Quality assessment of speckle patterns for DIC by consideration of both systematic errors and random errors

Abstract The performance of digital image correlation (DIC) is influenced by the quality of speckle patterns significantly. Thus, it is crucial to present a valid and practical method to assess the quality of speckle patterns. However, existing assessment methods either lack a solid theoretical foundation or fail to consider the errors due to interpolation. In this work, it is proposed to assess the quality of speckle patterns by estimating the root mean square error (RMSE) of DIC, which is the square root of the sum of square of systematic error and random error. Two performance evaluation parameters, respectively the maximum and the quadratic mean of RMSE, are proposed to characterize the total error. An efficient algorithm is developed to estimate these parameters, and the correctness of this algorithm is verified by numerical experiments for both 1 dimensional signal and actual speckle images. The influences of correlation criterion, shape function order, and sub-pixel registration algorithm are briefly discussed. Compared to existing methods, method presented by this paper is more valid due to the consideration of both measurement accuracy and precision.

[1]  Hugh Alan Bruck,et al.  Digital image correlation using Newton-Raphson method of partial differential correction , 1989 .

[2]  Luigi Bruno,et al.  Stress distribution retrieval in granular materials: A multi-scale model and digital image correlation measurements , 2016 .

[3]  Dongsheng Zhang,et al.  Real-Time Digital Image Correlation for Dynamic Strain Measurement , 2016 .

[4]  S. Thuillier,et al.  Potential of the Cross Biaxial Test for Anisotropy Characterization Based on Heterogeneous Strain Field , 2015 .

[5]  H. Haddadi,et al.  Use of rigid-body motion for the investigation and estimation of the measurement errors related to digital image correlation technique , 2008 .

[6]  Stephen Boyd,et al.  Speckle pattern quality assessment for digital image correlation , 2013 .

[7]  Jinlong Chen,et al.  Deformation measurement across crack using two-step extended digital image correlation method , 2010 .

[8]  MatthewsIain,et al.  Lucas-Kanade 20 Years On , 2004 .

[9]  Huimin Xie,et al.  Mean intensity gradient: An effective global parameter for quality assessment of the speckle patterns used in digital image correlation , 2010 .

[10]  Zongxi Cai,et al.  An experimental investigation on the damage of granite under uniaxial tension by using a digital image correlation method , 2015 .

[11]  M. Unser,et al.  Interpolation Revisited , 2000, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[12]  Stéphane Roux,et al.  Digital Image Correlation , 2012 .

[13]  Jun Ma,et al.  Accuracy enhancement of digital image correlation with B-spline interpolation. , 2011, Optics letters.

[14]  M. A. Sutton,et al.  Systematic errors in digital image correlation caused by intensity interpolation , 2000 .

[15]  Peng Zhou,et al.  Subpixel displacement and deformation gradient measurement using digital image/speckle correlation (DISC) , 2001 .

[16]  Simon Baker,et al.  Lucas-Kanade 20 Years On: A Unifying Framework , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[17]  M. Bonnet,et al.  Overview of Identification Methods of Mechanical Parameters Based on Full-field Measurements , 2008 .

[18]  Fabio Matta,et al.  Thermo-Mechanical Toner Transfer for High-Quality Digital Image Correlation Speckle Patterns , 2015 .

[19]  Bing Pan,et al.  Comparison of subset-based local and FE-based global digital image correlation: Theoretical error analysis and validation , 2016 .

[20]  Nasser Soltani,et al.  On the mode I fracture analysis of cracked Brazilian disc using a digital image correlation method , 2016 .

[21]  Shaopeng Ma,et al.  Mesh-based digital image correlation method using higher order isoparametric elements , 2012 .

[22]  Hugh Alan Bruck,et al.  Full-field representation of discretely sampled surface deformation for displacement and strain analysis , 1991 .

[23]  J. Tong,et al.  Statistical Analysis of the Effect of Intensity Pattern Noise on the Displacement Measurement Precision of Digital Image Correlation Using Self-correlated Images , 2007 .

[24]  Jean-José Orteu,et al.  Assessment of Digital Image Correlation Measurement Accuracy in the Ultimate Error Regime: Main Results of a Collaborative Benchmark , 2013 .

[25]  Pengwan Chen,et al.  Evaluation of the quality of a speckle pattern in the digital image correlation method by mean subset fluctuation , 2011 .

[26]  Qingchuan Zhang,et al.  Effects of Various Shape Functions and Subset Size in Local Deformation Measurements Using DIC , 2015 .

[27]  Bing Pan,et al.  Some practical considerations in finite element-based digital image correlation , 2015 .

[28]  Zhaoyang Wang,et al.  Equivalence of digital image correlation criteria for pattern matching. , 2010, Applied optics.

[29]  M. Sutton,et al.  Gaussian Pre-Filtering for Uncertainty Minimization in Digital Image Correlation Using Numerically-Designed Speckle Patterns , 2015 .

[30]  Xiaoping Wu,et al.  Fourier-based interpolation bias prediction in digital image correlation. , 2015, Optics express.

[31]  H. Lu,et al.  Deformation measurements by digital image correlation: Implementation of a second-order displacement gradient , 2000 .

[32]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Fundamental performance limits in image registration , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[33]  Ran Tao,et al.  Accurate kinematic measurement at interfaces between dissimilar materials using conforming finite-element-based digital image correlation , 2016 .

[34]  Xiaoyuan He,et al.  Noise robustness and parallel computation of the inverse compositional Gauss-Newton algorithm in digital image correlation , 2015 .

[35]  Hubert W. Schreier,et al.  Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements: Basic Concepts,Theory and Applications , 2009 .

