Learning outcomes in medical informatics: Comparison of a WebCT course with ordinary web site learning material

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to compare whether students' learning outcomes would be better in a designed learning environment (WebCT) than in a conventional web site (WWW) with similar course material but without special learning tools. CONTEXT Third-year medical students in an introductory course on medical informatics at the University of Helsinki, Finland. METHODS Students were randomly assigned to a WebCT group (n=39) and a WWW group (n=46). The students in the WebCT group utilized the course material in general discussion groups, special discussions about lectures, quizzes and students' own notes. The WWW group had access only to the course material. The learning outcome was assessed by administering an on-line examination and the learning experience of the students was assessed by an on-line quiz. RESULTS The course grade was significantly higher in the WebCT group as compared to the WWW group. This finding was more prominent among females. The students of the WebCT group also experienced significantly more improvement in collaboration with the use of computers than the students in the WWW group. CONCLUSIONS Based on our results, web-based learning seems to be more effective when students are provided with specially designed learning tools.

[1]  Heidi S Chumley-Jones,et al.  Web‐based Learning: Sound Educational Method or Hype? A Review of the Evaluation Literature , 2002, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[2]  Anita Burgun-Parenthoine,et al.  Collaborative environment for clinical reasoning and distance learning sessions , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[3]  J. Hudson.  Computer‐aided learning in the real world of medical education: does the quality of interaction with the computer affect student learning? , 2004, Medical education.

[4]  B. Wilson.  Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design , 1995 .

[5]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Learning Networks: A Field Guide to Teaching and Learning Online , 1995 .

[6]  I. Jung,et al.  Effects of Different Types of Interaction on Learning Achievement, Satisfaction and Participation in Web-Based Instruction , 2002 .

[7]  David A. Stevens,et al.  The Online Learning Handbook: Developing and Using Web-based Learning , 2001 .

[8]  T Le,et al.  MSJAMA: medical education and the Internet: this changes everything. , 2001, JAMA.

[9]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Constructivism: Implications for the Design and Delivery of Instruction , 1996 .

[10]  Gerard S Letterie,et al.  Medical education as a science: the quality of evidence for computer-assisted instruction. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking , 1999 .

[12]  Christine Williams.  Learning On-line: A review of recent literature in a rapidly expanding field , 2002 .

[13]  Jarmo Levonen.  Verkkopohjaisten oppimisympäristöjen teoriaa ja käytäntöä , 2000 .

[14]  Mohamed Khalifa,et al.  Web-based learning: effects on learning process and outcome , 2002, IEEE Trans. Educ..