Force coordination strategies in on‐water single sculling: Are asymmetries related to better rowing performance?

Asymmetries of the rowing stroke cycle have been assessed with reference to kinematics and foot‐force measures in laboratory testing environments. It remains unclear how asymmetries in propulsive kinetic measures are related to on‐water rowing performance. A new approach for the evaluation of both global and local asymmetries across the entire movement was used to assess the continuous role of asymmetries and whether these change according to the level of competitive representation. Twenty‐seven highly skilled female rowers (national and international competition level), rowing at 32 strokes per minute in a single scull boat, were evaluated. A symmetry index (SI) and functional data analysis (FDA) techniques were applied to a continuous difference time‐series, which described fluctuating asymmetry in propulsive pin forces for each rower. Univariate ANOVAs revealed that differences in asymmetries were present as a factor of competition level for the SI and results of FDA. International athletes were more likely to utilize an asymmetry strategy with increased stroke‐side (port‐side) force early in the drive phase and increased bow‐side (starboard) force through the second half of the drive. This was likely the result of international performers customizing their movement strategies relative to known boat mechanical offsets. The first half of the drive phase was also found to be an adaptive part of the rowing stroke cycle, suggesting asymmetries may have a functional role in successful execution of movements during the rowing stroke.

[1]  Philippe Gorce,et al.  Variations in expert rower coordination when rate increases on ergometer concept2® , 2008 .

[2]  L Chèze,et al.  Fixed versus free-floating stretcher mechanism in rowing ergometers: Mechanical aspects , 2006, Journal of sports sciences.

[3]  Richard M. Smith,et al.  How gender and boat-side affect shape characteristics of force-angle profiles in single sculling: Insights from functional data analysis. , 2017, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[4]  Erica Buckeridge,et al.  Kinematic asymmetries of the lower limbs during ergometer rowing. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  J. Kavanagh,et al.  Thorax and pelvis kinematics during the downswing of male and female skilled golfers. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Gareth Irwin,et al.  Inter-segmental coordination in progressions for the longswing on high bar , 2007, Sports biomechanics.

[7]  J Warmenhoven,et al.  Assessment of propulsive pin force and oar angle time‐series using functional data analysis in on‐water rowing , 2017, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[8]  Joseph Hamill,et al.  Movement coordination patterns in triple jump training drills , 2009, Journal of sports sciences.

[9]  Gareth Irwin,et al.  Coordination as a function of skill level in the gymnastics longswing , 2016, Journal of sports sciences.

[10]  J. Alderson,et al.  Intra-limb coordination in karate kicking: Effect of impacting or not impacting a target. , 2014, Human movement science.

[11]  H. Hill Dynamics of coordination within elite rowing crews: evidence from force pattern analysis , 2002, Journal of sports sciences.

[12]  K. Kulig,et al.  Intra-task variability of trunk coordination during a rate-controlled bipedal dance jump , 2012, Journal of sports sciences.

[13]  Peter J Beek,et al.  Handedness-related asymmetry in coupling strength in bimanual coordination: furthering theory and evidence. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[14]  Kieran Moran,et al.  Comparison of discrete-point vs. dimensionality-reduction techniques for describing performance-related aspects of maximal vertical jumping. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Richard M. Smith,et al.  Asymmetry in elite rowers: effect of ergometer design and stroke rate , 2015, Sports biomechanics.

[16]  A. Mcgregor,et al.  Foot force production and asymmetries in elite rowers , 2014, Sports biomechanics.

[17]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Constraints on the Development of Coordination , 1986 .

[18]  Bruce Elliott,et al.  CONTINUOUS REGISTRATION OF THE HAND-CURVE IN ROWING: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SCULL AND SWEEP ROWERS , 2004 .

[19]  Conny Draper,et al.  Over 50 Years of Researching Force Profiles in Rowing: What Do We Know? , 2018, Sports Medicine.

[20]  F Colloud,et al.  The effect of ergometer design on rowing stroke mechanics , 2013, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[21]  Hans-Georg Müller,et al.  Functional Data Analysis , 2016 .

[22]  L. S. Cuijpers,et al.  Rocking the boat: does perfect rowing crew synchronization reduce detrimental boat movements? , 2017, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[23]  J. Crandall,et al.  The mechanical interactions between an American football cleat and playing surfaces in-situ at loads and rates generated by elite athletes: a comparison of playing surfaces , 2015, Sports biomechanics.

[24]  Bruce Elliott,et al.  The RowPerfect ergometer: a training aid for on-water single scull rowing. , 2002, Sports biomechanics.

[25]  Noel E. O’Connor,et al.  Analysis of characterizing phases on waveform: an application to vertical jumps. , 2014, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[26]  Arnold Baca,et al.  COMPARISON OF FOOT-STRETCHER FORCE PROFILES BETWEEN ON- WATER AND ERGOMETER ROWING , 2007 .

[27]  A. Wing,et al.  The coordination and consistency of rowers in a racing eight. , 1995, Journal of sports sciences.

[28]  Constanze Loschner,et al.  Biomechanics feedback for rowing , 2002, Journal of sports sciences.

[29]  Clara Soper,et al.  Towards an Ideal Rowing Technique for Performance , 2004, Sports medicine.

[30]  Mathijs J Hofmijster,et al.  Rowing skill affects power loss on a modified rowing ergometer. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[31]  C Button,et al.  Inter-individual variability in the upper-lower limb breaststroke coordination. , 2011, Human movement science.