Patient-specific spine models. Part 1: Finite element analysis of the lumbar intervertebral disc—a material sensitivity study

Abstract If patient-specific finite element models of the spine could be developed, they would offer enormous opportunities in the diagnosis and management of back problems. Several generic models have been developed in the past, but there has been very little detailed examination of the sensitivity of these models' characteristics to the input parameters. This relationship must be thoroughly understood if representative patient-specific models are to be realized and used with confidence. In particular, the performance of the intervertebral discs are central to any spine model and need detailed investigation first. A generic non-linear model of an intervertebral disc was developed and subjected to compressive, flexion and torsional loading regimes. The effects of both material and geometric non-linearities were investigated for the three loading schemes and the results compared with experimental data. The basic material properties of the fibres, annulus and nucleus were then varied and the effects on the stiffness, annulus bulge and annulus stresses analysed. The results showed that the non-linear geometry assumption had a significant effect on the compression characteristics, whereas the non-linear material option did not. In contrast, the material non-linearity was more important for the flexural and torsional loading schemes. Thus, the inclusion of non-linear material and geometry analysis options in finite element models of intervertebral discs is necessary to predict in vivo load-deflection characteristics accurately. When the influence of the material properties was examined in detail, it was found that the fibre properties did not have a significant effect on the compressive stiffness of the disc but did affect the flexural and torsional stiffnesses by up to ±20 per cent. All loading modes were sensitive to the annulus properties with stiffnesses varying by up to ±16 per cent. The model also revealed that for a particular compressive deformation or flexural or torsional rotation, the disc bulge was not sensitive to any of the material properties over the range of properties considered. The annulus stresses did differ significantly as the material properties were varied (up to 70 per cent under a compressive load and 60 per cent during disc flexion).

[1]  A B Schultz,et al.  Finite element stress analysis of an intervertebral disc. , 1974, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  R. Sanjeevi,et al.  A viscoelastic model for collagen fibres. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  A. M. Ahmed,et al.  Some static mechanical properties of the lumbar intervertebral joint, intact and injured. , 1982, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  K. Markolf Deformation of the thoracolumbar intervertebral joints in response to external loads: a biomechanical study using autopsy material. , 1972, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  F. Marchand,et al.  Investigation of the Laminate Structure of Lumbar Disc Anulus Fibrosus , 1990, Spine.

[6]  N. Langrana,et al.  Role of Ligaments and Facets in Lumbar Spinal Stability , 1995, Spine.

[7]  B R Simon,et al.  1985 Volvo Award in Biomechanics: Poroelastic Dynamic Structural Models of Rhesus Spinal Motion Segments , 1985, Spine.

[8]  A. Schultz,et al.  Bulging of lumbar intervertebral disks. , 1982, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  H. Farfan,et al.  The effects of torsion on the lumbar intervertebral joints: the role of torsion in the production of disc degeneration. , 1970, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  Y. E. Kim,et al.  An Analytical Investigation of the Mechanics of Spinal Instrumentation , 1988, Spine.

[11]  F Lavaste,et al.  Three-dimensional geometrical and mechanical modelling of the lumbar spine. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  A finite element study of a lumbar motion segment subjected to pure sagittal plane moments. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Hutton Wc,et al.  Do bending, twisting, and diurnal fluid changes in the disc affect the propensity to prolapse? A viscoelastic finite element model , 1996 .

[14]  B R Simon,et al.  Structural models for human spinal motion segments based on a poroelastic view of the intervertebral disk. , 1985, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[15]  V. C. Mow,et al.  Regional Variation in Tensile Properties and Biochemical Composition of the Human Lumbar Anulus Fibrosus , 1994, Spine.

[16]  G A Dumas,et al.  Influence of material properties on the mechanical behaviour of the L5-S1 intervertebral disc in compression: a nonlinear finite element study. , 1991, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[17]  A. Schultz,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Human Lumbar Spine Motion Segments—Part I: Responses in Flexion, Extension, Lateral Bending, and Torsion , 1979 .

[18]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  On the fibre composite material models of disc annulus--comparison of predicted stresses. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  A B Schultz,et al.  Nonlinear behavior of the human intervertebral disc under axial load. , 1976, Journal of Biomechanics.

[20]  A N Natali,et al.  A hyperelastic and almost incompressible material model as an approach to intervertebral disc analysis. , 1991, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[21]  G B Andersson,et al.  The influence of lumbar disc height and cross-sectional area on the mechanical response of the disc to physiologic loading. , 1999, Spine.

[22]  Y K Liu,et al.  A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model of lumbar intervertebral joint in torsion. , 1987, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[23]  J P Laible,et al.  A Poroelastic-Swelling Finite Element Model With Application to the Intervertebral Disc , 1993, Spine.

[24]  A Ratcliffe,et al.  Compressive mechanical properties of the human anulus fibrosus and their relationship to biochemical composition. , 1994, Spine.

[25]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Poroelastic creep response analysis of a lumbar motion segment in compression. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  H. Wu,et al.  Mechanical behavior of the human annulus fibrosus. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  V. Mow,et al.  Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression? Theory and experiments. , 1980, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[28]  M Parnianpour,et al.  Effect of changes in lordosis on mechanics of the lumbar spine-lumbar curvature in lifting. , 1999, Journal of spinal disorders.

[29]  A. M. Ahmed,et al.  Stress analysis of the lumbar disc-body unit in compression. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element study. , 1984, Spine.

[30]  J. Galante Tensile properties of the human lumbar annulus fibrosus. , 1967, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[31]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Effects of preload on load displacement curves of the lumbar spine. , 1977, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[32]  F. G. Evans,et al.  Strength of biological materials , 1970 .

[33]  P. Brinckmann,et al.  Interlaminar Shear Stresses and Laminae Separation in a Disc: Finite Element Analysis of the L3‐L4 Motion Segment Subjected to Axial Compressive Loads , 1995, Spine.

[34]  M. Pearcy,et al.  Lumbar intervertebral disc and ligament deformations measured in vivo. , 1984, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[35]  A B Schultz,et al.  Material constants for a finite element model of the intervertebral disk with a fiber composite annulus. , 1986, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[36]  S. Li,et al.  Development and validation of a viscoelastic finite element model of an L2/L3 motion segment , 1997 .

[37]  J. Shah,et al.  The distribution of surface strain in the cadaveric lumbar spine. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[38]  M J Fagan,et al.  Finite element analysis in spine research , 2002, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[39]  W C Hutton,et al.  The effect of fluid loss on the viscoelastic behavior of the lumbar intervertebral disc in compression. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[40]  C HIRSCH,et al.  New observations on the mechanical behavior of lumbar discs. , 1954, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[41]  W J VIRGIN,et al.  Experimental investigations into the physical properties of the intervertebral disc. , 1951, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[42]  R. W. Little,et al.  A constitutive equation for collagen fibers. , 1972, Journal of biomechanics.

[43]  A. Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Finite–Element Simulation of Changes in the Fluid Content of Human Lumbar Discs: Mechanical and Clinical Implications , 1992, Spine.

[44]  A M Strauss,et al.  Geometric and material property study of the human lumbar spine using the finite element method. , 1992, Journal of spinal disorders.

[45]  K. Markolf,et al.  The structural components of the intervertebral disc. A study of their contributions to the ability of the disc to withstand compressive forces. , 1974, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[46]  N. Yoganandan,et al.  Finite element analysis of the cervical spine: a material property sensitivity study. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[47]  G Ray,et al.  Systems identification for material properties of the intervertebral joint. , 1978, Journal of biomechanics.