Discourse analysis and constructionist approaches: theoretical background

This chapter is structured in terms of questions and answers. There are several reasons for adopting this format. First, people often consult a handbook to find the answers to questions so the format may simplify this task. Second, most constructionist approaches place a considerable emphasis on dialogueand question-answer sequences are dialogue in one of its most prototypical forms. Third, constructionist researchers have been at the forefront of moves to rethink the literary forms in which social science is presented. I shall start with some general questions about constructionism and its place in psychology, and then I shall move on to focus on issues of method and analysis. I shall concentrate upon general principles and arguments, however, this is not intended to be a how-to-do-it chapter. Chapter 11, by Rosalind Gill, provides a more fleshed out example of a particular style of constructionist research.

[1]  Sean Hammond,et al.  Research Methods in Psychology , 1994 .

[2]  George Psathas,et al.  Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction , 1994 .

[3]  Tim McCreanor,et al.  Race Talk and Common Sense: Patterns in Pakeha Discourse on Maori/Pakeha Relations in New Zealand , 1991 .

[4]  E. Schegloff.  Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation , 1992, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  Derek Edwards,et al.  Language and causation : a discursive action model of description and attribution , 1993 .

[6]  G. Button.  Ethnomethodology and the human sciences: Contributors , 1991 .

[7]  J. Potter,et al.  Mapping the Language of Racism. Discourse and the Legitimation of Exploitation. (Löschper) , 1993 .

[8]  M. Billig.  The argumentative nature of holding strong views: a case study , 1989 .

[9]  Margaret Wetherell,et al.  Accomplishing attitudes: Fact and evaluation in racist discourse , 1988 .

[10]  J. Hewitt.  Self and Society: A Symbolic Interactionist Social Psychology , 1976 .

[11]  R. Gephart.  Ethnostatistics: Qualitative Foundations for Quantitative Research , 1988 .

[12]  M. Billig.  Talking Of The Royal Family , 1991 .

[13]  B. Latour.  Science in Action , 1987 .

[14]  G. Psathas,et al.  The ’practices’ of transcription in conversation analysis , 1990 .

[15]  John Heritage,et al.  Generating Applause: A Study of Rhetoric and Response at Party Political Conferences , 1986, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[17]  K. Gergen.  THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONIST MOVEMENT IN MODERN PSYCHOLOGY , 1985 .

[18]  J. Clifford,et al.  Writing culture : the poetics and politics of ethnography : a School of American Research advanced seminar , 1986 .

[19]  Wendy Hollway,et al.  Subjectivity and Method in Psychology: Gender, Meaning and Science , 1989 .

[20]  M. Mulkay.  Science and the sociology of knowledge , 1979 .

[21]  D. Edwards.  Discourse and cognition , 1996 .

[22]  Henderikus J. Stam,et al.  Power/gender : social relations in theory and practice , 1994 .

[23]  Anita M. Pomerantz.  Mental concepts in the analysis of social action , 1990 .

[24]  J. Potter,et al.  Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour , 1987 .

[25]  E. Mishler.  Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative , 1986 .

[26]  S. Reicher,et al.  Discourses of community and conflict: The organization of social categories in accounts of a ‘riot’ , 1987 .

[27]  Margaret Wetherell,et al.  Unequal egalitarianism: A preliminary study of discourses concerning gender and employment opportunities , 1987 .

[28]  Derek Edwards,et al.  Discourse: Noun, Verb or Social Practice? , 1990 .

[29]  J. Atkinson,et al.  Our masters' voices: The language and body language of politics , 1984 .

[30]  Michael Billig,et al.  Prejudice, categorization and particularization: from a perceptual to a rhetorical approach , 1985 .

[31]  D. Edwards.  Two to Tango: Script Formulations, Dispositions, and Rhetorical Symmetry in Relationship Troubles Talk , 1995 .

[32]  Michael Billig,et al.  Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology , 1987 .

[33]  Ch. Perelman.  The New Rhetoric , 1957 .

[34]  John I. Kitsuse,et al.  Constructing the social , 1994 .

[35]  Rom Harré,et al.  Personal Being: A Theory for Individual Psychology , 1984 .

[36]  Michael Billig,et al.  Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking , 1988 .

[37]  M. Billig.  Rhetorical and historical aspects of attitudes: The case of the British monarchy , 1988 .

[38]  J. Wertsch.  Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action , 1992 .

[39]  J. Bowers.  Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour , 1988 .

[40]  Robin Wooffitt.  Chapter 1 – On the Analysis of Interaction: An Introduction to Conversation Analysis , 1990 .

[41]  Andrew Chitty,et al.  Quantification Rhetoric—cancer on Television , 1991 .

[42]  J. Potter.  Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction , 1996 .

[43]  R. Harré,et al.  Social Being: A Theory for Social Psychology , 1980 .

[44]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts , 1983 .

[45]  M. Mulkay,et al.  Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse , 1984 .

[46]  Jeff Coulter,et al.  Mind in Action , 1989 .

[47]  Kenneth J. Gergen,et al.  Realities and Relationships: Soundings in Social Construction , 1994 .

[48]  Don H. Zimmerman,et al.  Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences , 1994 .

[49]  E. B. Zechmeister,et al.  Research Methods in Psychology. , 1990 .

[50]  E. Schegloff.  Reflections on Quantification in the Study of Conversation , 1993 .