Prepurchase Attribute Verifiability, Source Credibility, and Persuasion , 2001 .
[129] Cal D. Stoltenberg,et al. A test of the Elaboration Likelihood model for therapy , 1988, Cognitive Therapy and Research.