Opinion Dynamics with Varying Susceptibility to Persuasion

A long line of work in social psychology has studied variations in people's susceptibility to persuasion -- the extent to which they are willing to modify their opinions on a topic. This body of literature suggests an interesting perspective on theoretical models of opinion formation on social networks: in addition to considering interventions that directly modify people's intrinsic opinions, it is also natural to consider those that modify people's susceptibility to persuasion. Here, we adopt a popular model for social opinion dynamics, and formalize the opinion maximization and minimization problems where interventions happen at the level of susceptibility. We show that modeling interventions at the level of susceptibility leads to an interesting family of new questions in network opinion dynamics. We find that the questions are quite different depending on whether there is an overall budget constraining the number of agents we can target or not. We give a polynomial-time algorithm for finding the optimal target-set to optimize the sum of opinions when there are no budget constraints on the size of the target-set. We show that this problem is NP-hard when there is a budget, and that the objective function is neither submodular nor supermodular. Finally, we propose a heuristic for the budgeted opinion optimization problem and show its efficacy at finding target-sets that optimize the sum of opinions on real world networks, including a Twitter network with real opinion estimates.

[1]  William J. McGuire,et al.  Some Contemporary Approaches , 1964 .

[2]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  Boris E. R. de Ruyter,et al.  Can You Be Persuaded? Individual Differences in Susceptibility to Persuasion , 2009, INTERACT.

[4]  R. Petty,et al.  What doesn't kill me makes me stronger: the effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing , 2002, KDD.

[6]  Donald E. Knuth,et al.  The Stanford GraphBase - a platform for combinatorial computing , 1993 .

[7]  W. Evans,et al.  Measuring Peer Group Effects: A Study of Teenage Behavior , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  G. Giovino,et al.  Effects of Anti-Smoking Advertising on Youth Smoking: A Review , 2003, Journal of health communication.

[9]  Kamesh Munagala,et al.  Modeling opinion dynamics in social networks , 2014, WSDM.

[10]  Yansong Hu,et al.  Nonmonotonic Status Effects in New Product Adoption , 2014, Mark. Sci..

[11]  R. Srikant,et al.  Opinion dynamics in social networks: A local interaction game with stubborn agents , 2012, 2013 American Control Conference.

[12]  S. Asch Opinions and Social Pressure , 1955, Nature.

[13]  C. Heath,et al.  Where Consumers Diverge from Others: Identity Signaling and Product Domains , 2007 .

[14]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Mining the network value of customers , 2001, KDD '01.

[15]  W. Zachary,et al.  An Information Flow Model for Conflict and Fission in Small Groups , 1977, Journal of Anthropological Research.

[16]  J. Allen,et al.  Leaders and followers in adolescent close friendships: Susceptibility to peer influence as a predictor of risky behavior, friendship instability, and depression , 2006, Development and Psychopathology.

[17]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Graph evolution: Densification and shrinking diameters , 2006, TKDD.

[18]  Kai Kupferschmidt,et al.  The science of persuasion. , 2017, Science.

[19]  Aristides Gionis,et al.  Opinion Maximization in Social Networks , 2013, SDM.

[20]  Abhimanyu Das,et al.  Debiasing social wisdom , 2013, KDD.

[21]  Charalampos E. Tsourakakis,et al.  Minimizing Polarization and Disagreement in Social Networks , 2017, WWW.

[22]  T. Power,et al.  Susceptibility to Antisocial Peer Pressure and Its Relation to Acculturation in Mexican-American Adolescents , 1993 .

[23]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  An Integrative Framework for Understanding Two-sided Persuasion , 1994 .

[24]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Mitigating Overexposure in Viral Marketing , 2017, AAAI.

[25]  R. Cialdini Influence: Science and Practice , 1984 .

[26]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network , 2015, Theory Comput..

[27]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[28]  Yogesh V. Joshi,et al.  Turf Wars: Product Line Strategies in Competitive Markets , 2015, Mark. Sci..

[29]  Niloy Ganguly,et al.  Learning a Linear Influence Model from Transient Opinion Dynamics , 2014, CIKM.

[30]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  How Bad is Forming Your Own Opinion? , 2011, 2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[31]  Renato Paes Leme,et al.  Role of conformity in opinion dynamics in social networks , 2014, COSN '14.

[32]  L. Steinberg,et al.  Age differences in resistance to peer influence. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[33]  Konstantin Avrachenkov,et al.  Cooperative Game Theory Approaches for Network Partitioning , 2017, COCOON.

[34]  Hansjörg Neth,et al.  Social Influence and the Collective Dynamics of Opinion Formation , 2013, PloS one.

[35]  M. Degroot Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[36]  Jacob R. Neiheisel,et al.  On the Limits of Persuasion: Campaign Ads and the Structure of Voters’ Interpersonal Discussion Networks , 2015 .

[37]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  Source Credibility and Attitude Certainty: A Metacognitive Analysis of Resistance to Persuasion , 2004 .

[38]  T E Dielman,et al.  Susceptibility to peer pressure as an explanatory variable for the differential effectiveness of an alcohol misuse prevention program in elementary schools. , 1992, The Journal of school health.

[39]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Local Higher-Order Graph Clustering , 2017, KDD.

[40]  Edith G. Smit,et al.  Strategies and motives for resistance to persuasion: an integrative framework , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[41]  Yvonne de Kort,et al.  Persuasive Technology for Human Well-Being: Setting the Scene , 2006, PERSUASIVE.

[42]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Opinion Dynamics and Learning in Social Networks , 2010, Dyn. Games Appl..