Two-Part Models Capture the Impact of Gain on Pointing Performance

We establish that two-part models of pointing performance (Welford’s model) describe pointing on a computer display significantly better than traditional one-part models (Fitts’s Law). We explore the space of pointing models and describe how independent contributions of movement amplitude and target width to pointing time can be captured in a parameter k. Through a reanalysis of data from related work we demonstrate that one-part formulations are fragile in describing pointing performance, and that this fragility is present for various devices and techniques. We show that this same data can be significantly better described using two-part models. Finally, we demonstrate through further analysis of previous work and new experimental data that k increases linearly with gain. Our primary contribution is the demonstration that Fitts’s Law is more limited in applicability than previously appreciated, and that more robust models, such as Welford’s formulation, should be adopted in many cases of practical interest.

[1]  Sarah A. Douglas,et al.  Differences in movement microstructure of the mouse and the finger-controlled isometric joystick , 1996, CHI.

[2]  Brian D. Fisher,et al.  Mouse and touchscreen selection in the upper and lower visual fields , 2004, CHI.

[3]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Supporting transitions in work: informing large display application design by understanding whiteboard use , 2009, GROUP.

[4]  Olivier Chapuis,et al.  Effects of motor scale, visual scale, and quantization on small target acquisition difficulty , 2011, TCHI.

[5]  Kellogg S. Booth,et al.  Mid-air text input techniques for very large wall displays , 2009, Graphics Interface.

[6]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces , 2004, CSCW.

[7]  Sung H. Han,et al.  A Comparison of Four Input Devices for the Macintosh Interface , 1990 .

[8]  Jay Pratt,et al.  Visual layout modulates Fitts’s law: The importance of first and last positions , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  D. Chaffin,et al.  An investigation of fitts' law using a wide range of movement amplitudes. , 1976, Journal of motor behavior.

[10]  Heiko Drewes,et al.  Only one Fitts' law formula please! , 2010, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[11]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[12]  Jelle Jolles,et al.  Selective reaching: evidence for multiple frames of reference. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys, for text selection on a CRT , 1987 .

[14]  Ted Selker,et al.  Force-to-motion functions for pointing , 1990, INTERACT.

[15]  Daniel J. Wigdor,et al.  Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays , 2007, CHI.

[16]  Kori Inkpen,et al.  Drag-and-drop versus point-and-click mouse interaction styles for children , 2001 .

[17]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[18]  Nicolas Roussel,et al.  No more bricolage!: methods and tools to characterize, replicate and compare pointing transfer functions , 2011, UIST.

[19]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  How do people organize their desks?: Implications for the design of office information systems , 1983, TOIS.

[20]  Gerald J. Hahn,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis (2nd Ed.) , 2012 .

[21]  Yves Guiard,et al.  Navigation as multiscale pointing: extending Fitts' model to very high precision tasks , 1999, CHI '99.

[22]  Christine L. MacKenzie,et al.  Pointing on a computer display , 1995, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[23]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis: Draper/Applied Regression Analysis , 1998 .

[24]  Kori Inkpen Quinn,et al.  Drag-and-drop versus point-and-click mouse interaction styles for children , 2001, TCHI.

[25]  Bernd Fröhlich,et al.  The two-user Responsive Workbench: support for collaboration through individual views of a shared space , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[26]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: which way is best? , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[27]  E. Hoffmann A comparison of hand and foot movement times. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[28]  Ravin Balakrishnan,et al.  Fitts' law and expanding targets: Experimental studies and designs for user interfaces , 2005, TCHI.

[29]  Anthony J. Hornof,et al.  Visual search and mouse-pointing in labeled versus unlabeled two-dimensional visual hierarchies , 2001, TCHI.

[30]  Takeo Igarashi,et al.  Flatland: new dimensions in office whiteboards , 1999, CHI '99.

[31]  Kellogg S. Booth,et al.  "Oh Snap" - Helping Users Align Digital Objects on Touch Interfaces , 2011, INTERACT.

[32]  C. L. Radix,et al.  Extension of Fitts' law to modeling motion performance in man-machine interfaces , 1999, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[33]  Anthony Tang,et al.  Shadow reaching: a new perspective on interaction for large displays , 2007, UIST.

[34]  Todd J. Johnsgard Fitt?s law with a virtual reality glove and a mouse: effects of gain , 1994 .

[35]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[36]  R. Kerr,et al.  Movement time in an underwater environment. , 1973, Journal of motor behavior.

[37]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Lag as a determinant of human performance in interactive systems , 1993, INTERCHI.

[38]  Joel S. Greenstein,et al.  Is Display/Control Gain a Useful Metric for Optimizing an Interface? , 1990 .

