Accuracy of claim data in the identification and classification of adults with congenital heart diseases in electronic medical records.

BACKGROUND The content of electronic medical records (EMRs) encompasses both structured data, such as billing codes, and unstructured data, including free-text reports. Epidemiological and clinical research into adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) increasingly relies on administrative claim data using the International Classification of Diseases (9th revision) (ICD-9). In France, administrative databases use ICD-10, the reliability of which is largely unknown in this context. AIMS To assess the accuracy of ICD-10 codes retrieved from administrative claim data in the identification and classification of ACHD. METHODS We randomly included 6000 patients hospitalized at least once in 2000-2014 in a cardiology department with a dedicated specialized ACHD Unit. For each patient, the clinical diagnosis extracted from the EMR was compared with the assigned ICD-10 codes. Performance of ICD-10 codes in the identification and classification of ACHD was assessed by estimating sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value. RESULTS Among the 6000 patients included, 780 (13%) patients with ACHD were manually identified from EMRs (107,092 documents). ICD-10 codes correctly categorized 629 as having ACHD (sensitivity 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.78-0.83), with a specificity of 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.99-1). The performance of ICD-10 codes in correctly categorizing the ACHD defect subtype depended on the defect, with sensitivity ranging from 0 (e.g. unspecified congenital malformation of tricuspid valve) to 1 (e.g. common arterial trunk), and specificity ranging from 0.99 to 1. CONCLUSIONS Administrative data using ICD-10 codes is a precise tool for detecting ACHD, and may be used to establish a national cohort. Mining free-text reports in addition to coded administrative data may offset the lack of sensitivity and accuracy when describing the spectrum of congenital heart disease using ICD-10 codes.

[1]  Anita Burgun-Parenthoine,et al.  Reviewing 741 patients records in two hours with FASTVISU , 2015, AMIA.

[2]  Joseph D. Kay,et al.  Multicenter research in adult congenital heart disease. , 2008, International journal of cardiology.

[3]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010). , 2010, European heart journal.

[4]  N. Mendelsohn,et al.  Validity of Hospital Discharge Data for Identifying Infants with Cardiac Defects , 2005, Journal of Perinatology.

[5]  Nandini Dendukuri,et al.  Lifetime Prevalence of Congenital Heart Disease in the General Population From 2000 to 2010 , 2014, Circulation.

[6]  A. Marelli,et al.  Congenital Heart Disease in the General Population: Changing Prevalence and Age Distribution , 2006, Circulation.

[7]  Tracy A. Lieu,et al.  The Cardiovascular Research Network: A New Paradigm for Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes Research , 2008, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[8]  Christopher G. Chute,et al.  Semantic Alignment between ICD-11 and SNOMED CT , 2015, MedInfo.

[9]  F. Alla,et al.  Comparison of the Short-Term Risk of Bleeding and Arterial Thromboembolic Events in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Newly Treated With Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban Versus Vitamin K Antagonists , 2015, Circulation.

[10]  C. Broberg,et al.  Feasibility of Using Electronic Medical Record Data for Tracking Quality Indicators in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease. , 2015, Congenital heart disease.

[11]  E. Novak,et al.  Clinical predictors of length of stay in adults with congenital heart disease , 2017, Heart.

[12]  Anke Neumann,et al.  Benfluorex and valvular heart disease: a cohort study of a million people with diabetes mellitus , 2010, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[13]  Louise Pilote,et al.  Atrial Arrhythmias in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease , 2009, Circulation.

[14]  A. Marelli,et al.  Building quality indicators to improve care for adults with congenital heart disease. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  Robert H. Anderson,et al.  Population-based evaluation of a suggested anatomic and clinical classification of congenital heart defects based on the International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code , 2011, Orphanet journal of rare diseases.

[16]  Shuying Shen,et al.  Automated extraction of ejection fraction for quality measurement using regular expressions in Unstructured Information Management Architecture (UIMA) for heart failure , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[17]  Bastien Rance,et al.  A novel data-driven workflow combining literature and electronic health records to estimate comorbidities burden for a specific disease: a case study on autoimmune comorbidities in patients with celiac disease , 2017, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[18]  A. Schott,et al.  Is it possible to estimate the incidence of breast cancer from medico-administrative databases? , 2008, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[19]  P. Khairy Looking ahead: clinical trial design in adult congenital heart disease. , 2012, Future cardiology.

[20]  C. Broberg,et al.  Limited Accuracy of Administrative Data for the Identification and Classification of Adult Congenital Heart Disease , 2018, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[21]  Patrice Degoulet,et al.  The Georges Pompidou University Hospital Clinical Data Warehouse: A 8-years follow-up experience , 2017, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[22]  Stephen B. Johnson,et al.  A review of approaches to identifying patient phenotype cohorts using electronic health records , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[23]  C. Cronk,et al.  Completeness of state administrative databases for surveillance of congenital heart disease. , 2003, Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology.

[24]  Ihssen Belhadj,et al.  Data Resource Profile: The French National Uniform Hospital Discharge Data Set Database (PMSI). , 2017, International journal of epidemiology.

[25]  Griffin M. Weber,et al.  Serving the enterprise and beyond with informatics for integrating biology and the bedside (i2b2) , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[26]  Steven H. Brown,et al.  Automated identification of postoperative complications within an electronic medical record using natural language processing. , 2011, JAMA.

[27]  C. Mavroudis,et al.  Congenital Heart Surgery Nomenclature and Database Project: overview and minimum dataset. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[28]  J. Roos‐Hesselink,et al.  Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  Joshua C. Denny,et al.  Combining billing codes, clinical notes, and medications from electronic health records provides superior phenotyping performance , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[30]  Patrice Degoulet,et al.  Methodology of integration of a clinical data warehouse with a clinical information system: the HEGP case , 2010, MedInfo.

[31]  M. Abrahamowicz,et al.  Changing mortality in congenital heart disease. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  Joshua C Denny,et al.  Evaluating electronic health record data sources and algorithmic approaches to identify hypertensive individuals , 2017, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[33]  Louise Pilote,et al.  Health care resource utilization in adults with congenital heart disease. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[34]  Graham Rush,et al.  Databases for Congenital Heart Defect Public Health Studies Across the Lifespan , 2016, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[35]  A. Marelli,et al.  Long-term outcomes after surgical versus transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects in adults. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[36]  Keith Marsolo,et al.  PEDSnet: a National Pediatric Learning Health System , 2014, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[37]  J. Brophy,et al.  Stroke in Adults With Congenital Heart DiseaseCLINICAL PERSPECTIVE , 2015 .

[38]  A. Opotowsky,et al.  Trends in hospitalizations for adults with congenital heart disease in the U.S. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[39]  W. Chung,et al.  Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group: An Integrated Network for Congenital Heart Disease Research , 2016, Circulation.

[40]  Adam Wright,et al.  Early results of the meaningful use program for electronic health records. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  S. D. de Ferranti,et al.  The Changing Demographics of Congenital Heart Disease Hospitalizations in the United States, 1998 Through 2010. , 2013, JAMA.

[42]  Tong Li,et al.  Electronic health record phenotyping improves detection and screening of type 2 diabetes in the general United States population: A cross-sectional, unselected, retrospective study , 2015, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[43]  Robert H. Anderson,et al.  Nomenclature for congenital and paediatric cardiac disease: Historical perspectives and The International Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code , 2008, Cardiology in the Young.

[44]  R. Califf,et al.  Emerging Research Directions in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: A Report From an NHLBI/ACHA Working Group. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.