ASSeSSINg the fIeld pl AcemeNt IN INItIAl teAcher educA tIoN: fINdINg A bAl ANce betweeN formA tIVe ANd SummA tIVe ASSeSSmeNt

The research study reported in this paper explores the issues and challenges faced by teacher educators when assessing student-teachers during their field placement. The key research question is: What are the issues and challenges faced by teacher educators and university administrators in relation to the formative and summative assessment of student-teachers during their field placement in Initial Teacher education? The research tries to address this question by drawing on qualitative data from interviews with key academics and administrators at the University of Malta. The data from the interviews suggests that finding a balance within a university setting between the formative and summative aspects of assess ment can create a potential conflict. This results in teacher educators focusing more on administrative demands for accountability and standards through summative assessment (also known as ‘assessment of learning’) rather than on the learning process through formative assessment (also known as ‘assessment for learning’). The authors challenge this current view and, using examples from good practice, construct a model of assessment for the field placement that tries to improve the balance between formative and summative assessment.

[1]  Governing student assessment: administrative rules, silenced academics and performing students , 2011 .

[2]  Kenneth M. Zeichner Beyond Traditional Structures of Student Teaching. , 2002 .

[3]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Authentic assessment of teaching in context , 2000 .

[4]  P. Black,et al.  Developing the theory of formative assessment , 2009 .

[5]  P. Cope,et al.  Grading the practice of teaching: an unholy union of incompatibles , 2003 .

[6]  Christopher Bezzina,et al.  The Professional Development of Teachers in Malta , 2001 .

[7]  C. Cloke,et al.  Standards for the Award of Qualified Teacher Status: Reflections on assessment implications , 2000 .

[8]  Mandy Asghar,et al.  The lived experience of formative assessment practice in a British university , 2012 .

[9]  Peter Ferguson,et al.  Student perceptions of quality feedback in teacher education , 2011 .

[10]  Louis Volante,et al.  Responding to the Challenges Posed by Summative Teacher Candidate Evaluation: A collaborative self-study of practicum supervision by faculty , 2009 .

[11]  D. Royce Sadler,et al.  Grade integrity and the representation of academic achievement , 2009 .

[12]  Catherine Montgomery,et al.  Assessment for Learning in Higher Education , 2012 .

[14]  C. Harrison,et al.  Investigating university tutor perceptions of assessment feedback: three types of tutor beliefs , 2011 .

[15]  C. Beck,et al.  Components of a Good Practicum Placement: Student Teacher Perceptions. , 2002 .

[16]  Peter Mayo Competitiveness, diversification and the international higher education cash flow: the EU's higher education discourse amidst the challenges of globalisation , 2009 .

[17]  Kari Smith Assessing the Practicum in teacher education – Do we want candidates and mentors to agree? , 2010 .

[18]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[19]  Christopher DeLuca,et al.  Assessment literacy development: identifying gaps in teacher candidates’ learning , 2010 .

[20]  Val Klenowski,et al.  Assessment for Learning revisited: an Asia-Pacific perspective , 2009 .

[21]  R. Sultana Developing a Vision for Teacher Education Programmes: A Values-Based Approach. , 1995 .