Patient and staff dosimetry in neuroradiological procedures.

Cerebral angiography provides valuable information for use in the clinical management of patients but can result in relatively high radiation doses to patients and staff due to the extended fluoroscopy time and number of images acquired during an examination. In this study, extremity doses to radiologists and scrub nurses working in a neuroradiological centre were monitored during a 3 month period using thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs). Electronic personal dosemeters were also used to monitor doses above the lead apron at chest height to the radiologists, radiographers and the scrub nurses. Patient doses were recorded using a dose-area product meter whilst patient thyroid dose was measured using TLDs. Two types of examination were studied: cerebral angiography and arterial embolization. It was deduced from the results of the study that the radiologist may expect to receive a mean dose above the lead apron at chest height of 11 microSv and 25 microSv per examination when performing cerebral angiography and arterial embolization, respectively. A radiologist mean hand dose of 19.3 microSv per examination was found, whilst the average eye dose for both radiologist and scrub nurse was 13.4 microSv per examination. The patient dosimetry results revealed a mean thyroid dose of 1.7 mSv and a dose-area product of 48.5 Gy cm2 for cerebral angiography. Average dose-area product for arterial embolization was 122.2 Gy cm2 along with a mean patient thyroid dose of 3.3 mSv. More detailed patient dosimetry was also performed using a Rando anthropomorphic phantom loaded with TLDs to measure organ doses and hence estimate effective dose. A typical four vessel angiogram was found to result in a patient effective dose of 3.6 mSv.

[1]  H. Portnoy,et al.  Clinical dosimetry during cerebral arteriography , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[2]  B. Wall,et al.  Estimation of effective dose from dose-area product measurements for barium meals and barium enemas. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  B. Wall,et al.  Estimation of effective dose in diagnostic radiology from entrance surface dose and dose-area product measurements , 1994 .

[4]  J. Law,et al.  A Critical Comparison of Five Different Mammographic Phantoms under Different Radiographic Conditions , 1993 .

[5]  Patient doses received during digital subtraction angiography , 1993 .

[6]  K. Faulkner,et al.  The relationship of effective dose to personnel and monitor reading for simulated fluoroscopic irradiation conditions. , 1993, Health physics.

[7]  K. Faulkner Personal monitoring during fluoroscopy , 1992 .

[8]  J C Le Heron,et al.  Estimation of effective dose to the patient during medical x-ray examinations from measurements of the dose-area product. , 1992 .

[9]  J. Malone,et al.  An International Intercomparison of Dose-Area Product Meters , 1992 .

[10]  W Huda,et al.  Effective dose equivalents to patients undergoing cerebral angiography. , 1992, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  K. Faulkner,et al.  The dependence of the scattered radiation dose to personnel on technique factors in diagnostic radiology. , 1992, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  A. A. Mustafa,et al.  Organ doses from cardiac and carotid digital subtraction angiography. , 1989, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  Golikov Vy,et al.  Estimation of the mean organ doses and the effective dose equivalent from Rando phantom measurements. , 1989 .

[14]  F. Mettler,et al.  The radiologist and angiographic procedures. Absorbed radiation dose. , 1987, Investigative radiology.

[15]  Radiation dose to critical organs of staff and patients during neuroradiology. , 1979, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  G. du Boulay,et al.  Letter: Radiation dose measurements to the eyes during cerebral angiography. , 1976, The British journal of radiology.