Model quality objectives based on measurement uncertainty. Part II: NO2 and PM10

Abstract Estimating measurement uncertainty for NO2 and PM10 is a complex issue that is normally addressed by experimentalists specifically for every type of instrument and measurement. On the other hand, an estimate of the maximum expected measurement uncertainty is needed when a numerical model is to be evaluated against observations, as proposed in Thunis et al. (2012 , referred to as T2012). In a companion paper ( Thunis et al., 2013 , referred to as T2013) a simplified formulation of the measurement uncertainty in function of the measured concentration is proposed and applied to the simpler case of Ozone. In this paper the same approach is applied for NO2 and PM10, but using different techniques for the uncertainty estimation. For NO2 the Guide to the expression of Uncertainty in Measurement JCGM (2008, referred to as GUM) approach is used and applied on each urban AirBase (1997) measurement over the year 2009. For PM10, the method of the Guide for the Demonstration of Equivalence ( ECWG, 2010 ) is used on data obtained with two different PM samplers used in parallel either during specific monitoring campaign or as available within the AirBase database. The resulting concentration dependent measurement uncertainties are then used to update the MQO (Model Quality Objective) and MPC (Model Performance Criteria) proposed in T2012. An estimate of the measurement uncertainty for annual means is proposed as well.

[1]  Marco Dell'Isola,et al.  Critical aspects of the uncertainty budget in the gravimetric PM measurements , 2011 .

[2]  Mar Viana,et al.  Influence of Sampling Artefacts on Measured PM, OC, and EC Levels in Carbonaceous Aerosols in an Urban Area , 2006 .

[3]  Timo Mäkelä,et al.  Intercomparison of methods to measure the mass concentration of the atmospheric aerosol during INTERCOMP2000: influence of instrumentation and size cuts , 2004 .

[4]  Michael Schulz,et al.  Artefacts in the sampling of nitrate studied in the INTERCOMP campaigns of EUROTRAC-AEROSOL , 2004 .

[5]  Paul Quincey,et al.  Studies of the effect of humidity and other factors on some different filter materials used for gravimetric measurements of ambient particulate matter , 2006 .

[6]  Lagler Friedrich,et al.  A Quality Assurance and Control Program for PM2.5 and PM10 measurements in European Air Quality Monitoring Networks , 2011 .

[7]  A. Zięba,et al.  Effective Number of Observations and Unbiased Estimators of Variance for Autocorrelated Data - an Overview , 2010 .

[8]  Michel Gerboles,et al.  Model quality objectives based on measurement uncertainty. Part I: Ozone , 2013 .

[9]  W. Maenhaut,et al.  Sampling artefacts, concentration and chemical composition of fine water-soluble organic carbon and humic-like substances in a continental urban atmospheric environment , 2007 .

[10]  A. Zięba,et al.  Standard Deviation of the Mean of Autocorrelated Observations Estimated with the Use of the Autocorrelation Function Estimated From the Data , 2011 .

[11]  Anna Pederzoli,et al.  Performance criteria to evaluate air quality modeling applications , 2012 .

[12]  Paola Fermo,et al.  Organic and inorganic sampling artefacts assessment , 2009 .

[13]  Michel Gerboles,et al.  Assessment of uncertainty of NO2 measurements by the chemiluminescence method and discussion of the quality objective of the NO2 European Directive. , 2003, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.