[39]  Barry Fowler,et al.  Perceptual-Motor Performance and Associated Kinematics in Space , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[40]  K. Gegenfurtner,et al.  Design Issues in Gaze Guidance Under review with ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction , 2009 .

[41]  M Akamatsu,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Ergonomics a Comparison of Tactile, Auditory, and Visual Feedback in a Pointing Task Using a Mouse-type Device , 2022 .

[42]  Robert Sessions Woodworth,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1899 .

[43]  Tom Jones,et al.  An Empirical Study of Children's Use of Computer Pointing Devices , 1991 .

[44]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts' law research in HCI , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[45]  Brian W. Epps Comparison of Six Cursor Control Devices Based on Fitts' Law Models , 1986 .

[46]  A. T. Welford,et al.  The fundamentals of skill , 1968 .

[47]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Dynamo: a public interactive surface supporting the cooperative sharing and exchange of media , 2003, UIST '03.

[48]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Drag-and-Pop and Drag-and-Pick: Techniques for Accessing Remote Screen Content on Touch- and Pen-Operated Systems , 2003, INTERACT.

[49]  Yves Guiard,et al.  The problem of consistency in the design of Fitts' law experiments: consider either target distance and width or movement form and scale , 2009, CHI.

[50]  Jeffrey Nichols,et al.  Interacting at a distance: measuring the performance of laser pointers and other devices , 2002, CHI.

[51]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  The introduction of a shared interactive surface into a communal space , 2004, CSCW.

[52]  Robert DeLine,et al.  Let's go to the whiteboard: how and why software developers use drawings , 2007, CHI.

[53]  Ravin Balakrishnan,et al.  Evaluating tactile feedback and direct vs. indirect stylus input in pointing and crossing selection tasks , 2008, CHI.

[54]  Yoshifumi Kitamura,et al.  Body-centric interaction techniques for very large wall displays , 2010, NordiCHI.

[55]  George W. Fitzmaurice,et al.  A remote control interface for large displays , 2004, UIST '04.

[56]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  A human motor behavior model for distal pointing tasks , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[57]  I.,et al.  Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[58]  Daniel Vogel,et al.  The Impact of Control-Display Gain on User Performance in Pointing Tasks , 2008, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[59]  W. Schofield,et al.  Do Children Find Movements Which Cross the Body Midline Difficult? , 1976 .

[60]  Anastasia Bezerianos,et al.  The vacuum: facilitating the manipulation of distant objects , 2005, CHI.

[61]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  An error model for pointing based on Fitts' law , 2008, CHI.

[62]  J. Sandfeld,et al.  Effect of computer mouse gain and visual demand on mouse clicking performance and muscle activation in a young and elderly group of experienced computer users. , 2005, Applied ergonomics.

[63]  Brian D. Fisher,et al.  Comparing cursor orientations for mouse, pointer, and pen interaction , 2005, CHI.

[64]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[65]  Tovi Grossman,et al.  Pointing at trivariate targets in 3D environments , 2004, CHI.

[66]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Prediction of Pointing and Dragging Times in Graphical User Interfaces , 1994, Interact. Comput..

[67]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  A comparison of input devices in element pointing and dragging tasks , 1991, CHI.

[68]  Sarah A. Douglas,et al.  Testing pointing device performance and user assessment with the ISO 9241, Part 9 standard , 1999, CHI '99.

[69]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff in Fitts' law tasks-on the equivalency of actual and nominal pointing precision , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[70]  Kellogg S. Booth,et al.  Fitts''Law Studies of Directional Mouse Movement , 1991 .

[71]  井口 道生 W. Strunk, Jr. and E.B. White: The Elements of Style, MacMillan Co,, New York, 1959, 71頁, 13×21cm, $2.95. Paperback 11×17cm, $0.95 , 1971 .

[72]  Christine L. MacKenzie,et al.  Physical versus virtual pointing , 1996, CHI.

[73]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Semi-public displays for small, co-located groups , 2003, CHI '03.

[74]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[75]  Richard C. Simpson,et al.  Toward Goldilocks' pointing device: determining a "just right" gain setting for users with physical impairments , 2005, Assets '05.

[76]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Human on-line response to target expansion , 2003, CHI '03.

[77]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Effects of output display and control - display gain on human performance in interactive systems , 1994, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[78]  William Buxton Surface and Tangible Computing, and the "Small" Matter of People and Design , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference - Digest of Technical Papers.

[79]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1966 .

[80]  Tom Jones,et al.  Psychology of Computer Use: XVI. Effect of Computer-Pointing Devices on Children's Processing Rate , 1989, Perceptual and motor skills.

[81]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Fitts' throughput and the speed-accuracy tradeoff , 2008, CHI.

[82]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Extending Fitts' law to two-dimensional tasks , 1992, CHI.