[36]  Hugh Alan Bruck,et al.  Quantitative Error Assessment in Pattern Matching: Effects of Intensity Pattern Noise, Interpolation, Strain and Image Contrast on Motion Measurements , 2009 .

[37]  M. Sutton,et al.  Effects of subpixel image restoration on digital correlation error estimates , 1988 .

[38]  S. Roux,et al.  “Finite-Element” Displacement Fields Analysis from Digital Images: Application to Portevin–Le Châtelier Bands , 2006 .

[39]  Zhang Yong,et al.  High-efficiency and high-accuracy digital image correlation for three-dimensional measurement , 2015 .

[40]  Qingchuan Zhang,et al.  Investigation of Portevin-Le Chatelier effect in 5456 Al-based alloy using digital image correlation , 2015 .

[41]  Haiting Xia,et al.  Application of the mean intensity of the second derivative in evaluating the speckle patterns in digital image correlation , 2014 .

[42]  Michael Unser,et al.  Convolution-based interpolation for fast, high-quality rotation of images , 1995, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[43]  S. Roux,et al.  Comparison of Local and Global Approaches to Digital Image Correlation , 2012 .

[44]  Stéphane Roux,et al.  Shear-band capturing using a multiscale extended digital image correlation technique , 2007 .

[45]  Bing Pan,et al.  Bias error reduction of digital image correlation using Gaussian pre-filtering , 2013 .

[46]  Simon Baker,et al.  Equivalence and efficiency of image alignment algorithms , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[47]  Anand Asundi,et al.  Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review , 2009 .

[48]  Sven Bossuyt,et al.  Quality assessment of speckle patterns for digital image correlation , 2006 .

[49]  S. Choi,et al.  Measurement of deformations on concrete subjected to compression using image correlation , 1997 .

[50]  C. Quan,et al.  A method to transfer speckle patterns for digital image correlation , 2015 .

[51]  M. Unser,et al.  Interpolation revisited [medical images application] , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[52]  G. Vendroux,et al.  Submicron deformation field measurements: Part 2. Improved digital image correlation , 1998 .

[53]  Xiaoyuan He,et al.  Real-time 3D digital image correlation method and its application in human pulse monitoring. , 2016, Applied optics.

[54]  Qingchuan Zhang,et al.  Noise-induced bias for convolution-based interpolation in digital image correlation. , 2016, Optics express.

[55]  Yaofeng Sun,et al.  Finite element formulation for a digital image correlation method. , 2005, Applied optics.

[56]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Ziv–Zakai Bounds on Image Registration , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[57]  Antonio Baldi,et al.  Experimental Analysis of the Errors due to Polynomial Interpolation in Digital Image Correlation , 2015 .

[58]  Frédéric Sur,et al.  Effect of interpolation on noise propagation from images to DIC displacement maps , 2016 .

[59]  Imam Samil Yetik,et al.  Performance bounds on image registration , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[60]  Qingchuan Zhang,et al.  On the propagation and pulsation of Portevin-Le Chatelier deformation bands: An experimental study with digital speckle pattern metrology , 2005 .

[61]  Justin A. Blaber,et al.  Ncorr: Open-Source 2D Digital Image Correlation Matlab Software , 2015, Experimental Mechanics.

[62]  M. Sutton,et al.  Systematic errors in digital image correlation due to undermatched subset shape functions , 2002 .

[63]  M. Grédiac,et al.  Assessment of Digital Image Correlation Measurement Errors: Methodology and Results , 2009 .

[64]  Stéphane Roux,et al.  Mechanical assistance to DIC , 2012 .

[65]  Bing Pan,et al.  Comparison of Subset-Based Local and Finite Element-Based Global Digital Image Correlation , 2015 .

[66]  W. Peters,et al.  Digital Imaging Techniques In Experimental Stress Analysis , 1982 .

[67]  Franccois Hild,et al.  Digital Image Correlation: from Displacement Measurement to Identification of Elastic Properties – a Review , 2006 .

[68]  Jubing Chen,et al.  Image pre-filtering for measurement error reduction in digital image correlation , 2015 .

[69]  I. Yamaguchi,et al.  A laser-speckle strain gauge , 1981 .

[70]  Long Tian,et al.  Superfast robust digital image correlation analysis with parallel computing , 2015 .

[71]  Zhenyu Jiang,et al.  Path-independent digital image correlation with high accuracy, speed and robustness , 2015 .

[72]  Yong Su,et al.  Experimental analysis of image noise and interpolation bias in digital image correlation , 2016 .

[73]  K. Qian,et al.  Study on subset size selection in digital image correlation for speckle patterns. , 2008, Optics express.

[74]  W. F. Ranson,et al.  Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics , 1985 .

[75]  Bing Pan,et al.  Random Errors in Digital Image Correlation Due to Matched or Overmatched Shape Functions , 2015 .

[76]  Sun Yaofeng,et al.  Study of optimal subset size in digital image correlation of speckle pattern images , 2007 .

[77]  Olivier Dalverny,et al.  Study of image characteristics on digital image correlation error assessment , 2010 .

[78]  Mgd Marc Geers,et al.  Interface debonding characterization by image correlation integrated with Double Cantilever Beam kinematics , 2015 .

[79]  Wei Tong,et al.  Fast, Robust and Accurate Digital Image Correlation Calculation Without Redundant Computations , 2013, Experimental Mechanics.

[80]  Dimitri Debruyne,et al.  Theoretical Analysis on the Measurement Errors of Local 2D DIC: Part I Temporal and Spatial Uncertainty Quantification of Displacement Measurements , 2014 .

[81]  G. Paulino,et al.  Direct Extraction of Cohesive Fracture Properties from Digital Image Correlation: A Hybrid Inverse Technique , 2011 .