The flight path of the phoenix V The visible trace of invisible elements in human vision Laboratory of Psychophysics

How features are attributed to objects is one of themost puzzling issues in the neurosciences. A deeply entrenched view is that features are perceived at the locations where they are presented. Here, we show that features in motion displays can be systematically attributed from one location to another although the elements possessing the features are invisible. Furthermore, features can be integrated across locations. Feature mislocalizations are usually treated as errors and limits of the visual system. On the contrary, we show that the nonretinotopic feature attributions, reported herein, follow rules of grouping precisely suggesting that they reflect a fundamental computational strategy and not errors of visual processing.

[1]  Saumil S. Patel,et al.  Color and motion: which is the tortoise and which is the hare? , 2003, Vision Research.

[2]  David C Burr,et al.  Feature-based integration of orientation signals in visual search , 2000, Vision Research.

[3]  J. Enns.  Visual binding in the standing wave illusion , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Perceptual organization in moving patterns , 1983, Nature.

[5]  Haluk Öğmen,et al.  Perceptual grouping induces non-retinotopic feature attribution in human vision , 2006, Vision Research.

[6]  Michael H. Herzog,et al.  Attention and feature integration in the feature inheritance effect , 2005, Vision Research.

[7]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  D. Hofer,et al.  Metakontrast: ein berühmtes, aber schwer messbares Phänomen , 1989 .

[9]  Jean Lorenceau,et al.  Form constraints in motion binding , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[11]  T. Poggio,et al.  Visual hyperacuity: spatiotemporal interpolation in human vision , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[12]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Unconscious Masked Priming Depends on Temporal Attention , 2002, Psychological science.

[13]  B L Anderson,et al.  Reciprocal interactions between occlusion and motion computations. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  A. Wilson,et al.  Transposition in backward masking the case of the travelling gap , 1985, Vision Research.

[15]  J. Lund,et al.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  P. E. Hallett,et al.  Retinal eccentricity and the latency of eye saccades , 1994, Vision Research.

[17]  A. Stoper,et al.  Relation of split apparent motion to metacontrast. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Aijaz A. Baloch,et al.  A neural model of high-level motion processing: Line motion and formotion dynamics , 1997, Vision Research.

[19]  D. Burr.  Acuity for apparent vernier offset , 1979, Vision Research.

[20]  C Koch,et al.  Seeing properties of an invisible object: Feature inheritance and shine-through , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Hans Wallach.  Über visuell wahrgenommene Bewegungsrichtung , 1935 .

[22]  Robert Stigler,et al.  Chronophotische Studien über den Umgebungskontrast , 1910, Pflüger's Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere.

[23]  D. Mewhort,et al.  When do letter features migrate? A boundary condition for feature-integration theory , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  V. Lollo,et al.  Practice reduces suppression in metacontrast and in apparent motion , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  Asynchronous processing in vision Color leads motion , 2001, Current Biology.

[26]  D Wyman,et al.  Letter: Latency characteristics of small saccades. , 1973, Vision research.

[27]  Dean G. Purcell,et al.  U-shaped masking functions in visual backward masking: Effects of target configuration and retinal position , 1970 .

[28]  M. Bach,et al.  The Freiburg Visual Acuity test--automatic measurement of visual acuity. , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[29]  Lamme Vaf,et al.  Why visual attention and awareness are different , 2003 .

[30]  S Zeki,et al.  Localization and globalization in conscious vision. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[31]  M. Morgan.  Pulfrich Effect and the Filling in of Apparent Motion , 1976, Perception.

[32]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Attentional Modulation of Unconscious Automatic Processes: Evidence from Event-related Potentials in a Masked Priming Paradigm , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  H. Werner.  Studies on Contour: I. Qualitative Analyses , 1935 .

[34]  P. A. Kolers.  Aspects of motion perception , 1972 .

[35]  R. Nijhawan,et al.  Visual decomposition of colour through motion extrapolation , 1997, Nature.