The Impact of Operational User Participation on Perceived System Implementation Success: An Empirical Investigation

Researchers have found that some system design activities for users are effective in terms of satisfaction and commitment (13), user involvement and user attitude (12) and performance (12, 13). As Markus and Mao (19) suggest, activities in different stages of the life cycle and participants should be clearly defined and studied. Many researchers (7, 16, 20, 30) suggest that user participation in the analysis stage should be more important to system success than user participation in the design stage. Most of these studies have focused only on those project team members who have been assigned formal responsibility within the project scope instead of on the operational users who have no formal responsibility within the project scope but their work life will be affected by the system. The relative contribution of operational end user participation, in the different stages has, to date, not been empirically investigated. This study reports the results of a laboratory experiment to investigate the impact of operational end user participation in two important stages of the system development life cycle: analysis and design on perceived participation, intention to use, process satisfaction and perceived ownership. There were 210 students from 3 universities in the United States who voluntarily participated in this experiment. The General Linear Model and a Structural Equation Modeling technique were used to analyze the data collected to test the hypotheses. The major findings indicate that when users are not assigned any formal project development responsibility, user participation and desire to participate still has a significant influence on perceived participation and perceived participation has a significant influence on intention to use, process satisfaction and perceived ownership. In both stages, users perceiving higher participation perceived higher process satisfaction, ownership, and intention to use than users who perceived lower participation. Further, user participation in the analysis activities led to higher, but not significant, perceived participation than user participation in the design activities. This study showed preliminary evidence that after meaningful participation in one stage of analysis or design activities, further material participation in other stages may not be necessary to promote user satisfaction with the process. The results of this study suggest a basis for resource allocation with regard to end user participation in systems development projects.

[1]  F NunamakerJay,et al.  Enabling the effective involvement of multiple users , 1997 .

[2]  Daniel Robey,et al.  User Involvement in Information System Development: A Conflict Model and Empirical Test , 1982 .

[3]  Keng Siau,et al.  Improving the quality of conceptual modeling using cognitive mapping techniques , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..

[4]  Henri Barki,et al.  Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude , 1994, MIS Q..

[5]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Implementation Process: A Change Approach , 1979, MIS Q..

[6]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Participation in Development and Implementation - Updating An Old, Tired Concept for Today's IS Contexts , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Angèle L. M. Cavaye,et al.  User participation in system development revisited , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[8]  W. Doll,et al.  A discrepancy model of end-user computing involvement , 1989 .

[9]  Mark I. Hwang,et al.  The effect of user engagement on system success: A meta-analytical integration of research findings , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[10]  Anders Edstrom,et al.  User Influence and the Success of MIS Projects: A Contingency Approach , 1977 .

[11]  K. Siau,et al.  Technical communication in information systems development: the use of cognitive mapping , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[12]  James D. McKeen Successful Development Strategies for Business Application Systems , 1983, MIS Q..

[13]  C. R. Franz,et al.  Group process and conflict in system development , 1989 .

[14]  Naveed Saleem,et al.  An Empirical Test of the Contingency Approach to User Participation in Information Systems Development , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Jinjoo Lee,et al.  An exploratory contingency model of user participation and MIS use , 1986, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Enabling the Effective Involvement of Multiple Users: Methods and Tools for Collaborative Software Engineering , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Henri Barki,et al.  Interpersonal Conflict and Its Management in Information System Development , 2001, MIS Q..

[18]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Perceptions of Conflict and Success in Information Systems Development Projects , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Early Diagnosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions , 1981 .

[20]  George M. Marakas Systems Analysis and Design: An Active Approach , 2000 .

[21]  Blake Ives,et al.  User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research , 1984 .

[22]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Experiences extended across time: Evaluation of moments and episodes , 1992 .

[23]  Henri Barki,et al.  Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use , 1994 .

[24]  Henri Barki,et al.  Rethinking the Concept of User Involvement , 1989, MIS Q..

[25]  M. Gordon,et al.  The “Science of the Sophomore” Revisited: from Conjecture to Empiricism , 1986 .

[26]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Key Recurrent Issues in the MIS Implementation Process , 1981, MIS Q..

[27]  James E. Hunton,et al.  Effects of User Participation in Systems Development: A Longitudinal Field Experiment , 1997, MIS Q..

[28]  James E. Hunton,et al.  Effects of the user participation process and task meaningfulness on key information system outcomes , 1997 .

[29]  H OlsonMargrethe,et al.  User Involvement and MIS Success , 1984 .

[30]  Tsang-Hsiung Lee,et al.  The Effects Of User Participation On System Success: Toward A Contingency Theory Of User Satisfaction , 1991, ICIS.

[31]  Michael Newman,et al.  User Involvement as an Interaction Process: A Case Study , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..