A Study of the Value and Impact of Electronic Commerce: Electronic Versus Traditional Replenishment in Supply Chains

The area of electronic commerce (EC) is receiving a great deal of attention in academia and organizations. Many organizations are choosing to implement EC without regard to the positive or negative impact, or the potential it may have on the organization. Organizations implement EC without knowing the impact of EC on the organization. Supply chain management (SCM) is an application of EC; therefore, the impact of EC is seen throughout the supply chain (SC). This study determines the difference in value between electronic and traditional SCs and attempts to determine whether electronic systems are more effective than nonelectronic (traditional, manual) systems by analyzing customer-supplier relationships in SCs. Similar products are analyzed in pairs, one product using an electronic SC and one product using a nonelectronic SC. The empirical findings indicate that an electronic SC is more effective than a nonelectronic SC and improves the SC replenishment process in terms of: (a) lower inventory levels, (b) lower inventory carrying cost, (c) fewer stockouts, (d) shorter order cycles, (e) lower prices (costs), and (f) greater availability of products. These findings provide businesses with a measure to evaluate their EC systems and enable them to justify the investment (time and money) in EC systems.

[1]  Dhruv Grewal,et al.  THE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION/LOGISTICS INTERFACE. , 1995 .

[2]  K. Cameron Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness , 1986 .

[3]  I. Lewis,et al.  LOGISTICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: A COORDINATION PERSPECTIVE. , 1997 .

[4]  Chiara Francalanci,et al.  Measuring the Financial Benefits of IT Investments on Coordination , 1999 .

[5]  James A. Senn Capitalizing on Electronic Commerce - The Role of the Internet in Electronic Markets , 1996, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[6]  Michael Browne,et al.  Logistics Performance in Europe: The Challenge of 1992 , 1990 .

[7]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  The Link Between Information Strategy and Electronic Commerce , 1997, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[8]  Warren Rose Logistics management: Systems and components , 1979 .

[9]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  M. Morton,et al.  Electronic data interchange: How much competitive advantage? , 1990 .

[11]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  How open data networks influence business performance and market structure , 1996, CACM.

[12]  M. Shaw,et al.  The impact of information sharing on order fulfillment in divergent differentiation supply chains , 1999 .

[13]  Vladimir Zwass,et al.  Electronic Commerce: Structures and Issues , 1996, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[14]  Ananth V. Iyer,et al.  Quick Response in Manufacturer-Retailer Channels , 1997 .

[15]  R. Kalakota,et al.  Frontiers of Electronic Commerce [Book Reviews] , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology: Part C.

[16]  D. Lambert,et al.  SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 2003 .

[17]  Carl H. Marcussen,et al.  The Effects of EDI on Industrial Buyer‐Seller Relationships: A Network Perspective , 1996 .

[18]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Why information systems fail , 1975 .

[19]  J. Hammant,et al.  Information technology trends in logistics , 1995 .

[20]  Joseph C Andraski ARE YOU READY FOR EFFICIENT CONSUMER RESPONSE , 1997 .

[21]  David Sykes Planning for Excellence in Materials Handling , 1994 .

[22]  E. Ziegel A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Univariate and Multivariate Statistics , 1994 .

[23]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Modeling Supply Chain Dynamics: A Multiagent Approach , 1998 .

[24]  Tridas Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Impact of electronic data interchange technology on quality improvement and inventory reduction programs: A field study , 1992 .

[25]  R. Handfield,et al.  Supply Chain Management: Supplier Performance and Firm Performance , 1998 .

[26]  A. Lewin,et al.  Determining organizational effectiveness: another look, and an agenda for research , 1986 .

[27]  Helen L Richardson CASH IN ON EFFICIENCIES , 1997 .

[28]  Tim Underhill,et al.  Strategic Alliances: Managing the Supply Chain , 1996 .

[29]  Jay U. Sterling,et al.  Long‐term Channel Member Relationships , 1989 .

[30]  Nevem Performance indicators in logistics , 1989 .

[31]  R. Engleman,et al.  Present at the creation. , 1975, Group practice.

[32]  C. Poirier,et al.  Supply Chain Optimization: Building the Strongest Total Business Network , 1996 .

[33]  Andrew Whinston,et al.  Frontiers of Electronic Commerce , 1996 .

[34]  George M. Kasper,et al.  A laboratory study of user characteristics and decision-making performance in end-user computing , 1985, Inf. Manag..

[35]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange , 1995, MIS Q..

[36]  Francis J Quinn,et al.  TEAM UP FOR SUPPLY-CHAIN SUCCESS , 1997 .

[37]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Electronic commerce: Building blocks of new business opportunity , 1996, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[38]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Causal Linkages in Supply Chain Management: An Exploratory Study of North American Manufacturing Firms , 1998 .

[39]  Garland Chow,et al.  Logistics Performance: Definition and Measurement , 1994 .

[40]  Marion G. Sobol,et al.  The relationship between computerization and performance: A strategy for maximizing the economic benefits of computerization , 1983, Inf. Manag..

[41]  Rolf T. Wigand,et al.  Electronic Commerce: Definition, Theory, and Context , 1997, Inf. Soc..

[42]  Albert S. Dexter,et al.  Added Value and Pricing with Information Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[43]  William H. DeLone Determinants of Success for Computer Usage in Small Business , 1988, MIS Q..

[44]  Tom Andel FORGE A NEW ROLE IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN , 1996 .