Log-likelihood score level fusion for improved cross-sensor smartphone periocular recognition

The proliferation of cameras and personal devices results in a wide variability of imaging conditions, producing large intra-class variations and a significant performance drop when images from heterogeneous environments are compared. However, many applications require to deal with data from different sources regularly, thus needing to overcome these interoperability problems. Here, we employ fusion of several comparators to improve periocular performance when images from different smartphones are compared. We use a probabilistic fusion framework based on linear logistic regression, in which fused scores tend to be log-likelihood ratios, obtaining a reduction in cross-sensor EER of up to 40% due to the fusion. Our framework also provides an elegant and simple solution to handle signals from different devices, since same-sensor and cross-sensor score distributions are aligned and mapped to a common probabilistic domain. This allows the use of Bayes thresholds for optimal decision making, eliminating the need of sensor-specific thresholds, which is essential in operational conditions because the threshold setting critically determines the accuracy of the authentication process in many applications.

[1]  Fernando Alonso-Fernandez,et al.  Comparison and fusion of multiple iris and periocular matchers using near-infrared and visible images , 2015, 3rd International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF 2015).

[2]  Arun Ross,et al.  Matching face against iris images using periocular information , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[3]  Fernando Alonso-Fernandez,et al.  A survey on periocular biometrics research , 2016, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[4]  Hugo Proença,et al.  Periocular recognition: Analysis of performance degradation factors , 2012, 2012 5th IAPR International Conference on Biometrics (ICB).

[5]  Julian Fiérrez,et al.  Quality-Based Conditional Processing in Multi-Biometrics: Application to Sensor Interoperability , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[6]  Fernando Alonso-Fernandez,et al.  Compact multi-scale periocular recognition using SAFE features , 2016, 2016 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR).

[7]  Kiran B. Raja,et al.  Smartphone based visible iris recognition using deep sparse filtering , 2015, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[8]  Fernando Alonso-Fernandez,et al.  Near-infrared and visible-light periocular recognition with Gabor features using frequency-adaptive automatic eye detection , 2015, IET Biom..

[9]  Gil Melfe Mateus Santos,et al.  Fusing iris and periocular information for cross-sensor recognition , 2015, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[10]  Paul S. Heckbert,et al.  Graphics gems IV , 1994 .

[11]  Javier Ortega-Garcia,et al.  Iris recognition based on SIFT features , 2004, 2009 First IEEE International Conference on Biometrics, Identity and Security (BIdS).

[12]  Karel J. Zuiderveld,et al.  Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization , 1994, Graphics Gems.

[13]  Richa Singh,et al.  Ocular biometrics: A survey of modalities and fusion approaches , 2015, Inf. Fusion.

[14]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[15]  Bill Triggs,et al.  Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[16]  G LoweDavid,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004 .

[17]  Arun Ross,et al.  Score normalization in multimodal biometric systems , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[18]  Arun Ross,et al.  50 years of biometric research: Accomplishments, challenges, and opportunities , 2016, Pattern Recognit. Lett..